Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-10-2006, 10:52 PM   #21
1977 31' Sovereign
 
davidh's Avatar
 
Kalispell , Montana
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 276
Silvertwinkie thats good to hear I am not a chev man but I would take one before a nissan, they do'nt even compare in frame strength they just do'nt campare pereiod..
__________________
1977 31' landyacht Sovereign
davidh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:05 PM   #22
Aluminut
 
Silvertwinkie's Avatar
 
2004 25' Safari
. , Illinois
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidh
Silvertwinkie thats good to hear I am not a chev man but I would take one before a nissan, they do'nt even compare in frame strength they just do'nt campare pereiod..
Don't get me wrong, I am sure Nissan, Toyota, Honda, Land Rover, etc are great cars, SUVs and trucks, but I happen to agree, until they come out with a REAL 3/4 ton....... For nearly a year or so, I've asked the question what does the truck get to get bumped up from the base 6500lbs to the max 9400lbs and the website only says this:

Tow Package (SE and LE Only)
• Class IV receiver hitch
• Additional 7-pin wiring harness plug
• Trailer brake controller pre-wiring under instrument panel
• Heavy-duty battery (710 CCA)
• Lower final gear ratio (3.36:1); similar to 4.10:1 on a 4-speed automatic
• Extendable tow mirrors
• Transmission temperature gauge
• Increased tow capacity

Not a whole lot to support that claim and although the lower final gear ratio is similar to 4.10s, they aren't 4.10s, nor is the rear diff. The rear diff is 1/2 ton. So in reality you have a 1/2 ton truck trying to do put up 3/4 ton specs (as I am sure Bob will tell you from his exp towing a Safari SE FB- his words, not mine). Not saying GM and Ford are the end all save all for towing (they both have their inner demons too), but there is a reason the big three own the 3/4 ton and 1 ton market. I will for sure cringe when Nissan, Toyota and Honda really market a real 3/4 ton. May give the domestics a run for the money....won't be today though....
Silvertwinkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:45 PM   #23
1977 31' Sovereign
 
davidh's Avatar
 
Kalispell , Montana
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 276
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Silvertwinkie!
__________________
1977 31' landyacht Sovereign
davidh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 08:45 AM   #24
Rivet Master
 
2003 25' Safari
Kissimmee , Florida
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 814
Images: 3
A 2004-2006 Ford F150 Supercrew 4X4 with 5.4 V8 has a net carrying capacity of 1,630. My 2003 Safari 25SS has a gross weight of 6,300, at 14% the hitch weight is about 882. This leaves 750 lbs for the truck passengers and stuff. I can't bring my anvil collection.

Yes, an F250/350 would provide more capacity. But, per Andy of Inland RV, stiff rear springs pound the trailer.
__________________
Dan
dmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 09:14 AM   #25
Rivet Master
 
CanoeStream's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,280
Images: 19
Blog Entries: 3
Thumbs up

Ahhh Dan! You're thinkin' right!!

The Titan example was only my personal application of doing the numbers. Not all F-150s are created equal. I don't know Dodge products very well. I know to look at the 1500HD for higher capacities for Chev/GM 1/2-ton trucks. Barkingspider has pointed out the higher capacity Tundra -- full Club Cab I believe...

Doing your math homework still matters .... !
__________________
Bob

5 meter Langford Nahanni

CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 09:38 AM   #26
Aluminut
 
Silvertwinkie's Avatar
 
2004 25' Safari
. , Illinois
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmac
I can't bring my anvil collection.
!!LOL!!

I guess I can't also bring all those 40lb bags of concrete to pour a slab for a campsite too.
Silvertwinkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 10:53 AM   #27
New Member
 
2006 34' Classic Slideout
San Clemente , California
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
All I can say is wow. I didn’t realize that we had a physics professor with us. Bob, I was well within my towing capacity. It looks like I had a very similar truck as Jim (the guy that started the thread). He wanted to know how the F150 towed. It just so happened that I towed several miles with a 2004 F150 (the same as Jim – the guy that started the thread). My truck did better then fine, better then I needed and well within safety standards/concerns. My trailer was loaded with spare tires and all that fun stuff. It doesn’t look like you towed with an F150 but a Nissan so I am not sure how you really fit in. I do appreciate your scientific input and ensure you this will be my last post on this site. I am just your average ordinary guy that owns an Airstream and happens to be a full-timer with my wife for over a year now.

The bottom line is, I am sure Jim’s (the guy that started the thread) F150, with the towing package, will do just fine. GL to you all.
sbrou14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 04:36 PM   #28
Rivet Master
 
Jimandrod's Avatar
 
2008 28' Safari SE
Placitas , New Mexico
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,068
Thanks everyone!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbrou14
... It looks like I had a very similar truck as Jim (the guy that started the thread). He wanted to know how the F150 towed. It just so happened that I towed several miles with a 2004 F150 (the same as Jim – the guy that started the thread). My truck did better then fine, better then I needed and well within safety standards/concerns. My trailer was loaded with spare tires and all that fun stuff. ...The bottom line is, I am sure Jim’s (the guy that started the thread) F150, with the towing package, will do just fine. GL to you all.
I guess sbrou14 says it all. I knew I would hear a lot of different view points, but I wanted to hear the experiences of those who have actually towed a similar trailer with an F-150. And... I do appreciate all of the viewpoints. That's how we all benefit from this forum.

It looks like I'll be fine. There are only two of us camping (total weight less than 375 lbs) no canoes, no jet skis, no dirt bikes and no snowmobiles. Just the basics. I have the right axel ratio, a 5.4L V8 and a decent tow package. As long as I take it easy on the road I should nave no problems.

By all means - if anyone else has any more comments, please add them.

Thanks again

Jim (the guy that started the thread)
Jimandrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 10:36 PM   #29
1 Rivet Member
 
bbutler455's Avatar
 
1971 27' Overlander
plano , Texas
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Thumbs up F150 owner that just bought a 71 27ft Overlander

What did we do before the Internet? I'm new in this forum but have gotten tons of info to help me find the TT I wanted.

I too have a F150 (05 Supercab, 5.5' bed 133" wheelbase, 5.4l 3v, and trailer package). Due to the shorter wheelbase (much easier to park) my max towing is 8200lbs, however my new old airstream is lighter at less than 5000lbs.

I am a complete car nut and ALWAYS upgrade my vehicles. Dorothy (my beatuiful white truck) is no exception. I have already realized a significant improvement in power and MPG by installing a K&N cold air intake, power chip programer, and less restrictive cat-back single exhaust. The truck rumbles a little bit more than stock but the improvement in torque and power is very noticable, as is the 2-3 mpg improvement. I am now replacing the K&N intake with a factory approved Roush Supercharger ($3,995 on e-bay). This is a roots type blower identical to the unit Ford puts on their Lightning super-truck. This adds 120hp and 100flb of torque at very low RPMs which would improve the towing performance.

Here is the question - If I am safely within the weight limit, won't this combination be a good tow package on the hills as well as the fast flat stretches? Do I still have to turn off my OD if the engine is pulling the load easily? Should I get a trans temp gauge just in case?

I am a car nut but a trailer idiot - please let me know if I am missing something obvious. And you other F150 lovers, I encourage you to help your truck breath easier and run cooler with a less restrictive intake and exhaust. It transforms the 5.4l motor into a mellow monster.
bbutler455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 11:25 PM   #30
Rivet Master
 
wheel interested's Avatar
 
2007 23' International CCD
Lapeer , Michigan
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,082
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimandrod
I guess sbrou14 says it all. I knew I would hear a lot of different view points, but I wanted to hear the experiences of those who have actually towed a similar trailer with an F-150. And... I do appreciate all of the viewpoints. That's how we all benefit from this forum.

It looks like I'll be fine. There are only two of us camping (total weight less than 375 lbs) no canoes, no jet skis, no dirt bikes and no snowmobiles. Just the basics. I have the right axel ratio, a 5.4L V8 and a decent tow package. As long as I take it easy on the road I should nave no problems.

By all means - if anyone else has any more comments, please add them.

Thanks again

Jim (the guy that started the thread)
We pull a 25' Classic with an 2000 Expedition which has the same platform as the F-150 with a Reese Dual Cam our gearing is low and it's rated to 6800# We weighed the trailer and we are under that loaded with 1/4 water tank, no spare and full propane and gear. We exceeded the GCVWR by 1000 # (13500#) packed for a month long trip, and the hitch weight is over. We have gone from Michigan to North to Maine, South to Florida twice and West to Arizona and up and down some hills and grades but not the Rockies with this combination. We feel the pull of passing trucks on the interstate. We average 11-13 miles per gallon towing. Before the Classic we pulled a 25' Safari. The Classic feels more stable. We are currently looking for a different TV and/or a lighter trailer to get within spec.
__________________
Caroljb



photography
wheel interested is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 05:04 AM   #31
Rivet Monster
 
wahoonc's Avatar

 
1975 31' Sovereign
1980 31' Excella II
Sprung Leak , North Carolina
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,172
Images: 40
bbutler,
Welcome to the forums
IMHO a tranny temp gauge is a must! Especially when towing. Heat will kill a transmission faster than anything I know. FWIW I just retired a 97 F150 V-6 from towing duty and it has over 300k miles on it. What I found by watching the tach was when the torque converter unlocked you would get a 5-700 rpm jump, then lock back down, when it started doing that on flat ground or mild inclines it was time to turn the OD off. And if you have the tranny temp gauge you would see the temps start to rise after a couple of these cycles, if you didn't.

Aaron
__________________
....so many Airstreams....so little time...
WBCCI #XXXX AIR #2495
Why are we in this basket...and where are we going
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 07:15 AM   #32
1 Rivet Member
 
bbutler455's Avatar
 
1971 27' Overlander
plano , Texas
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Cool Still confused

Wahoonc,
What causes the converter to lock and unlock? If the truck is in OD and the engine is pulling strongly, i.e. the rpm's are not dropping, is there any reason to turn off the OD? In other words, do you turn off the OD because the engine is not strong enough to pull the OD ratio and is causing the tranny to shift in and out of overdrive? Or, does running in OD put stress on you transmission, regardless of your available engine torque?
__________________
Brock
bbutler455@hotmail.com
1971 27 ft Overlander (Lola)
2005 F150 Supercab w/ 5.4L, Tow Pkg, B&M Tran Temp, K&N Intake, JBA Exhaust, Hyperdyne Chip, Equalizer Hitch (Dorothy)
bbutler455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 07:47 AM   #33
Rivet Monster
 
wahoonc's Avatar

 
1975 31' Sovereign
1980 31' Excella II
Sprung Leak , North Carolina
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,172
Images: 40
Brock,
It is my understanding that the engine is not strong enough to pull the ratios that the OD has so it will unlock the converter to bring the engine back to the power band. With the mods you are making it may not be as obvious, and you can reprogram the tranny too. But the OD's were designed for unloaded highway mileage. My 96 F350 PSD has the EO4D tranny in it, but the manual says to tow in OD. I know the owner's manual on my 97 F150 said to turn it off when towing. I have to assume they have the transmission on the F350 programmed for the towing. I don't have the tranny temp gauge on it...yet. It definitely puts a stress on the transmission, think about turning a 1/4" bolt using a 3/4" drive breaker bar...The transmission is typically the weakest link with a few notable exceptions...ie Allison that GM is using.

Aaron
__________________
....so many Airstreams....so little time...
WBCCI #XXXX AIR #2495
Why are we in this basket...and where are we going
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 07:55 AM   #34
Rivet Master
 
2003 25' Safari
Kissimmee , Florida
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 814
Images: 3
If the computer wants to downshift because of the load, then upshift - back and forth... the tranny will overheat and self-destruct. The temp gauge mentioned earlier is a good idea. You will need to experiment to see what driving conditions, if any, will allow you to tow in OD.

Your engine enhancements are great for power, but otherwise more torque going through the system could wear out the tranny and rear end prematurely.

As you have read, transmissions seem to be the weak link (durability wise) when towing. Change the tranny fluid often (~30,000 miles?), monitor the transmission temperature, and prevent it from hunting between gears.
__________________
Dan
dmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 08:02 AM   #35
Rivet Master
 
wheel interested's Avatar
 
2007 23' International CCD
Lapeer , Michigan
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,082
Blog Entries: 2
We never tow in OD. Quick question here everyone, if I had to make a choice between a longer 130" wheel base with a smaller engine and lower gears (i.e. the 2007 Avalanche -no 2500s for 2007) and a 120" wheel base with a larger engine and gearing (i.e the Denali-not the XL) which would be better for towing?
__________________
Caroljb



photography
wheel interested is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 08:20 AM   #36
Rivet Master
 
2003 25' Safari
Kissimmee , Florida
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 814
Images: 3
Depends on the length and weight of your trailer, and where you will be going... but I would lean towards the longer wheelbase. Most of the time you are cruising on relatively level highways and the wheelbase will help to track straight and more resistant to wind and passing semis.

If you are buying new, why not get a long wheelbase with a big engine and numerically high axle ratio and have it all? Classic trailers are heavy!
__________________
Dan
dmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 09:02 AM   #37
Rivet Master
 
wheel interested's Avatar
 
2007 23' International CCD
Lapeer , Michigan
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,082
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmac
Depends on the length and weight of your trailer, and where you will be going... but I would lean towards the longer wheelbase. Most of the time you are cruising on relatively level highways and the wheelbase will help to track straight and more resistant to wind and passing semis.

If you are buying new, why not get a long wheelbase with a big engine and numerically high axle ratio and have it all? Classic trailers are heavy!
I like the look of the Avalanche and can carry the bikes and generator in the short bed, my hubby wants 2007 with the GMT900 and other new features but Chevy has said no 2500s. It's very difficult for me to warm up to the look of 20 more inches of glass on the XL or burb. I thought we were good to go with the AV until I read they cut the 2500s for 2007. Hubby didn't want a pickup initially at all and this was a good compromise. Ergo my feelings to go with a lighter trailer as a possibility.
__________________
Caroljb



photography
wheel interested is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 10:14 AM   #38
Rivet Master

 
, Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,721
Images: 59
Carol,

I can understand your dilema, choosing between a Avalanche or 'Burb, or was it a Denali (not XL), and the various wheelbases.

I think a factor which is just as important than wheelbase is the type of tires on your tow vehicle. A short wheelbase with stiff LT tires will handle just as well as a longer wheelbase with Passenger rated tires.

That is also a key difference between a 2000 Expedition and a 2000 F-150; same platform, but with different tires will have very different handling characteristics.

Obviously, the best combination is a long wheelbase with LT tires, and the worst is a short wheelbase with P-tires. But there is a lot of room in between.
markdoane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:53 PM   #39
Rivet Master
 
Denis4x4's Avatar
 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
Currently Looking...
Durango , Colorado
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,112
I've been towing open car trailers from Durango to Scottsdale or Colorado Springs a couple of times a year for nine years. One TV is a '99 F-250 Crew Cab 4x4 with a V-10 and an '03 Navigator with the 5.4 300 HP. I've never found a problem towing in OD on flat ground.

Prior to ordering a 25' Safari LS SS FB (due the end of March) we towed a 34' gooseneck Featherlite car hauler with living quarters. Quite frankly, the Featherlite quality is equal to an AS in my opinion. But, it's difficult to compare an FL car or horse trailer with living quarters to an AS as they are designed for different tasks.
Denis4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 05:57 PM   #40
3 Rivet Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 186
Images: 4
F-150 Tow Vehicle

I have responded to the tow vehicle size polls and written a couple of messages about towing with a F-150. I have a 5.4L, 3.55 with a tow package and a 31ft Excella (8160lb max). I have a weight distributing with sway bar (Reece) hitch.
I towed my AS from Ann Arbor, MI to the mouth of the Columbia River and back home; 7000 miles during the summer of 2002. I lost track of the number of times I crossed the Continental Divide. I entered Lake Tahoe from Carson City and exited it from the north end of the lake (Truckee). I drove highway 49 from Placerville to Sutter's Creek and into Sacramento. I don't want to bore you with the rest of the trip but suffice it to say I was pleased with the way the F-150 handled the AS. I did not use OD and kept my speeds to under 65mph. My mileage was around 11 to 12 mpg and I had no service problems. There may come a time that I replace the 1998 F-150 and if I do I may plan for a F-250 diesel considering the price of gasoline and the fact that I may full time with my wife. Our children are growing up and I am about to retire. The highway looks aluminum to me.
Cheers..............
rtaylor537 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Towing Experience app Tow Vehicles 9 04-19-2004 09:51 PM
Towing Regulations by State InsideOut Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches 2 09-16-2002 07:35 AM
Towing COArgosy78 1965 - 1969 Overlander 5 09-05-2002 10:18 AM
Towing cars CBBOB Airstream Motorhome Forums 13 07-24-2002 08:15 PM
Towing my 1964 Safari - what tow vehicle do I use Neenm Tow Vehicles 6 06-28-2002 04:26 PM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.