Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-16-2025, 08:50 AM   #1
Rivet Master
 
farafield's Avatar
 
2018 16' Sport
Charlotte , Vermont
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 734
Images: 1
Replacing Atkinson solar controller

I bought a new controller that is supposed to do a better job of charging. However, it doesn't seem to be as straightforward to change out as I'd hoped, me being a non-electrician. Pictures show existing unit (notice how the wires attach to a "post." New unti (no post). ***Asking honestly***, why would Atkinson make the new unit similar to the old one where one could easily hook up the new one, no splicing? I called them but didn't really understand what they said. Thanks.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1286.JPG
Views:	8
Size:	107.7 KB
ID:	454130   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1284.JPG
Views:	12
Size:	126.9 KB
ID:	454131  

__________________
Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy...

Kim
Charlotte, VT
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Flash, ext. range; Bramble: 2018 Bambi Sport 16
farafield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2025, 09:07 AM   #2
Rivet Master
 
2021 30' Flying Cloud
Sioux Falls , South Dakota
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,739
Kim, I'll try to answer your question. It looks like your original controller has two posts for attaching cables, and your new one has you insert the wires into a "hole." You are wondering why the change.


Using posts, you have to crimp a terminal onto the wire, then tighten that terminal to the post. The post is exposed, so there is a possibility of someone or something touching both connection points accidentally. That's not a good idea! Using the "hole" method, you simply insert the wires into the proper point and tighten the screw. That screw is usually recessed, at least a little bit, so that it is harder to accidentally touch both terminals. Somewhat safer.


I have both types of connections, and both work well. With either one you have to make sure that connections stay tight. Generally, if a terminal is properly crimped on it won't ever come loose. It has been known to happen, though, that a terminal appeared to be properly crimped on, but wasn't, and later came loose. Good to check every connection point regularly.
__________________
David Lininger, kb0zke
7490
2021 Flying Cloud 30 RBQ
kb0zke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2025, 04:37 AM   #3
Rivet Master
 
farafield's Avatar
 
2018 16' Sport
Charlotte , Vermont
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 734
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by kb0zke View Post
Kim, I'll try to answer your question. It looks like your original controller has two posts for attaching cables, and your new one has you insert the wires into a "hole." You are wondering why the change.


Using posts, you have to crimp a terminal onto the wire, then tighten that terminal to the post. The post is exposed, so there is a possibility of someone or something touching both connection points accidentally. That's not a good idea! Using the "hole" method, you simply insert the wires into the proper point and tighten the screw. That screw is usually recessed, at least a little bit, so that it is harder to accidentally touch both terminals. Somewhat safer.


I have both types of connections, and both work well. With either one you have to make sure that connections stay tight. Generally, if a terminal is properly crimped on it won't ever come loose. It has been known to happen, though, that a terminal appeared to be properly crimped on, but wasn't, and later came loose. Good to check every connection point regularly.
Thanks so much for your response. I don't see what you mean by holes to insert the wire into. The new one has wires coming out and I think I have to cut off the terminals and splice them to the wires that exist. They do have these "connections" midway up the wire. Could these be an alternative to splicing???
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1287.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	75.5 KB
ID:	454179  
__________________
Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy...

Kim
Charlotte, VT
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Flash, ext. range; Bramble: 2018 Bambi Sport 16
farafield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2025, 09:52 PM   #4
3 Rivet Member
 
Glen Carter's Avatar
 
2018 19' Tommy Bahama
Downey , CA
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 216
I was having all sorts of charging reliability issues with my Atkinson, so I replaced it with a Victron MPPT and a BMV-712 monitor. No issues after that.
Glen Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing Atkinson solar charge controller with Victron MPPT ClaudiaU Generators & Solar Power 4 12-24-2023 06:19 AM
Atkinson MPT Solar Controller Sunexplorer Display - Virginia Shiny72 Airstream Classifieds 0 09-28-2021 04:01 PM
Upgrading the solar charge controller from Atkinson to MPPT FlyFishinRVr Sprinter and B-van Forum 107 08-28-2020 06:31 PM
Atkinson Solar controller swilly43 Electrical - Systems, Generators, Batteries & Solar 2 01-07-2018 05:49 PM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.