Airstream Forums

Airstream Forums (https://www.airforums.com/forums/)
-   2018 - Current Globetrotter (https://www.airforums.com/forums/f543/)
-   -   23FB dinette ouch (https://www.airforums.com/forums/f543/23fb-dinette-ouch-208837.html)

mtbmitch 05-25-2020 08:24 PM

23FB dinette ouch
 
We window shopped at our nice Boise area Airstream dealer on Saturday. My wife and I are eventually going to get either a Serenity or Globetrotter 23fb. We sat in the dinette of the GT for about 10 minutes. Is it just us or are the back cushions a bit uncomfortable? The Serenity back cushions appear to look different. Any one sat in both and have an opinion?
thanks
Mitch

uraljohn 05-25-2020 09:21 PM

23fb
 
The dinette in the 23FB has been a bone of complaint by many. While the 23FB has a great bath and a queen bed with nice wardrobe/storage, the dinette, the only place to sit, is a source of disappointment. Some folks modify the table. Some folks remove dinette and replace with a couch type arrangement.

Just a suggestion, but look at a 25 Front Bed Twin or Rear Bed Twin. Couple feet longer but 6" wider. Huge difference with the 6" wider. We started with a 2017 23D. 2 years later we went to a 2019 FC 25 RBT. Huge difference and actually pulls better than the 23D.

The 25 RBT has a nicer/bigger bathroom than the 25 FB if that is important to you. It was to us. The only other floorplan we would consider is the FC 30 RBT as it has the nice big bathroom. Do your homework. Go to the dealer and spend hours in each floorplan. Yes, hours. Imagine a long rainy day and being inside for hours. Then you will know what will work for you. Lot of $$$$. Get it right the first time.

eyechip 05-26-2020 05:39 AM

I'm in the same boat so to say. After two years in an Airstream interstate though, the dinette and overall space seems like a HUGE upgrade from the cramped space of the AI and the horribly tight seating area/bed. But I wonder, in two years will the 23ft GT seem too tight in comparison to the 25ft? Seems like a lot of people ended up converting to the 25ft after a few years.

I LOVE the rear bath though. After having the side placed minuscule bathroom in the Interstate it's like upgrading to an oceanfront suite.

mtbmitch 05-26-2020 08:02 AM

Right after we got back from the looking at the AS's, we sat in the dinette of our Lance 1575. It is comfortable in comparison. What is the actual tongue weight of your 25 RBT?
thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by uraljohn (Post 2363721)
The dinette in the 23FB has been a bone of complaint by many. While the 23FB has a great bath and a queen bed with nice wardrobe/storage, the dinette, the only place to sit, is a source of disappointment. Some folks modify the table. Some folks remove dinette and replace with a couch type arrangement.

Just a suggestion, but look at a 25 Front Bed Twin or Rear Bed Twin. Couple feet longer but 6" wider. Huge difference with the 6" wider. We started with a 2017 23D. 2 years later we went to a 2019 FC 25 RBT. Huge difference and actually pulls better than the 23D.

The 25 RBT has a nicer/bigger bathroom than the 25 FB if that is important to you. It was to us. The only other floorplan we would consider is the FC 30 RBT as it has the nice big bathroom. Do your homework. Go to the dealer and spend hours in each floorplan. Yes, hours. Imagine a long rainy day and being inside for hours. Then you will know what will work for you. Lot of $$$$. Get it right the first time.


Hans627 05-26-2020 09:24 AM

Originally I really wanted the 23' for towing and parking etc. But after spending time sitting in one we decided against it. Just too uncomfortable for us after several hours. We ultimately decided upon a 27' GT. What makes the GT nice in these lengths (25', 27' and 30') is the wrap around backrest that can act like a lounge and make the seating area so much more comfortable, especially when watching a movie or TV.

And another option is the seating area in the FC 26'. It is much more comfortable as compared to the 23' dinette.

So nice to have choices!

Steamy1 05-26-2020 10:08 AM

Everything having to do with an RV is a compromise. We enjoy the RV queen bed and the large bath of the 23FB, as well as the shorter length and narrow profile for towing and maneuvering.

The fresh water tank of 39 gallons is comparable to larger units.

We have found that we just don't spend that much time sitting around the table.

With that said, we have made a couple of changes to make it more comfortable; switched out the backrest cushions with thinner ones from the Bambi, which in turn provides more seat cushion space and installed a smaller table top to give more room.

If we are confined in the trailer due to weather, we lounge around on the bed or just convert the dinette into a day lounge.

It works for us. The 23FB is a good "compromise" of size vs. ease of towing and overall features.

uraljohn 05-26-2020 01:39 PM

2019 FC 25 RBT tongue weight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mtbmitch (Post 2363807)
Right after we got back from the looking at the AS's, we sat in the dinette of our Lance 1575. It is comfortable in comparison. What is the actual tongue weight of your 25 RBT?
thanks

According to my last 3 pass weigh in at a CAT scale the AS weighs right at 6400 LBS all loaded up and ready for travel. Tongue weight worked out to 960 LBS. Tow vehicle is a 2013 Ford E150 XLT Premium van with Factory Tow Package and the heavy duty 8600 LB GVW rating. The van weighs just over 6400 LBS also all loaded and ready for travel. Combined Gross Weight of rig was 12,862 LBS.

This E150 van is a rare find. Most E150 vans do not have the 8600 LB GVWR. It took me 6 months to find one of these vans. It is also highly optioned with just about everything you could get from the factory when it was built.

Hope the Tongue weight figure helps you and does not scare you to much. AS published tongue weights are on the light side. After all your travel junk is loaded in the best way is to head to the CAT scale to get a clear picture of your rig.

mtbmitch 05-26-2020 03:13 PM

I had a 2000 E-150 with the 4.6. Towed our first trailer, a used 2009 Rpod. Had 3.92 gears put in and beefed up the leaf springs. Upgraded to a Transit t250 with the 3.7. Pulls our Lance 1575 fine but will need to change to the 3.5 or install an electric supercharger on the Transit. Vans are great, leave the mountain bikes and or dirt bike and not worry about it. Thanks for the tongue weight numbers. Anything over 750 pound TW on the unibody Transit is not recommended. Neither are WDH's. The Chevy Express can tow 9900 pounds and has a GC weight of 16000 pounds.





Quote:

Originally Posted by uraljohn (Post 2363933)
According to my last 3 pass weigh in at a CAT scale the AS weighs right at 6400 LBS all loaded up and ready for travel. Tongue weight worked out to 960 LBS. Tow vehicle is a 2013 Ford E150 XLT Premium van with Factory Tow Package and the heavy duty 8600 LB GVW rating. The van weighs just over 6400 LBS also all loaded and ready for travel. Combined Gross Weight of rig was 12,862 LBS.

This E150 van is a rare find. Most E150 vans do not have the 8600 LB GVWR. It took me 6 months to find one of these vans. It is also highly optioned with just about everything you could get from the factory when it was built.

Hope the Tongue weight figure helps you and does not scare you to much. AS published tongue weights are on the light side. After all your travel junk is loaded in the best way is to head to the CAT scale to get a clear picture of your rig.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.