Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-29-2013, 08:46 PM   #1
Rivet Master
 
Vintage Kin Owner
N/A , N/A
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 989
Images: 1
Benz GL as a tow vehicle

Hi all,

I am looking into buying an Airstream/Argosy. I would greatly appreciate your feedback on my tow vehicle/travel trailer set up.

First the tow vehicle:

2012 Benz GL 350 Bluetec
Engine: V6 turbo-diesel, horsepower: 210 HP, Torque: 400 ft-lb
Wheelbase: 121 inch
7500# towing capacity
600# hitch weight limit (for both weight carrying and weight distribution)
break controller: Tekonsha P3

A couple of things to note:

1) I know of several people who have reinforced the hitch on the GL (the weakest link it seems) and are towing 27 ft or 30 ft Airstreams. They are exceeding the 600# hitch weight though. I do not intend to take this path.

2) I have two choices when it comes to WDH/sway control: a) not use any, as GL has Air suspension (it is self leveling) and it also has built in trailer sway control, or b) Use a light hitch like Andersen (total hitch assembly weighs 50#), so I am left with 600-50=550# for the trailer tongue weight.

The trailers I am looking at (some vintage, some newer) have a dry weight of 4000# to 4500# and a dry hitch weight of 400# to 500#. I suspect the loaded tongue weight would exceed the 600# limit (as dry hitch weights are always under stated), so I plan to reduce the hitch weight by travelling with water tank half full. I expect the trailer weight to be around 5500# and the hitch weight to be 600# (11% of trailer weight on the tongue). The trailers I am considering are from 22 ft up to 28 ft long.

Does this setup seem reasonable? Any feedback/suggestions is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
rostam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 08:57 PM   #2
Rivet Master
 
TouringDan's Avatar

 
1966 24' Tradewind
1995 34' Excella
Lynchburg , Virginia
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,226
So far so good. I would talk to the expert, Andy at Can Amm, before you make any decisions.

Dan
TouringDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 09:14 PM   #3
4 Rivet Member
 
SafariSS's Avatar
 
2005 30' Safari
Houston Texas , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 480
I have the same tow vehicle but a 2011. I have not towed my safari 30 yet with it as I have ordered a nicer hitch, (still using my suburban). From talking with others that have set up a GL or Ml you should not rely on the airmatic for wieght distribution alone. You really need to send some wieght to the front axle for good handling. I cant wait to tow with it, great low end torque.

I have done alot of reading on these setups and seems that they made a hitch resesign in 2010, not sure what is different. While I like the idea of beefing the hitch the thing is the place everyone is reinforcing to is not particularly stout. It is just a stamped fairly thin piece.
SafariSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 09:29 PM   #4
Rivet Master
 
switz's Avatar

 
2014 31' Classic
2015 23' International
2013 25' FB International
Apache Junction , Arizona
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,223
Images: 9
I have a 2007 ML 320 CDI and had Andy's crew at CanAM do the hitch weld reinforcement. Click on my "Images" number below the avatar and there is a photo of the installation. The car was legal across the CAT scales towing the new empty 25FB international Serenity trailer home with a 1,150 pound tongue weight. Andy's settings and setup instructions were spot on.

Then we loaded the trailer with most of the camping "stuff" and filled the 39 gallon fresh water tank. We put the jack/stand and an air compressor in the rear of the car, filled the car fuel tank and the wife and then crossed the CAT scale again. This time the front axle was overloaded and the vehicle GVW was exceeded. That was the end of the towing this trailer with that car. The car remains my daily driver.

There is now a 2012 Dodge Ram 2500 with a Cummins diesel serving as the tow machine.
__________________
WBCCI Life Member 5123, AIR 70341, 4CU, WD9EMC

TV - 2012 Dodge 2500 4x4 Cummins HO, automatic, Centramatics, Kelderman level ride airbag suspension, bed shell

2014 31' Classic w/ twin beds, 50 amp service, 1000 watt solar system, Centramatics, Tuson TPMS, 12" disc brakes, 16" tires & wheels
switz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 09:54 PM   #5
4 Rivet Member
 
ddruker's Avatar
 
1999 27' Safari
Palo Alto , California
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 321
Images: 1
I may be one of those folks you are aware of. We have close to 7,500 miles pulling our 27 foot safari with our GL 350. It's been a great combo. We did reinforce the hitch receiver.
__________________
- Dan

1999 27' Airstream Safari + 2011 Mercedes GL 350 Turbo-diesel + 2021 Ford F150 Platinum Hybrid w/ 7,200 Watt Pro Power
ddruker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 07:20 AM   #6
Rivet Master
 
Vintage Kin Owner
N/A , N/A
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 989
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by SafariSS View Post
I have the same tow vehicle but a 2011. I have not towed my safari 30 yet with it as I have ordered a nicer hitch, (still using my suburban). From talking with others that have set up a GL or Ml you should not rely on the airmatic for wieght distribution alone. You really need to send some wieght to the front axle for good handling. I cant wait to tow with it, great low end torque.

I have done alot of reading on these setups and seems that they made a hitch resesign in 2010, not sure what is different. While I like the idea of beefing the hitch the thing is the place everyone is reinforcing to is not particularly stout. It is just a stamped fairly thin piece.
Yes, the hitch on the newer GLs is completely different than the hitch on the older GLs that had a recall and had to be reinforced. The current hitch looks very sturdy and has excessive welding everywhere.
rostam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 07:21 AM   #7
Rivet Master
 
Vintage Kin Owner
N/A , N/A
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 989
Images: 1
Thanks all for the replies. I appreciate it.
rostam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 11:26 AM   #8
Rivet Master
 
Belegedhel's Avatar
 
1973 21' Globetrotter
Houston , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,322
I'm keen to understand all of the hitch reinforcement talk with the GL. I recently bought a 2008 GL320 with the intention of towing my '73 Globetrotter, so trailer weight and hitch weight should not be a problem with the factory setup. I bought my vehicle used, and the PO didn't get the hitch installed as an option. I understand it is a ~$500 option, but to buy one from the dealer and have it installed gets you close to $2000!!!!

Anyway, a week or so back, I bought what is supposed to be the latest and greatest official Mercedes factory hitch from a dealer that does business online. I don't think the hitch looks particularly beefy--will post pictures of it when I get back to the house. I have seen pics of a hitch off of a 2007 that looks a lot beefier--and I understand these are the ones that were subject to the "recall."

I have read a lot about folks having welding done on their GL hitches to "beef them up," but still wonder what is the basis for this beefing. Do they not believe the hitch is rated to what Mercedes claims? Do they just think it "looks" wimpy? My concern is that a factory hitch may have been welded into an assembly, and then the whole assembly heat treated to relieve stresses/establish uniform metal characteristics. If you start arbitrarily welding away on it, you are wrecking the temper of the metal in some areas.

If you are looking to beef up the hitch to get you a greater than 600 lb tongue weight, then I question whether you have simply chosen the wrong vehicle for the size of your trailer. You might be able to remanufacture your hitch to bear 1000 lbs of hitch weight, but the vehicle wasn't engineered to deal with that weight. Ya, ya, I know that there are people pulling semi-trailers with Minis, but just be cause you can make it work, doesn't mean that you should.

I also saw reference to the air suspension on the GL above. My understanding is that if your hitch electronics are properly installed, the trailer electronics are routed through the rear SAM module, and the truck knows there is a trailer in tow and 1) disables the air suspension, and 2) adjusts the stability parameters. Again, overloading the hitch seems risky as the effects on stability controls are unknown, and an option to use air leveling should not exist if things are wired properly.
Belegedhel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 12:10 PM   #9
Rivet Master
 
Road Ruler's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
St. Catharines , South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,367
Images: 38
Note that many factory receiver on a variety of vehicles are marginal, or very inadequate.
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
Road Ruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:45 PM   #10
4 Rivet Member
 
ddruker's Avatar
 
1999 27' Safari
Palo Alto , California
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 321
Images: 1
The air suspension is most certainly not disabled when towing. But yes the truck is very much aware when the wiring harness is connected to a trailer...

As far as hitch receiver reinforcement? For me it was about peace of mind.
__________________
- Dan

1999 27' Airstream Safari + 2011 Mercedes GL 350 Turbo-diesel + 2021 Ford F150 Platinum Hybrid w/ 7,200 Watt Pro Power
ddruker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:10 PM   #11
Rivet Master
 
MrUKToad's Avatar
 
2011 28' International
Chatham , Ontario
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,401
Images: 17
Blog Entries: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belegedhel View Post

I have read a lot about folks having welding done on their GL hitches to "beef them up," but still wonder what is the basis for this beefing. Do they not believe the hitch is rated to what Mercedes claims? Do they just think it "looks" wimpy? My concern is that a factory hitch may have been welded into an assembly, and then the whole assembly heat treated to relieve stresses/establish uniform metal characteristics. If you start arbitrarily welding away on it, you are wrecking the temper of the metal in some areas.

If you are looking to beef up the hitch to get you a greater than 600 lb tongue weight, then I question whether you have simply chosen the wrong vehicle for the size of your trailer. You might be able to remanufacture your hitch to bear 1000 lbs of hitch weight, but the vehicle wasn't engineered to deal with that weight. Ya, ya, I know that there are people pulling semi-trailers with Minis, but just be cause you can make it work, doesn't mean that you should.
I can't speak specifically for the Benz hitches but my minivan aftermarket hitch was beefed up with the addition of two three feet long pieces of steel, welded to the hitch just behind the receiver box and bolted to the car's body at point just behind the rear axle. The modification has three benefits:

1. I now have three anchoring points rather than two.

2. The hitch is now more rigid and helps resist the torque when the weight distribution system is active.

3. In resisting the torque, weight is better transferred to the front axle.

I'd guess that the Benz would benefit in much the same way.

I liked your point about just buying a tow vehicle that can cope with the load without having to modify it. I think many people do just that. Others, though, only use their vehicle to tow for a fraction of the time and look to use something that is smaller and more fuel efficient for the bulk of their driving. It's then, I think, that a well modified and set up smaller vehicle really becomes a practical proposition.

As an aside, I'd just like to register my (not entirely serious) indignation that the spec on the OP's Benz isn't wildly different from my minivan and yet its tow rating is twice as high!
__________________
Steve; also known as Mr UK Toad

"You can't tow that with that!"

https://sites.google.com/view/towedhaul/home
MrUKToad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 06:21 AM   #12
Rivet Master
 
Vintage Kin Owner
N/A , N/A
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 989
Images: 1
I think the main problem is that modern Airstreams are heavy (especially VERY tongue heavy), and not too many of them can be towed by SUVs (barring Suburbans/Expeditions). Airstream used to make light trailers in 60's and 70's. Why can't they build light trailers now (with all the advances in the technology), is beyond me.

I really think Airstream should revive the Argosy brand of the 70's. Argosys used to be the lighter and the less expensive Airstream. I believe there is a market for such trailers now a days, as not everyone can pay $80K for a trailer and buy 3/4 ton diesel truck just dedicated to towing the trailer.
rostam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 07:37 AM   #13
Rivet Master
 
MrUKToad's Avatar
 
2011 28' International
Chatham , Ontario
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,401
Images: 17
Blog Entries: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by rostam View Post
I think the main problem is that modern Airstreams are heavy (especially VERY tongue heavy), and not too many of them can be towed by SUVs (barring Suburbans/Expeditions). Airstream used to make light trailers in 60's and 70's. Why can't they build light trailers now (with all the advances in the technology), is beyond me.

I really think Airstream should revive the Argosy brand of the 70's. Argosys used to be the lighter and the less expensive Airstream. I believe there is a market for such trailers now a days, as not everyone can pay $80K for a trailer and buy 3/4 ton diesel truck just dedicated to towing the trailer.
I wouldn't disagree that Airstreams are heavy, and expensive, but they are still the best towing travel trailers on the road. Because they tow so well, it's perfectly feasible to tow large Airstreams with cars, minivans and SUVs, many people do, but just not straight off the auto dealer's lot or without some modification. I guess it's how you intend to use your vehicle when you're not towing that's the real key to the issue. Happy towing!
__________________
Steve; also known as Mr UK Toad

"You can't tow that with that!"

https://sites.google.com/view/towedhaul/home
MrUKToad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 07:48 AM   #14
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 12,111
I always thought Argosy were basically painted Airstreams...
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 04:59 PM   #15
Rivet Master
 
Vintage Kin Owner
N/A , N/A
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 989
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belegedhel View Post
I'm keen to understand all of the hitch reinforcement talk with the GL. I recently bought a 2008 GL320 with the intention of towing my '73 Globetrotter, so trailer weight and hitch weight should not be a problem with the factory setup. I bought my vehicle used, and the PO didn't get the hitch installed as an option. I understand it is a ~$500 option, but to buy one from the dealer and have it installed gets you close to $2000!!!!

Anyway, a week or so back, I bought what is supposed to be the latest and greatest official Mercedes factory hitch from a dealer that does business online. I don't think the hitch looks particularly beefy--will post pictures of it when I get back to the house. I have seen pics of a hitch off of a 2007 that looks a lot beefier--and I understand these are the ones that were subject to the "recall."

I have read a lot about folks having welding done on their GL hitches to "beef them up," but still wonder what is the basis for this beefing. Do they not believe the hitch is rated to what Mercedes claims? Do they just think it "looks" wimpy? My concern is that a factory hitch may have been welded into an assembly, and then the whole assembly heat treated to relieve stresses/establish uniform metal characteristics. If you start arbitrarily welding away on it, you are wrecking the temper of the metal in some areas.

If you are looking to beef up the hitch to get you a greater than 600 lb tongue weight, then I question whether you have simply chosen the wrong vehicle for the size of your trailer. You might be able to remanufacture your hitch to bear 1000 lbs of hitch weight, but the vehicle wasn't engineered to deal with that weight. Ya, ya, I know that there are people pulling semi-trailers with Minis, but just be cause you can make it work, doesn't mean that you should.

I also saw reference to the air suspension on the GL above. My understanding is that if your hitch electronics are properly installed, the trailer electronics are routed through the rear SAM module, and the truck knows there is a trailer in tow and 1) disables the air suspension, and 2) adjusts the stability parameters. Again, overloading the hitch seems risky as the effects on stability controls are unknown, and an option to use air leveling should not exist if things are wired properly.
Attached are some photos of the hitch on our 2012 GL. Looks very different than the recalled hitch on older GLs (I had seen those in a Benz forum).
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0466.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	132.6 KB
ID:	187001   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0467.jpg
Views:	202
Size:	109.2 KB
ID:	187002  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0468.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	121.2 KB
ID:	187003   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0469.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	120.9 KB
ID:	187004  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	153
Size:	127.3 KB
ID:	187005   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0471.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	136.5 KB
ID:	187006  

rostam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013, 06:10 AM   #16
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 12,111
Is the Merceds GL unibody construction? I like towing with a body on frame vehicle better simply because there is less noise transferred from the trailer coupling to the passenger cabin. Towing with my Nissan Pathfinder is a noisy experience because the passenger compartment seems to amplify the sounds of the trailer coupler jiggling around on bumpy road surfaces. I have tried wedging small pieces of rubber between the shank and receiver. This just muffles the noise a little bit. I guess you don't hear the noise as much on body on frame construction vehicles is that the receiver is mounted to the frame and the body is mounted on rubber or some form of isolator.
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013, 07:14 AM   #17
Rivet Master
 
murreywalker's Avatar
 
2013 25' FB Flying Cloud
2011 23' FB Flying Cloud
Branson , Missouri
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 734
Images: 1
Mine is strictly anecdotal.

I towed my 2011 23 FB with an '08 320 Bluetec for a couple of months, then traded for a 2011 MB 450.

IMO, the hitch was not the issue. BUT, I slowly realized the subtle differences in the shifting of the transmission 1 1/2 year later. AND my wife agreed. Granted, the Ozarks geography we live in requires a lot of uphill towing.

Now this might be specific to the particular vehicle I owned at the time, but I would caution against anything larger than a 23 FB and the GL, even with the hitch rebuilt.

Most SUVs are not designed to tow heavy duty payloads.
__________________
2013 25 FC FB (Twin)
2013 Suburban 2500

https://www.pbase.com/murreywalker

2011 23 FC FB
murreywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013, 07:22 AM   #18
Rivet Master
 
Belegedhel's Avatar
 
1973 21' Globetrotter
Houston , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,322
Rostam--Yes, the hitch I just bought looks like the one you have installed--not like the earlier model.

M. Hony--Yes, the GL is a unibody construction. I've heard arguments both ways as to whether a body on frame design is better for four-wheeling and/or towing. Or whether a unibody is better because of its overall stiffness. Suffice to say, the GL is a stiff body, and my purchase of it was focused on getting a good sized SUV with a diesel engine so that I could get 25 mpg on the highway for the 95%n of the time it won't be towing, and still get decent towing performance when I have a trailer hooked to it.
Belegedhel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013, 07:27 AM   #19
3 Rivet Member
 
panheaddale's Avatar
 
1964 26' Overlander
1968 30' Sovereign
Vintage Kin Owner
somewhere , Tennessee
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 211
I am glad people on here are finally starting to realize that towing with these new downsized suv is not the way to go. Emperiorr andy will eventually get someone hurt or killed overloading these suv and telling people they can tow with no problems. If DOT ever starts enforcing laws on the general public like they do on us that tow for a living they would make alot of money off of people that are more worried about comfort and status than safety in their tow vehicles.
panheaddale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013, 09:48 AM   #20
Rivet Master
 
Belegedhel's Avatar
 
1973 21' Globetrotter
Houston , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,322
I agree--and I would add that I bought the GL320 as an upgrade to my previous tow vehicle which had a max capacity of 5000 lbs and 500 lbs tongue weight. The GL will be more than adequate with its 7500 lb capacity to tow my 21 ft long '73 GT. I think the vehicle is a good balance of functionality, utility, and capability, unaltered, and without exceeded published specs. I would not advocate buying one with the thought in mind of exceeding what it is designed for. It is the right tool for the job, but you have to consider the job.

I did not buy the vehicle for "status." The Domestic and Japanese automakers have absolutely missed the boat by not offering a good sized SUV with a diesel engine in the US market. I waited to buy a new vehicle for almost two years on the rumor that the Dodge Durango would be offered with a diesel engine, but the latest I have heard is that that plan is scrapped, and that Dodge will likely abandon that line. So if I want three rows of seats, a diesel engine, and reasonable gas mileage, my choices are made by Mercedes, BMW, and Audi. If I give up the third row of seats, I can get a VW Tuareg, Mercedes ML, Audi, or BMW. Recently, Jeep started offering the Grand Cherokee with a Diesel engine, but the price tag of the new Jeep is well above what I paid for my lightly used Mercedes, I give up the third row of seats, and the Cherokee is built on a Mercedes ML platform anyway.
Belegedhel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.