Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Running Gear - Axles, Brakes, Wheels & Tires > Brakes & Brake Controllers
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-01-2006, 03:10 PM   #1
Rivet Master
 
JimGolden's Avatar
 
Vintage Kin Owner
1977 31' Excella 500
Berkeley Springs , West Virginia
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,638
Images: 7
Genset on extended tongue safe?

Not really sure where to fit this question; it's kind of frame related so I'll stick it in the frame and axle section. If it belongs elsewhere, I'm sure one of the moderators will help out by moving it

OK, so I'm going to build a brand new, from scratch, improved design frame for my Airstream. The question is: Is it safe to put a generator up front on the tongue, near the LP bottles? I could put a barrier up there to keep leaking LP from getting around the exhaust pipe of the generator. As long as its well ventilated, is there any danger in putting a permanently mounted genset up front?

Would it be better in the back? If so, why?

My plan is to set this thing up balance wise and strength wise so I can haul my 350lb Kawasaki on the a specially made mount on the back bumper. I know this would destruct a normal Airstream frame, but the one I'm designing will do this easily. I know it can lighten the tongue load a lot, but the genset up front should help to balance it out. As well, I could mount a spare up there. The arm is longer from the axles' centerline to the tongue than to the back bumper, so it's an easy calc to figure out how much it takes to balance it all out.

So the biggest fly in the ointment I see is: is it safe to have a genset up by the LP bottles? What do you all think?

Thanks!
__________________
- Jim
JimGolden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 03:28 PM   #2
Rivet Master
 
Fyrzowt's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
West of Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,699
Images: 8
Safety question

You would most likely have no problem.....BUT if you have a leak that reaches an ignition source (most likely at the generator exhaust or internal electrical arc at the brushes) you will have a fire. Being in an open area and not confined it will probably not go boom. Still, you don't need a fire.

Can you reverse your plan? Put the generator on the rear and the bike on the front? That would seperate your fuel from an ignition source at the generator.

My 2 cents.

Dave
Fyrzowt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 03:34 PM   #3
Rivet Master
 
TomW's Avatar
 
1967 26' Overlander
Huntsville , Alabama
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,018
Images: 4
Remember I'm just an E.I.T

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGolden
...Is it safe to put a generator up front on the tongue, near the LP bottles? I could put a barrier up there to keep leaking LP from getting around the exhaust pipe of the generator. As long as its well ventilated, is there any danger in putting a permanently mounted genset up front?

Would it be better in the back? If so, why?
Jim,

IMO, first stage design goal would be to keep the generator's general heat & not necessarily source of ignition away from the propane cylinders. Liquid fuel at ambient pressure (gasoline) is one thing, but if an LPG cylinder overpressurizes, the relief valve might say "hello" with gusto.

If you make provisions for the heat, and it could be in the form of a removable shield installed only for generator use, with proper design you can cover the possibility of leaking LPG.

IMO, anything mounted on the bumper would look bad aesthetically.

List of assumptions include your extended tongue design taking into account backing up at tight turning radii?

Tom
TomW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 03:39 PM   #4
Rivet Master
 
Road Ruler's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
St. Catharines , South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,367
Images: 38
No doubt your new frame will handle the weight overall but where the weight is located may introduce handling issues.

Trailer builders soon realized that getting as much of the overall weight on or close to the axles produced a trailer that had very good handling characteristics. On the other hand when they loaded up the front or rear ( or both ) with excessive weight handling went out the window. Something to keep in mind with your project.
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
Road Ruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 04:40 PM   #5
4 Rivet Member
 
bobchevy89's Avatar
 
1977 24' Argosy 24
Inverness , Florida
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 264
hello Jim ,there was a thread here about gensets on the rear . Don't do it.. if you get rear ended there can be a fire hazzard for you and the vechicle that hit you..some one can and will get hurt..
Bob
bobchevy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 05:48 PM   #6
Rivet Master
 
CanoeStream's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,280
Images: 19
Blog Entries: 3
This is a no brainer for an LP conversion to the generator. That would have fewer flammability issues compared to gasoline. I'd probably look at a Yamaha large enough to power the A/C while you're at it. The outer case on these is plastic -- they're insulated enough to be cool to the touch except at the exhaust. You'd probably want to have a decision and one of these in hand before firming up your design. Remember to coordinate A-frame design with your WD gear too.
__________________
Bob

5 meter Langford Nahanni

CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:44 PM   #7
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGolden
My plan is to set this thing up balance wise and strength wise so I can haul my 350lb Kawasaki on the a specially made mount on the back bumper. I know this would destruct a normal Airstream frame, but the one I'm designing will do this easily. I know it can lighten the tongue load a lot, but the genset up front should help to balance it out. As well, I could mount a spare up there. The arm is longer from the axles' centerline to the tongue than to the back bumper, so it's an easy calc to figure out how much it takes to balance it all out.

So the biggest fly in the ointment I see is: is it safe to have a genset up by the LP bottles? What do you all think?

Thanks!
Every installation that I have seen in our shop where a generator has been installed on the A-frame, has led to absolute failure.

The more weight on the A-frame, the more it will flex and the more it will fatigue crack, when towing.

Add to that the possibility of unbalanced running gear and/or over hitching and your guaranteed a failure.

You can however, replace the entire A-frame with heavier duty steel and maybe, just maybe, not have a problem.

The last one in our shop, came in with "NO" A-frame, as it completely broke off.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 03:36 PM   #8
Rivet Master
 
TomW's Avatar
 
1967 26' Overlander
Huntsville , Alabama
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,018
Images: 4
Exclamation We interrupt for this special diversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inland RV Center, In
...The more weight on the A-frame, the more it will flex and the more it will fatigue crack, when towing.

Add to that the possibility of unbalanced running gear and/or over hitching and your guaranteed a failure....
Jim,

You have probably got Andy's first point covered, but I would like to sidetrack (not hijack ) your thread to share something I found while setting up my drawbar to accomodate the height gained due to my Overlander's new axles: My A-frame appears to be bent upward.

While my Airstream's previous owner did not carry an additional load on the tongue, he did use 1000 pound spring bars in conjunction with a 3/4 ton tow vehicle for a period of seven years of active camping. After reading Andy's previous posts on the topic, I have concluded that my Airstream was over-hitched during that time. I believe the too-stout spring bars bent the A-frame.

While I was blissfully ignorant, during the refurbishment, of Andy's insight, much time was taken to examine the frame members, and I observed no cracks. So I think I am okay.

But since I observed remarkably better towing characteristics after moving to 550 pound spring bars, I wanted to reinforce Andy's statement.

We now return to the thread's regular programming...

Tom
TomW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 03:57 PM   #9
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomW
While my Airstream's previous owner did not carry an additional load on the tongue, he did use 1000 pound spring bars in conjunction with a 3/4 ton tow vehicle for a period of seven years of active camping. After reading Andy's previous posts on the topic, I have concluded that my Airstream was over-hitched during that time. I believe the too-stout spring bars bent the A-frame.

Tom
Over hitching, in time, will permanently bend the A-frame upward.

Is it stressing itself and the welds?

You betcha.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 11:04 AM   #10
Rivet Master
 
JimGolden's Avatar
 
Vintage Kin Owner
1977 31' Excella 500
Berkeley Springs , West Virginia
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,638
Images: 7
Thank you all for your replies. You guys certainly bring up some good points.

As to hauling the bike on the back, yes I am concerned about the handling of it. I don't know any other way to check for that other than to build it and try it. I've hauled heavy concentrated loads at the end of my utility trailer and it did OK, but it doesn't have as much overhang as the Airstream does. If it does indeed handle poorly due to having too much weight at the extreme ends, then I"ll just not do it anymore, and go to hauling a 30lb bicycle instead of a 350lb motorcycle. My belly would probably thank me for that I know my new frame will take the weight, but the handling is an unknown. All else being equal, it'd be nice to concentrate all the weight over the wheels.

I'd read about the over hitching on other threads previously. It took me awhile to understand it. If I get this right, basically, the heavier your tow vehicle, then the less you need to "spring" the hitch height up with bars. Further, for the bars to be effective, you need to bend them a certain amount. I used to know what that amount was, but I don't recall. I think like 1/2" maybe? You have to do this to get the benefits of the bars for sway control, etc., other than just raising the thing back up (which you could do with diamond bars that don't flex at all, but then they wouldn't do much for you to control sway, etc.) So if I understand this right, then for the bars to provide handling benefits in addition to weight distribution, if the truck is sprung heavily, then you need to use lighter bars, because you're not really trying to raise the height a whole lot. So the light bars allow you to get the proper amount of flex in them to give you the handling benefits, while also raising it the minimum anount you need. With a smaller tow vehicle, you then have to use heavier bars so that you don't bend them too much while raising the hitch back up to where it should be.

Am I getting this right? It's kind of complicated...to me anyway

I've got a Reese Dual Cam that came with the trailer. I've no idea what rating the bars are. They're so old that all the stickers and writing are long worn away.

When I towed the trailer home, I just set it on the ball and went. I've got a 3/4 ton HD Dodge with the 4-doors and long bed (it's long as a freight car...) and it pulled it home just fine. When I actually start traveling, I don't plan to pull it this way. I'll set up a proper hitch rig. It did seem to me that I'd researched all this way back and I was going to try and get a set of the 550lb bars. I think Andy may have gone all over this in some previous threads that I read last year. I know its been covered well on here.

Didn't Airstream put generator on some of their travel trailers? If so, where did the factory put them?

Thanks!
__________________
- Jim
JimGolden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 11:36 AM   #11
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGolden
As to hauling the bike on the back, yes I am concerned about the handling of it. I don't know any other way to check for that other than to build it and try it.!
Jim.

The bike does not weight 30 pounds when you carry it on the rear bumper.

You must consider the "moment arm." That is how far from the rear axle will that bike be?

It's about 12 feet. Therefore you must multiply the weight by the 12 feet. Now your bike weighs 360 punds, sitting still. Then when traveling you hit some bumps, that weight instantly multiplies up to several times that moment arm weight. Another way to say it, is that weight can multiply to over 1000 pounds, very easily, when hitting bumps.

Questions then come up regarding will that sudden weight change have any effect on the stability of the towing? Also, will it have any effect on possible rear end separation?

The rating of Reese bars are simple to measure. Measure the top of the bar as it enters the trunnion. That measurement will be 1" (550#), 1 1/8" (750#) or 1 1/4" (1000#). Those ratings only apply when the bars are coupled with the dual cam sway control.

The basic hitching rule also depends on the tow vehicle. For standard cars of long ago, without assists, for your trailer, you would use 1000 pound bars. With a 1/2 ton truck, without overload springs or other assists, you would use a 750 # bar.

A tow vehicle that is greater than a 1/2 ton truck, would then use a 550 pound bar. A Suburban with an overload spring, as an example would require a 550 pound rating. This is the category that your TV is in.

A ideal bend in Reese bars using the "cam" type sway control is 1 inch, or more. During my traveling days that bend was 2 inches. Could tow all day with two fingers. How nice that was.

Airstream in some 1973 models, installed a very small 12 volt generator, solely to charge the battery. It was very light weight, about 60 pounds as I remember, and ran on Propane.

However, the carb had to be adjusted when you changed altitude by as little as 2000 feet. It shortly became a pain in the neck. However, when it did work, it did a great job. You started it from the front rooflocker, and it also had a timer, so that it would shut itself off after a period of time.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2006, 12:48 PM   #12
Rivet Master
 
2003 25' Safari
Kissimmee , Florida
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 814
Images: 3
Jim, Can you just put the motorcycle and a portable generator in the pickup bed? Sounds a lot easier and safer to me!
__________________
Dan
dmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 07:42 AM   #13
Rivet Master
 
JimGolden's Avatar
 
Vintage Kin Owner
1977 31' Excella 500
Berkeley Springs , West Virginia
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,638
Images: 7
Dan,

It's starting to sound like that may be the way to go. Although, if I do that, then I'd have to remove my cap and lose all that storage space. I was really hoping to carry the "little' Kawi out back.

Andy,

Your explanation on the bars was great. Thanks. I will go and measure mine. I understand about the moment arm idea. The frame I've designed would handle the weight no problem at all, as far as flexing and bouncing go. But the handling is another issue altogether. I have to think on this some, but much as I hate to admit it, you guys might be right on this one.

I did see a huge fifth wheel going up the road recently with a Harley on the back bumper. The big twin easily weighs double what my little enduro weighs, but the 5'er probably weighs 2.5 times what my "little" Airstream weighs. And, nothing says that 5'er handled well either.

As to the generator, I'll figure something out. I want to build a camper that's its own self contained little world. I'm planning a gutting and total rebuild, so I could maybe locate a generator amidships somewhere. It's just that noise then becomes a factor. And, I'd have to be very wary of fumes. At least, moreso than if it was out front.

I'm going to make the tongue from the same steel I do the main frame, so it will be much beefier than OEM. So, I'm not worried that the generator would bend it up there.

But, I do have a question: Why don't the 1000 lb dual cam bars bend the tongue when used behind a passenger car, if they do when used behind a truck? I would think that if you bend the bars 2", no matter what you're hitched to, you'd be putting a tremendous force into the tongue?
__________________
- Jim
JimGolden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 09:55 AM   #14
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimGolden

But, I do have a question: Why don't the 1000 lb dual cam bars bend the tongue when used behind a passenger car, if they do when used behind a truck? I would think that if you bend the bars 2", no matter what you're hitched to, you'd be putting a tremendous force into the tongue?
The suspension system on trucks is much heavier than cars.

It's hitting bumps that causes the problem.

Therefore when hitting bumps, more energy is transfered to the A-frame from a truck than a car, through the load eqaulizing hitch.

When you stiffen the bars, you reduce the flexing from a given bump. Add to that the rigidity of typical truck suspension systems, and you now have created a cause for the bent A-frame problem.

Reducing the rating of the bars when using a heavy duty tow vehicle, also reduces the stresses placed on an A-frame, again with a given bump.

I also bent the A-frame on a 73 31 foot Airstream. I used a 1973 Buick Electra as a tow vehicle. The bars were Reese 1000 pounds with the dual cam. I had approximately 1200 pounds of tongue weight, plus a huge trunk load. I also had the car equipped with an additional fuel tank so that I could carry 65 gallons of fuel. Add to that tools etc, and there went the weight.

I also had air shocks and air bags. Each system had it's own pressure gauge, plus I could add or subtract air pressure as I was moving. So cars can cause the same problem, depending on the setup.

That set up was used to do many experiments while traveling, so that we could set forth some guidelines as to what is ok and what is not ok. I was the sole field special representative for the old insurance division of Airstream, called Caravanner Insurance Company. We established many do's and don'ts, along with documentation, so that any given situation could be duplicated.

That data also allowed us to predict "loss of control accidents waiting to happen," and they did, BIG TIME.

We wanted to have all the rigging information added to the insurance policy questions, so that we could insure someone or not, based on that research data. But the Airstream powers that be at that time, nixed the idea, but accepted the facts. Prior to that study, Airstream said over and over again, that it was impossible to figure out how or why a loss of control accidents happened. WRONG.

After I completed that research, Airstream then accepted the facts and causes of loss of control accidents.

That was back in 1970 and 1971. The causes of loss of control accidents, specifically towing an Airstream or Argosy trailer, remain exactly the same today.

The guidelines and causes of loss of control accidents is easily published.

The difficult part, is to get people to accept those facts.

Sometimes, as in your case, you found out the difference. It's people like you, that can steer the cultivation in the right direction, far better than I.

I am all to many times looked at as a dealer, with a sole purpose of making money.

That is not true.

I also, to a very large degree, promote "SAFETY", which only has a price tag to the owner of the rig, and his family, not to me or Inland RV Center, Inc.

Many years ago, there was a device called Safe T Tow. We are working on bring that to the market place, within a year if possible.

It's a device that mounts in the rear end of your tow vehicle. It automatically applies the trailer brakes, faster than you can, in the event of a possible loss of control situation. It also warns you of instability, such as a possible high cross winds or even a low tire. With it, it becomes almost impossible to have a loss of control accident.

I demonstrated that device, many years ago, at a number of different Airstream rallies. It's acceptance was outstanding.

It carried some 19 patents. We have modified it, and have applied for additional patent protections.

Stay tuned.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:08 AM   #15
Rivet Master
 
1975 29' Ambassador
Reno , Nevada
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,351
Quote:
No doubt your new frame will handle the weight overall but where the weight is located may introduce handling issues.
Andy has it right about the moment arm, which is the cause of this.

With a genset in front and a bike in back you are talking about significant weights a good distance from your trailer's pivot point. 600# would be getting near 10% of the total trailer weight. That means your going to have quite a bit of energy tied up in the angular motion (sway inducing) of the trailer.

You can compensate somewhat for what this will do but I know from experience, especially with the participants here, that efforts to discuss that rationally is likely to create an overwhelming urge for censorship. Been there, done that, dissappointed in the moderation I have seen all too often. Important topics that cannot be discussed.
bryanl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:26 AM   #16
Rivet Master
 
Fyrzowt's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
West of Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,699
Images: 8
Quote:
With a genset in front and a bike in back you are talking about significant weights a good distance from your trailer's pivot point. 600# would be getting near 10% of the total trailer weight. That means your going to have quite a bit of energy tied up in the angular motion (sway inducing) of the trailer.
This is a dynamic that I hadn't originally considered, I was thinking from a fire safety standpoint.
I'm picturing some of the roads that we have out here in CA. Even without added weight front and back, often times with certain vehicle combinations or lengths you can get a lot of induced porpoising from the expansion joints in the concrete roadway. If you throw the added weight on each end into that dynamic as a force multiplier you could be in for some serious problems in terms of handling and structural integrity.
Dave
Fyrzowt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:36 AM   #17
1 Rivet Member
 
paxflyer's Avatar
 
2003 25' Safari
Maple Valley , Washington
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Images: 14
What about this setup?

Click image for larger version

Name:	PICT2795.JPG
Views:	117
Size:	205.8 KB
ID:	28285 Click image for larger version

Name:	PICT2797.JPG
Views:	113
Size:	178.4 KB
ID:	28286 [ATTACH]28287/ATTACH]

I can place the single Honda 2000 behind the LP tanks. The battery top is very thick and seems strudy. Weight is 47lb. plus fuel. I'll convert to LP for safety reasons. Put brakets up for security and easy removal. I ran the 11,000 BTU A/C on my 25SS and gen with eco switch off pulled her fine. With the gen cover on the gen actually blends in with the 22SS.

Also, What about moving the electric plug to the front and running the 25SS A/C on while underway for the dog? The ride actually apears nicer than the Ford Supercrew. The dog is always asleep when I open the door and is up on the forward couch.
The side clearences are not great, maybe 2 inches on sides, plenty on the front and back. I placed the exhaust to street side and kept the windows closed. I would never sleep in this configuation due to gasses. I will install a corbon monoxide detector as well. I also ran the unit for 30 minutes and the sides of the gen or 25SS did not get warm at all. Another good note very little vibration inside the coach while on, less than a newer SOB class C with it's gen on.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	PICT2796.JPG
Views:	116
Size:	201.0 KB
ID:	28287  
paxflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:47 AM   #18
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxflyer

The ride actually apears nicer than the Ford Supercrew. The dog is always asleep when I open the door and is up on the forward couch.
You asked?

It appears you have enough hitch to tow the Queen Mary.

The torsion bars for your rig, should not be rated at more than 500 to 550 pounds.

Anything in excess of that will cause front end damage.

You must allow adequate flexing. You have already severely reduced that with your choice of a tow vehicle.

Another step would be to remove the overload springs on the truck.

Then, you would have a chance of not damaging the front end of the trailer, as well as not shaking the generator apart.

Additionally, you should have a sway control. Your photo's don't show any.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 08:19 PM   #19
1 Rivet Member
 
paxflyer's Avatar
 
2003 25' Safari
Maple Valley , Washington
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Images: 14
Thanks for the tips. I thought the equalizer provided 4-way sway control. The ship is very steady in crosswinds and when big trucks go blasting by. Thanks again, James
paxflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 09:19 AM   #20
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,497
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxflyer
Thanks for the tips. I thought the equalizer provided 4-way sway control. The ship is very steady in crosswinds and when big trucks go blasting by. Thanks again, James
Try riding, but be careful when you do, in the back of your Airstream at 60 to 70 miles per hour, for about 30 minutes.

Then please, report back as to it's stability, or lack thereof.

Andy
__________________
Andy Rogozinski
Inland RV Center
Corona, CA
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Security lock for the tongue? Diana Langley Hitches, Couplers & Balls 11 11-19-2002 11:01 AM
Tongue Tied CHRIS CANNON Jacks, Stabilizers, Lifting and Leveling 0 09-30-2002 08:44 PM
Tongue uwe Repairing/Replacing Floor &/or Frame 10 08-27-2002 01:43 PM
Electr. Tongue Jack Wiring?? roessler Jacks, Stabilizers, Lifting and Leveling 12 07-17-2002 11:00 AM
New tongue layout FrankR Cleaning, Stripping & Polishing 0 03-07-2002 08:51 PM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.