Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-18-2023, 04:17 PM   #601
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyForth View Post
Just to amplify the importance of evaluating the role of some of the above items on handling, there is this article:
https://rvdaily.com.au/the-length-of...ers-heres-why/

Low profile tires might seem an advantage, but they actually work against you. The interrelation of overhang / tow bar length, wheel base, and tire profile and their impact on handling are explored in this article.
Disagree that low profile tires necessarily work against you. Depends on the vehicle, and the tire. The goal is often increased sidewall stiffness, or cornering stiffness, which can be accomplished with a lower profile, a different construction, or higher inflation pressure.

It may be worth reviewing similar towing articles at the CanAm website. Your Australian link is based on different vehicles and different trailers. CanAm talk about the rear overhang to wheelbase ratio as being more important than either wheelbase or rear overhang by themselves. They also have specific tire recommendations, based on knowing the vehicles being used as tow vehicles, and your link appears to take a different tack.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 06:38 AM   #602
Sombrero
 
B.trudeau's Avatar
 
2018 30' Classic
St-Jérôme , Quebec
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by franklyfrank View Post
You are all missing the critical aspect of towing here.
Pulling a trailer as Wally has aptly demonstrated could be done with a Bicycle.
Stopping and navigating it down the highways, up and down mountains is all together a different proposition.
A semi tractor pulling a gross weight around 80k runs on 5 axels, 18 wheels with humongous Air brakes working in unison .
Add to that the strategically located rear trailer axels in comparison to a 30' Air Stream makes all the difference in safety.
And yes towing with a heavier TV with a long wheelbase is the safest setup.
This is where the " I an pull it with a xyz small vehicle is nonsensical.
And I don't care how good your Porsche Cayenne brakes are when that rear end of that AS begins its sway it will whip that Porsche around.
Modifying these light weight short wheel base vehicles for towing is unsafe.
Right! many people see things Like you! I know I do! but consider that people see and hear things and they take what works to their advantage ignoring basic facts that some of their interpretation has a potential to ruin their journey!
There are people out there modifying or solidifying the receiver/frame portion who think this will makes the Suv/car ok to tow!, towing 25 Ft + trailers with SUV's ie. Porsche, Mercedes, Denali, with short wheelbase and limited payload, adding air balloons to their suspension, replacing tires with ticker walls the list goes on! Most of these people ignore the real things which are the payload! of course other things comes into play but if Payload numbers are not working one should be doomed!
At a local event, I've seen a Lexus 450H from Ontario (payload in the +/- 1000, and towing capacity of 3500 Lbs) towing a 27 GT! This my friend is crazy and one has to be seriously disconnected to compromise the security of other road users!, I myself don't have any respect for this kind of ignorants!
__________________
God is the Sun
B.trudeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 06:56 AM   #603
4 Rivet Member
 
SallyForth's Avatar
 
2023 23' International
2023 27' International
Osprey , Florida
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 257
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
Disagree that low profile tires necessarily work against you. Depends on the vehicle, and the tire..
The point they are making is all tires have a fixed amount traction, in this case lateral forces are the issue. A low profile tire provides less feedback of lateral forces to the driver allowing them to unknowingly approach total loss of traction.

Personally, I consider the higher profile of stock truck tires part of the suspension system, and I am puzzled why some truck owners or dealers will swap out stock tires for extremely low profile tires to obtain a certain look.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0613.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	112.4 KB
ID:	438865  
__________________
“No matter where you go, there you are.” — B. Banzai
SallyForth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 07:18 AM   #604
2020 Globetrotter 25 FBT
 
GettinAway's Avatar
 
2020 25' Globetrotter
Wildwood , Missouri
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbo View Post
I don't think truck size is even on the list of causes of accidents. What truck you tow with does not cause any accident. However, having a larger truck helps you AVOID an accident much better than a smaller truck.
Much better? How much? Once again, I think it’s pretty far down on the list. If you keep yourself out of situations by driving defensively, and have your TV and trailer set up optimally, you’ll avoid most accidents. Many years of long distance motorcycle travel have made me a very defensive driver.
I’m sure towing with a one ton diesel is easier than with a half ton, but there’s far too many half ton trucks pulling many many trailers. If there was a significant disadvantage I think it would have become apparent by now.
__________________
2020 25GT FBT
2012 Toyota Tundra Dbl Cab, 5.7 4x4

Previous AS trailers: (04) 19’ Bambi, and (11) FC 23FB
GettinAway is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 10:45 AM   #605
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyForth View Post
The point they are making is all tires have a fixed amount traction, in this case lateral forces are the issue. A low profile tire provides less feedback of lateral forces to the driver allowing them to unknowingly approach total loss of traction.

Personally, I consider the higher profile of stock truck tires part of the suspension system, and I am puzzled why some truck owners or dealers will swap out stock tires for extremely low profile tires to obtain a certain look.
And if the tire squirms around too much then the combination will be less comfortable, and less safe. Your example can be mitigated against by not cornering at excessive speed.

Your photo appears to show a lifted truck, which is less stable due to higher CoG. Fashion tires won’t help, but are but one failing.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 10:53 AM   #606
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.trudeau View Post
At a local event, I've seen a Lexus 450H from Ontario (payload in the +/- 1000, and towing capacity of 3500 Lbs) towing a 27 GT! This my friend is crazy and one has to be seriously disconnected to compromise the security of other road users!, I myself don't have any respect for this kind of ignorants!
3500 lbs is a common receiver rating. I had an SUV with a hitch like that. But strengthening the receiver can improve it. Certainly the vehicle was far more capable than the stock receiver. I didn’t need different tires. Or airbags. The payload label was artificially low, but the true payload, arrived at by weighing the vehicle and subtracting that from the GVWR, was quite a bit higher. And I suggest that my SUV towed better than many pickups. It was certainly safer. And I never had to resort to calling those pickup drivers ignorant.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2023, 06:55 PM   #607
Rivet Master
 
2017 23' Flying Cloud
Bartlett , Tennessee
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
The payload label was artificially low, but the true payload, arrived at by weighing the vehicle and subtracting that from the GVWR, was quite a bit higher.
This statement, all by itself, is frightening.
__________________
Bobbo and Lin
2017 F-150 XLT 4x4 SuperCab 3.5l EcoBoost V6
2017 Flying Cloud 23FB "BobLin Along"
Bobbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 04:49 AM   #608
Sombrero
 
B.trudeau's Avatar
 
2018 30' Classic
St-Jérôme , Quebec
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyForth View Post
The point they are making is all tires have a fixed amount traction, in this case lateral forces are the issue. A low profile tire provides less feedback of lateral forces to the driver allowing them to unknowingly approach total loss of traction.

Personally, I consider the higher profile of stock truck tires part of the suspension system, and I am puzzled why some truck owners or dealers will swap out stock tires for extremely low profile tires to obtain a certain look.
well because people are ignorant, stupid and they like to follow trend! tire size, compounds, side armature are engineered to work with the triangulation of the wheels, messing around with these perimeters invalid all numbers! here in Quebec I see 3/4 ton truck with spacers all over the place, little they know this destroy the truck!
__________________
God is the Sun
B.trudeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 05:08 AM   #609
Sombrero
 
B.trudeau's Avatar
 
2018 30' Classic
St-Jérôme , Quebec
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
3500 lbs is a common receiver rating. I had an SUV with a hitch like that. But strengthening the receiver can improve it. Certainly the vehicle was far more capable than the stock receiver. I didn’t need different tires. Or airbags. The payload label was artificially low, but the true payload, arrived at by weighing the vehicle and subtracting that from the GVWR, was quite a bit higher. And I suggest that my SUV towed better than many pickups. It was certainly safer. And I never had to resort to calling those pickup drivers ignorant.
ignorant not in a bad sense, in the sense they ignore the information (Or they've been told otherwise) and think what they do is right!(I'm French might not use the right word? No offense but re-enforcing a hitch by welding extra parts to it further diminish the payload and even if your class 3 hitch can take it your SUV as a whole cannot!, Your SUV, its suspension, engine, brakes, options, weight all have been engineered as one, modifying a hitch is only one of multiple thing engineer consider in your payload calculation, you may find throughout your calculation that your Payload was artificially lowered but IMO one still need to go for the number on the door sill, In my owner manual its written all over the place in RED, Never exceed payload rating! This said, this man towing its 27 with a Lexus 450H is ok until things goes wrong! if that wrong happen in the US well...? I've said it in the threads previously, people are free to tow with whatever TV they like! at the end of the day one is responsible for its safety and everyone around!
__________________
God is the Sun
B.trudeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 10:34 AM   #610
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbo View Post
This statement, all by itself, is frightening.
I don’t understand what you would be frightened of.

The GVWR is what it is. See the door jamb label. The curb weight, with fuel and driver allowance, eg the same conditions the FMVSS use, was determined from a trip to the scales. Those two figures provided an actual calculated payload capacity.

The manufacturer of that vehicle, an SUV, had a variety of potential option weights to consider. They took an easier approach than varying the payload labels for each specific vehicle variant; they nominated a conservative payload that all variants would meet, printed it in their sales literature, and put it on all the door jamb labels. As such, all vehicles matched the sales literature. No need to call dealers to find out what the label on any one vehicle said.

We can only speculate as to their motives, but the simplest assumption is that they didn’t consider payload to be a marketing feature.

Is the above frightening?
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 10:45 AM   #611
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.trudeau View Post
ignorant not in a bad sense, in the sense they ignore the information (Or they've been told otherwise) and think what they do is right!(I'm French might not use the right word? No offense but re-enforcing a hitch by welding extra parts to it further diminish the payload and even if your class 3 hitch can take it your SUV as a whole cannot!, Your SUV, its suspension, engine, brakes, options, weight all have been engineered as one, modifying a hitch is only one of multiple thing engineer consider in your payload calculation, you may find throughout your calculation that your Payload was artificially lowered but IMO one still need to go for the number on the door sill, In my owner manual its written all over the place in RED, Never exceed payload rating! This said, this man towing its 27 with a Lexus 450H is ok until things goes wrong! if that wrong happen in the US well...? I've said it in the threads previously, people are free to tow with whatever TV they like! at the end of the day one is responsible for its safety and everyone around!
You don’t know what the vehicle can manage, you are assuming. The best way to confirm vehicle capacity is with scales.

My payload was determined with the label on the door jamb, specifically, the GVWR label.

If a vehicle meets all the vehicle numbers except the one on the receiver, then putting a different and stronger receiver on the vehicle can be a valid approach. That is why they sell aftermarket receivers.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 10:46 AM   #612
Rivet Master
 
gypsydad's Avatar
 
2017 28' Flying Cloud
2014 25' FB Flying Cloud
2008 25' Safari FB SE
Georgetown (winter)Thayne (summer) , Texas & Wyoming
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.trudeau View Post
ignorant not in a bad sense, in the sense they ignore the information (Or they've been told otherwise) and think what they do is right!(I'm French might not use the right word? No offense but re-enforcing a hitch by welding extra parts to it further diminish the payload and even if your class 3 hitch can take it your SUV as a whole cannot!, Your SUV, its suspension, engine, brakes, options, weight all have been engineered as one, modifying a hitch is only one of multiple thing engineer consider in your payload calculation, you may find throughout your calculation that your Payload was artificially lowered but IMO one still need to go for the number on the door sill, In my owner manual its written all over the place in RED, Never exceed payload rating! This said, this man towing its 27 with a Lexus 450H is ok until things goes wrong! if that wrong happen in the US well...? I've said it in the threads previously, people are free to tow with whatever TV they like! at the end of the day one is responsible for its safety and everyone around!
How true that...and if you have had your tow vehicle "modified" to haul a bigger load, by "beefing up" your hitch area, so you can tow outside of your vehicle original "max payload" rating. Should something fail due to towing beyond original Mfg. specs..."who you gonna call"?
__________________
Empty Nesters; Gypsies on the road!
2017 28' Twin Flying Cloud
2017 F250 King Ranch, 4X4, 6.7L, Blue-Ox WDH
Summer-Star Valley Ranch RV Resort (Thayne, WY); Winter-Sun City (Georgetown,TX)
gypsydad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 10:53 AM   #613
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsydad View Post
How true that...and if you have had your tow vehicle "modified" to haul a bigger load, by "beefing up" your hitch area, so you can tow outside of your vehicle original "max payload" rating. Should something fail due to towing beyond original Mfg. specs..."who you gonna call"?
The usual modification is to the receiver, not the vehicle. Typically it is to reinforce the mounting system to better manage the forces created from the use of WD equipment. Which many of us would argue makes the combination safer than not using WD equipment.

This doesn’t impact payload or what you can haul, leaving aside the slight weight of the reinforcement, rather it impacts what you can tow.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 11:53 AM   #614
Rivet Master
 
gypsydad's Avatar
 
2017 28' Flying Cloud
2014 25' FB Flying Cloud
2008 25' Safari FB SE
Georgetown (winter)Thayne (summer) , Texas & Wyoming
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
The usual modification is to the receiver, not the vehicle. Typically it is to reinforce the mounting system to better manage the forces created from the use of WD equipment. Which many of us would argue makes the combination safer than not using WD equipment.

This doesn’t impact payload or what you can haul, leaving aside the slight weight of the reinforcement, rather it impacts what you can tow.
Says you...and who are you? How does one "certify" modifying beyond OEM mfg. limits, and get it recertified for heavier load and safety?? How about all the other items which were selected based on the OEM limits of that vehicle, prior to the modification? Who is at fault here, should something fail; owner or someone here on the Forum suggesting it's ok? Just checking...
__________________
Empty Nesters; Gypsies on the road!
2017 28' Twin Flying Cloud
2017 F250 King Ranch, 4X4, 6.7L, Blue-Ox WDH
Summer-Star Valley Ranch RV Resort (Thayne, WY); Winter-Sun City (Georgetown,TX)
gypsydad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 12:02 PM   #615
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsydad View Post
Says you...and who are you? How does one "certify" modifying beyond OEM mfg. limits, and get it recertified for heavier load and safety?? How about all the other items which were selected based on the OEM limits of that vehicle, prior to the modification? Who is at fault here, should something fail; owner or someone here on the Forum suggesting it's ok? Just checking...
First, consider that tow ratings and payload ratings are two different things. Strengthening the receiver is about towing, not hauling cargo.

I never suggesting certifying a tow rating. The tow ratings that are published are certainly not certified. Some manufacturers follow the SAE J2807 test procedure guidelines, but those are entirely optional, and in any case the testing is all done by the manufacturers and self-reported. Pretty much the opposite of certification. And if you want to consider them certifications, then you need to address the elephant in the room, namely that they do not call for towing travel trailers, let alone Airstreams, and they only consider operation on a climb up to 40 mph. If you think of the tow rating as a certified rating, then exceeding the certified speed limit would certainly invalidate the rating.

My last two tow vehicles didn't have tow ratings published by the manufacturer, either in the owner's manual, the technical literature, or the door jamb. Yet the manufacturer sold a receiver hitch for each vehicle, through their parts department, and specific to each model, and it included a label to be affixed to the receiver that said that receiver had a rating. Not the vehicle.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 12:39 PM   #616
Rivet Master
 
2017 23' Flying Cloud
Bartlett , Tennessee
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
I don’t understand what you would be frightened of.

The GVWR is what it is. See the door jamb label. The curb weight, with fuel and driver allowance, eg the same conditions the FMVSS use, was determined from a trip to the scales. Those two figures provided an actual calculated payload capacity.
You are assuming that the payload rating is come to ONLY by subtracting the vehicle weight from the GVWR. It is dangerous to assume that the manufacturer had NO other considerations when arriving at the payload rating.
__________________
Bobbo and Lin
2017 F-150 XLT 4x4 SuperCab 3.5l EcoBoost V6
2017 Flying Cloud 23FB "BobLin Along"
Bobbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 02:35 PM   #617
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbo View Post
You are assuming that the payload rating is come to ONLY by subtracting the vehicle weight from the GVWR. It is dangerous to assume that the manufacturer had NO other considerations when arriving at the payload rating.
So you don’t agree with the FMVSS definition that refers to the information on the door jamb label?
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 05:31 PM   #618
3 Rivet Member
 
2023 27' Globetrotter
Sproat Lake , British Columbia
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 163
I've got $200K sitting on a couple of cheesy Dexter axles with place-your-bets trailer tires (225/75R15!!), located right beside each other, so one can take the other out when it blows, is rated at 7600 GVWR... "sticker "
Go to a 30 and that's 8800lbs on 225/75 R16s.

A market 1/2 ton TV with beefy 275/60R20's and 4000lbs certified per axle rating with proper springs and shocks, is supporting a total GVWR of 7000lbs.

So what I am worried about?
FMSports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2023, 08:14 PM   #619
Rivet Master
 
2017 23' Flying Cloud
Bartlett , Tennessee
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
So you don’t agree with the FMVSS definition that refers to the information on the door jamb label?
I realize my limitations. I realize that I don't know enough to agree or disagree. I realize that I don't know enough to second guess the vehicle manufacturer. I realize that I am not willing to risk my family's welfare to my guesswork. I suspect that some don't know their limitations. YMMV.
__________________
Bobbo and Lin
2017 F-150 XLT 4x4 SuperCab 3.5l EcoBoost V6
2017 Flying Cloud 23FB "BobLin Along"
Bobbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2023, 05:22 AM   #620
Sombrero
 
B.trudeau's Avatar
 
2018 30' Classic
St-Jérôme , Quebec
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcl View Post
You don’t know what the vehicle can manage, you are assuming. The best way to confirm vehicle capacity is with scales.

My payload was determined with the label on the door jamb, specifically, the GVWR label.

If a vehicle meets all the vehicle numbers except the one on the receiver, then putting a different and stronger receiver on the vehicle can be a valid approach. That is why they sell aftermarket receivers.
You are right I don't Know...but you are wrong because I don't assume, I never do!, that is why I rely on MFG notification and that notification is stamped on the door jam, passenger and cargo should never exceed this much load! lots of RV dealer claim to be specialist, and they will do whatever it takes to sell you one of their trailer...after doing all the work like beefing up your receiver and replacing your tires with low profile tire, do you get a signed certification from the dealer stating that this installation is ok to ignore MFG Notice and instruction and fine to go on the road with a trailer that goes beyond your tv ratings? are they liable as per the law for their installation? the specialist of Trailer is YOU and you only should know what you are capable of towing with the number on your door jam simple as that! you can interpret numbers all day long but at the end of the day you are responsible for your safety and the safety of people around you!
__________________
God is the Sun
B.trudeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2012 27 foot AirStream Classic - 1/2 ton vs 3/4 ton Truck Question westie 978 2011 - 2015 Classic (all lengths) 82 07-14-2018 09:43 AM
Hitch system for 3/4 ton or 1 ton truck (GMC) Crazycanucks Tow Vehicles 31 04-02-2017 07:13 AM
1/2 Ton Silverado enough? IceCactus Tow Vehicles 22 11-11-2007 07:47 PM
Insurance - When is enough enough Poprivet Insurance & Claims 6 06-27-2007 08:29 PM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.