 |
|
02-24-2012, 06:55 PM
|
#1
|
3 Rivet Member 
1985 31' Limited
Nellysford
, Virginia
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 139
|
CAT scale results .. your thoughts
On our first real trip in our "new to us" 31 ft 1985 Limited I decided I would make a couple of runs as the scales.
Towing with a 2011 Suburban 2500.
First weighing was with empty TV and AS fitted out with only dishes, cookware and a few odds and ends. Pretty empty. I was not smart enough on that weighing to get a drive axle ans steer axle weights, so that kind of compounds the current situation.
Results: Steer axle 00, drive axle 7500; Trailer axle 6140, Total 13640.
Second weighing was on the way to Florida. WD bars set at what I believed to be a reasonable setting with front and rear TV movement. Trailer now loaded with clothes (wife does not pack light), food and misc. TV loaded with smarttote, tools, etc. Third row of seats taken out.
Results. Steer axle 3360, Drive axle 4320, Trailer axle 6540. Total 14,220
So TV weight was only 180 greater than empty and AS only 400 lbs more. ??? I was not happy with the set up, i.e. front and rear tire pressures were indicating more weight on rear axle and less on front.
On return trip I changed the WD set up by lift trailer and putting more wt on front of TV.
Results: steer axle 3440, drive axle 3980 (7420 total), trailer axle 6840. Total 14260
TV tire pressures (frnt vs rear) rose at about the same ratios (rear just slightly higher)
One observations is that it does not appear that we have over loaded the AS with "stuff". I was told in an earlier thread on tires that I would probably ad 1700 lbs of "stuff".........don't think so. I left the washer and dryer in the utility room at home. along with the upright freezer.
Any thoughts on these results?
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 08:32 PM
|
#2
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Well, buddy, you are off to the right start even if a step got skipped. The end result of dialing in the hitch rigging, IMO, is that the TV drives and steers pretty well as if it were solo. A goal worth working towards as maintaining lane center with no undue driver inputs is worth the effort. And the range of future adjustments -- barring a "new" TV or TT -- is then so small as to be worth it in itself: there's a narrow limit even for "major" changes to those vehicles or their loads. Peace of mind, IOW.
We start with the vehicle manufacturers guidelines, and Airstreams requirements. They are not the end of the story, but they are the beginning. Post 'em up.
I borrowed a chart from contributor Ron Gratz on Woodalls some time ago, and recommend it for the checks it provides. An "empty" TV weight (adjusted from factory shipping weight) is made with driver, full fuel and what remains permanently in truck. An "empty" TT weight is full water and propane, plus permanent trailer supplies (axles and TW). I like to have these prior to:
Ready for a trip, then onto the CAT Scale:
Weighing #1 -- TT attached and Weight Distribution Activated
Let Front Axle Load be "FA1"
Let Rear Axle Load be "RA1"
Let TT Axles Load be "TT1"
Then, while in same position on scales, take
Weighing #2 -- TT attached and Weight Distribution Not Activated
Let Front Axle Load be "FA2"
Let Rear Axle Load be "RA2"
Let TT Axles Load be "TT2"
Then, drive off scales and drop TT. Return to scales and take
Weighing #3 -- TV only -- TT Not Attached
Let Front Axle Load be "FA3"
Let Rear Axle Load be "RA3"
From the above values, you can calculate:
TV weight = FA3 + RA3
Gross Combined Weight = (FA1 + RA1 + TT1)
- should also be equal to (FA2 + RA2 + TT2) if scale weights are correct
TT Weight = Gross Combined Weight - TV Weight
Tongue Weight = (FA2 + RA2) - (FA3 + RA3)
Load Transferred to TT Axles
when WD System in Activated = TT1 - TT2
We none of us ever get this perfectly. But we can come real durn close. By coming as close as we can we can tweak back and forth on one or two adjustments till we are satisfied. It allows us to get TV tire pressure ideal (as that is always a pressure-versus-load problem) since TT tire pressure should always be sidewall maximum (or slightly higher) and doesn't change. Once dialled in it would be a quite large load change to have a corresponding TV tire pressure change trip-to-trip. The only real change is from solo to towing. Easy to maintain tire pressure even with load changes once one is "on vacation", IOW.
Steering control is everything. A washer or link here, a few psi there . . it is easily felt at the wheel.
Ideal hitch rigging also eliminates questions when some "new problem" is bothering our awareness. We want to take the effect of the trailer upon the tow vehicle out of consideration for problem diagnosis (so it's not just for running the roads, but keeping track of how that feels as the rig ages). Keeps the diagnosis decision tree simpler.
Two threads for your consideration:
From Post #50: The RobertCross Limited
and,
Finalcutjoe, with Diminished Hensley [Hitch] Performance?
Of course, anything written by 2Airishuman is worth your time, and especially so on hitch rigging. It isn't that one man is the authority, it is that 2Air has the full range of familarity with arguments (debates) on this subject and his links to other explanatory threads is unmatched.
Pictures of the rig and of hitch rigging (taken on level ground) are of benefit, and close-ups lend the experienced eyes around here the opportunity to question and critique (mainly each other, ha!). The Full Monte, my friend.
.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 09:05 PM
|
#3
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTurnConn
On our first real trip in our "new to us" 31 ft 1985 Limited I decided I would make a couple of runs as the scales.
Towing with a 2011 Suburban 2500.
First weighing was with empty TV and AS fitted out with only dishes, cookware and a few odds and ends. Pretty empty. I was not smart enough on that weighing to get a drive axle ans steer axle weights, so that kind of compounds the current situation.
Results: Steer axle 00, drive axle 7500; Trailer axle 6140, Total 13640.
Second weighing was on the way to Florida. WD bars set at what I believed to be a reasonable setting with front and rear TV movement. Trailer now loaded with clothes (wife does not pack light), food and misc. TV loaded with smarttote, tools, etc. Third row of seats taken out.
Results. Steer axle 3360, Drive axle 4320, Trailer axle 6540. Total 14,220
So TV weight was only 180 greater than empty and AS only 400 lbs more. ??? I was not happy with the set up, i.e. front and rear tire pressures were indicating more weight on rear axle and less on front.
On return trip I changed the WD set up by lift trailer and putting more wt on front of TV.
Results: steer axle 3440, drive axle 3980 (7420 total), trailer axle 6840. Total 14260
TV tire pressures (frnt vs rear) rose at about the same ratios (rear just slightly higher)
One observations is that it does not appear that we have over loaded the AS with "stuff". I was told in an earlier thread on tires that I would probably ad 1700 lbs of "stuff".........don't think so. I left the washer and dryer in the utility room at home. along with the upright freezer.
Any thoughts on these results?
|
There are quite a few ways to interpret your initial results. But without a full set of scale readings they are without enough foundation for even reasonable speculation.
That said, you might look at your TT axle weights and calculate what percentage of GVWR. When the wife and I full-timed in our earlier trailer a few years ago we were at .92 of maximum. A poll with a few doen responses on Woodalls showed (per Ron Gratz) that those respondin were at .85 of GVWR.
But we'd need the adjusted empty weight to make sense of it. And, as time-in-service lengthens, so ( automagically, in BartS words [I love that]) does the "empty" thus "loaded" weights increase.
The end result of WDH adjustments will be: about 60-75% of TW on Drive Axle where Steer Axle is returned to "Unhitched, but Loaded" value.
A Ron Gratz quote:
" .. However, when using weight distribution, not all of the TW is carried by the TV. With a properly sized and properly adjusted WDH, it is reasonable to assume that only about 75% of the TW is carried by the TV. This means it is reasonable to assume that the load added to the TV would be around 13%x75% = about 10% of the TT's loaded weight.
So, for your hypothetical 6500# TT, you could estimate that, when using a WDH, the TT would add about 650# to the load carried by the TV."
Slick, huh?
And . . . what's handy about all this is one can ignore the no-need-for-WDH crowd (getting my bow shot in early) as these are static measured values of a few hundred pounds standing in for what, potentially, can be many thousands of pounds of force. All applied at the wrong time. Distribution takes away the bad pressure points, so to speak. Loss of control is generally over-correction by the driver (it is surmised) so let's keep him within familiar territory (is the back story).
Onward.
.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 07:05 AM
|
#4
|
Rivet Master 
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,719
|
Geez, Rednax, I don't see anything wrong with your post at all. I don't think it's a bow shot. The only thing I'd do differently is, I don't travel with anymore water than necessary to flush the toilet and wash up from lunch, etc. So my "baseline" would be a little different than you prescribe. Good post!
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 09:51 AM
|
#5
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
I was having some fun with the idea out there, that, there's a hundred different opinions on how to set up a hitch, and, that one does not need WDH (for a variety of ill-considered [non] thoughts); thus, that our threads on these subjects degenerate from the outset. None of which is quite true, but apparently it salves those who won't/can't/don't want to read their way through.
Numbers are the standard that work.
.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 12:11 PM
|
#6
|
"Cloudsplitter"

2003 25' Classic
Houstatlantavegas
, Malebolgia
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20,285
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dznf0g
Geez, Rednax, I don't see anything wrong with your post at all. I don't think it's a bow shot. The only thing I'd do differently is, I don't travel with anymore water than necessary to flush the toilet and wash up from lunch, etc. So my "baseline" would be a little different than you prescribe. Good post!
|
dzn,
Just to illuminate...it's the TV loaded for camping un-hitched weight that will establish the amount of weight transfer needed on the steering axle....
KEEPING the TV/Trailer level when hitched with WD set and proper transfer is the goal.
Bob
__________________
I’m done with ‘adulting’…Let’s go find Bigfoot.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 12:31 PM
|
#7
|
Rivet Master 
2005 25' International CCD
Fleetwood
, North Carolina
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 688
|
Yeah Bob,
You hit the nail on the head -- the direct measure of proper weight distribution is the measure of the front and rear of the tow vehicle from the ground.
One suggestion is adjusting weight distribution so the front of the tow vehicle lower than "coupled without wd" heights and the rear of the tow vehicle between uncoupled and "coupled without wd" heights.
We can follow this simple guideline, then confirm with weight scales -- it's always worked for ours.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 12:51 PM
|
#8
|
3 Rivet Member 
1985 31' Limited
Nellysford
, Virginia
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamStreamr
Yeah Bob,
You hit the nail on the head -- the direct measure of proper weight distribution is the measure of the front and rear of the tow vehicle from the ground.
One suggestion is adjusting weight distribution so the front of the tow vehicle lower than "coupled without wd" heights and the rear of the tow vehicle between uncoupled and "coupled without wd" heights.
We can follow this simple guideline, then confirm with weight scales -- it's always worked for ours.
|
I just did a readjustment of my WD "settings"....increased the height of the ball from the ground and thus increased the number of chain links. Result was front end dropped 1/2" and rear end dropped 1". Not sure how much I can tweek that. I guess I could play around with the number of washers in the receiver..........I'll try your approach the next time I have the AS home.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 01:20 PM
|
#9
|
"Cloudsplitter"

2003 25' Classic
Houstatlantavegas
, Malebolgia
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20,285
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamStreamr
Yeah Bob,
You hit the nail on the head -- the direct measure of proper weight distribution is the measure of the front and rear of the tow vehicle from the ground.
One suggestion is adjusting weight distribution so the front of the tow vehicle lower than "coupled without wd" heights and the rear of the tow vehicle between uncoupled and "coupled without wd" heights.
We can follow this simple guideline, then confirm with weight scales -- it's always worked for ours.
|
Jim,
Measurements can work for an initial set-up.....
When we got the Hensley this procedure got us close.
Measure the truck height through the center of each wheel to the edge of the wheelhouse when loaded for trailering, on LEVEL ground.
Hook-up and measure again with NO tension on spring bars.
Adjust the bars to transfer about 1/2 the difference to the front axle.
Example: If you have a 4inch rear drop when hitched, adjust bars so 2inches are transferred to the front.
NOT a substitute for accurate CAT weights!!
Bob
__________________
I’m done with ‘adulting’…Let’s go find Bigfoot.
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 04:58 PM
|
#10
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Measurements = rough it in
Weight #'s = dialed in
|
|
|
02-25-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#11
|
Rivet Master 
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,719
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REDNAX
Measurements = rough it in
Weight #'s = dialed in
|
I agree.
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
02-26-2012, 10:14 PM
|
#12
|
Rivet Master 
2005 25' International CCD
Fleetwood
, North Carolina
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 688
|
We weigh 2X yearly and more when we reset or rebuild the hitch head. Not disagreeing on tuning with scale weights, but it seems wrong to start without properly setting it up by accurate measure. Yours was the first post to acknowledge this requirement is all I'm saying. Thanks.
Jim
http://dreamstreamr.com
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 07:06 AM
|
#13
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
This thread was linked in a recent discussion.
So, what's the story five years down the line?
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 08:23 AM
|
#14
|
Rivet Master 

2017 26' Flying Cloud
Tampa
, Florida
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 8,187
|
I once attended an RV rally where a company weighed your rig. You stopped, they placed super thin scales by every wheel, you pulled up on them and they read each, then mailed you the results. It was well worth the small fee to have every tire's weight. It led me to determine the correct tire pressure.
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 05:29 PM
|
#15
|
Rivet Master 
2015 28' Flying Cloud
Durango
, Colorado
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mollysdad
I once attended an RV rally where a company weighed your rig. You stopped, they placed super thin scales by every wheel, you pulled up on them and they read each, then mailed you the results. It was well worth the small fee to have every tire's weight. It led me to determine the correct tire pressure.
|
I did the same by borrowing a set of four racing scales from an auto enthusiast. Weighed at the four trailer wheels, then the tongue, hitched and unhitched. Significant differences right to left, front to rear on my FC23FB. Played with adding weight on the trailer rear bumper to simulate carrying bikes or a generator back there. Nice to do this in your own level driveway. Much more accurate, informative and convenient than dragging repeatedly through commercial CAT scales (done that too).
__________________
Safe Travels,
Joe & Joan Donnaway
Durango, CO
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 05:55 PM
|
#16
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamuJoe
I did the same by borrowing a set of four racing scales from an auto enthusiast. Weighed at the four trailer wheels, then the tongue, hitched and unhitched. Significant differences right to left, front to rear on my FC23FB. Played with adding weight on the trailer rear bumper to simulate carrying bikes or a generator back there. Nice to do this in your own level driveway. Much more accurate, informative and convenient than dragging repeatedly through commercial CAT scales (done that too).
|
The new telephone app makes the CAT Scale easier to use.
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 07:49 PM
|
#17
|
Rivet Master 
2006 23' Safari SE
Holly Lake Ranch
, Texas
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,794
|
I did CAT scales right after we got the Airstream but haven't gone again because really felt my travel trailer was in the way of the big rigs. Anyone else had similar experiences?
Dana
__________________
Dana and Olga
2006 Safari 23
2011 Tundra Double Cab
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 07:58 PM
|
#18
|
Half a Rivet Short
2017 30' Classic
2022 Interstate 24X
Carlisle
, Pennsylvania
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 16,904
|
Hi
If I felt uncomfortable at one of the local scales, I'd drive off to another one. Doesn't everybody have four of them within a few miles of home?
Actually it's worse than that. The trailer is stored 20 miles down the road. If I go out that far, the count goes up to six.
Bob
|
|
|
07-08-2017, 08:13 PM
|
#19
|
Rivet Master 

2012 27' Flying Cloud
W
, New England
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,402
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goal15
I did CAT scales right after we got the Airstream but haven't gone again because really felt my travel trailer was in the way of the big rigs. Anyone else had similar experiences?
Dana
|
Well - sure, you don't want to get on the way of commercial truckers. But it's just 3 measures. So you get there all hooked up with you WD loaded - so take that as your first run through. Then get off the scales, release the WD tension and circle back for your second measure. Then go park and unload the trailer and go back for your last solo tow vehicle measure. At that point, you've got the 3 key measures you need. You could always hitch back up and go back for a fourth measure with a bit more WD applied than before - now you'll really know how to dial it all in!
Just be quick and don't get in the way of commercial drivers. They'll be fine!
|
|
|
07-10-2017, 07:04 AM
|
#20
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Speaking as someone who is on those scales several times daily, you aren't in the way. No matter how many passes you make.
Sure, be mindful. Just do what needs doing.
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|