|
|
03-11-2015, 07:11 PM
|
#1
|
2 Rivet Member
2014 27' FB International
Avila Beach
, California
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 63
|
Solar, it just can't be that complicated?
Gang,
First, I sincerely apologize for the extremely long question/problem.
I hope to explain our problem correctly; if I misuse certain terms forgive me please.
On our 2014 27ft FB International we have a ZAMP 100 watt solar panel installed on the roof. The panel runs through a controller mounted inside the trailer.
We desired to add an additional 120 watt portable ZAMP panel and were told by the ZAMP folks that the new unit should not be regulated as one controller will override the other and not provide the 220 watts we desired. Case made, we bought the unregulated portable and the quick connect that was supposedly going to be an easy install.
We took the trailer to a dealer to have the quick connect installed on the outside of the trailer and wired into the existing controller, which controller by the way is able to handle 450 watts. We were then told that things are not that easy.
Here’s the issue, per the dealer, in order to do it right, we would have to remove panels and pull wire through studs, because the link point where the quick connect needs to be installed must be on the solar side of the controller. Linking up near the battery will be on the battery side of the charge controller. All solar panel wires must first go to the controller. The line going from the controller to the battery is already installed, and can not be tapped into.
Have any of you had experience with this sort of thing, if so, can you offer some insight?
__________________
Logrider
"don't let life get in the way of living"
|
|
|
03-11-2015, 07:20 PM
|
#2
|
4 Rivet Member
Commercial Member
2009 30' Classic
Melbourne, FL
, Searsport, ME
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 309
|
Lewster........where are you?
|
|
|
03-11-2015, 07:32 PM
|
#3
|
Rivet Master
2002 30' Classic S/O
Fleming Island
, Florida
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,673
|
If both panels are on the roof and have isolation diodes or inherent protection can't the two panels just be connected in parallel? If the controller can stand the maximum output voltage, the panels could be connected in series. Either of these alternatives could be implemented on the roof, I think.
Lewster????
Al
__________________
“You cannot reason someone out of a position they have not been reasoned into"
Al, K5TAN and Missy, N4RGO WBCCI 1322
2002 Classic 30 Slideout -S/OS #004
2013 Dodge 2500 Laramie 4x4 Megacab Cummins
|
|
|
03-11-2015, 10:00 PM
|
#5
|
Rivet Master
1965 17' Caravel
1983 27' Excella
Walnut Grove/Laguna Woods
, California
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,635
|
Your new unregulated panel needs to be connected to the positive and negative lines leading from your existing panel to the existing controller or to the controller input where your existing panel connects.
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 08:06 AM
|
#6
|
Rivet Master
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoldAdventure
|
If you mean, hooking solo directly to the batt---it'll work fine (with attached ZAMP controller).
But, I think the wires are too small a gauge (another story).
But if you mean, hooking directly to battery, in parallel WITH another on-board system, I think one of the systems will be ineffective or operate at a reduced capability. I think, if you have two controllers charging the batts, unless they are charging at EXACTLY the same voltage (unlikely), you will have a potential difference in the charge lines and reduce or negate the amperage flow from one of the solar systems.
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 08:45 AM
|
#7
|
Figment of My Imagination
2012 Interstate Coach
From All Over
, More Than Anywhere Else
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,868
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dznf0g
If you mean, hooking solo directly to the batt---it'll work fine (with attached ZAMP controller).
I think, if you have two controllers charging the batts, unless they are charging at EXACTLY the same voltage (unlikely), you will have a potential difference in the charge lines and reduce or negate the amperage flow from one of the solar systems.
|
There should be a blocking diode for the solar panel to prevent back-feeding current from the stronger charging source when both are running at once. Should be integrated into the controller, but check to make sure.
__________________
I thought getting old would take longer!
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 08:51 AM
|
#8
|
Rivet Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,190
|
too late now
I haven't done your math….But you may have went the wrong direction. Buying additional panels isn't always the best way to beef up your solar system. More batteries can be the best and or easiest. Too little battery storage is often the weak link. The old adage, " Strike while the iron is hot " translates to " Gather while the sun is hot ". Having one battery fully charged while the sun is still high, could be the problem.
And yeah those wires look too thin. voltage drop and overheating are the issues
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 08:51 AM
|
#9
|
Rivet Master
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protagonist
There should be a blocking diode for the solar panel to prevent back-feeding current from the stronger charging source when both are running at once. Should be integrated into the controller, but check to make sure.
|
Yes, that would prevent potential damage to the lower voltage output controller and its panels, but to be clear, the lower voltage "system" would be ineffective at charging the batts while both are hooked up...correct?
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 09:00 AM
|
#10
|
Rivet Master
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,669
|
Just as an FYI, here are the mods I made to the Zamp 160 watt system to make it more effective and efficient:
http://www.airforums.com/forums/f448...ar-124920.html
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 09:09 AM
|
#11
|
Figment of My Imagination
2012 Interstate Coach
From All Over
, More Than Anywhere Else
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,868
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dznf0g
Yes, that would prevent potential damage to the lower voltage output controller and its panels, but to be clear, the lower voltage "system" would be ineffective at charging the batts while both are hooked up...correct?
|
Correct.
__________________
I thought getting old would take longer!
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 09:10 AM
|
#12
|
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
Vintage Kin Owner
Naples
, Florida
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,508
|
OK
First, most dealers are almost totally clueless about proper solar installation. I have no axe to grind with Zamp, but they do not offer fully integrated systems that are easily expandable.
Most newer design panels have their diodes already mounted into the junction box adhered to the back of each panel.
The biggest loss in many systems is found in the insufficient wire used for connection from panels to controller and then again from controller to batteries. In addition, there is always measurable voltage drop in EVERY MC-4 connector that Zamp, Go Power and a host of other 'kit' suppliers insist on using. These connectors provide ease of installation and not much else.
Two separate charging systems will not increase the available charging amperage to your batteries unless they are designed to compliment each other. I recently finished a 2000 watt solar array on a Winnebago MoHo that used 3 separate Blue Sky 3024 charge controllers in parallel operated thru a single iPN remote panel (it can regulate up to 8 solar charge controllers).
These controllers worked together seamlessly to provide up to 120 charging amps to the battery bank.
Separate charge controllers NOT designed to work together as the above are will simply yield to one or the other. One will 'see' the charging voltage from controller #1 as a full battery and controller #2 will effectively be in standby mode.
I suggest you find someone who has a good working knowledge of solar charging systems to sort out your problems.
PS: I NEVER attempt to pull wire or cable between the inner and outer skins. There are plenty of other opportunities for proper, invisible cable placement on Airstreams if you know where to look !!
Lew Farber
RVIA/RVDA Nationally Certified Master Tech
Master Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
AM Solar Certified Installation Center
Lifeline Batteries**Magnum Inverters
541-490-6357
__________________
lewster
Solar Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
Victron Solar Components and Inverters, Zamp Solar Panels, LiFeBlue and Battle Born Lithium Batteries, Lifeline AGM Batteries
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 09:16 AM
|
#13
|
Rivet Master
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,669
|
Thanks, Lew
Just out of curiosity, and maybe this isn't the place for it....what is the advantage of the system you describe with 3 controllers in parallel and running through an iPN panel...as opposed to three panel (arrays?) wired in parallel to a single large capacity controller? Is there no controller large enough for the load desired in the above system?
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 10:22 AM
|
#14
|
Full Time Adventurer
2007 27' International CCD FB
Nomadic
, USA
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,748
|
So how does one go about adding a portable panel to an existing system? I kind of like the idea of adding a ground panel I can move around to my current 405w of roof panels from AMSolar.
__________________
Family of 5 exploring the USA with a Ram Power Wagon & Airstream in tow.
OUR BLOG | INSTAGRAM
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 10:25 AM
|
#15
|
4 Rivet Member
1976 25' Caravanner
Salt Lake City
, Utah
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewster
PS: I NEVER attempt to pull wire or cable between the inner and outer skins. There are plenty of other opportunities for proper, invisible cable placement on Airstreams if you know where to look !!
|
Lew, I'm assuming that it's okay to run said cable in the wall (ie., between the inner and out skins) when the inner skin has been removed during remodeling or reconstruction. Correct?
And thanks again for your time and shared knowledge.
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 11:04 AM
|
#16
|
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
Vintage Kin Owner
Naples
, Florida
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,508
|
Absolutely no problem if the inner skin is off. It's almost impossible to fish cables once they are on.....especially with the newer units.
Lew Farber
RVIA/RVDA Nationally Certified Master Tech
Master Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
AM Solar Certified Installation Center
Lifeline Batteries**Magnum Inverters
541-490-6357
__________________
lewster
Solar Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
Victron Solar Components and Inverters, Zamp Solar Panels, LiFeBlue and Battle Born Lithium Batteries, Lifeline AGM Batteries
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 11:06 AM
|
#17
|
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
Vintage Kin Owner
Naples
, Florida
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,508
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoldAdventure
So how does one go about adding a portable panel to an existing system? I kind of like the idea of adding a ground panel I can move around to my current 405w of roof panels from AMSolar.
|
Separate system with it's own controller. With your roof system from AM Solar, you can easily disconnect the roof system when the trailer is in the shade and run the portable unit.
Lew Farber
RVIA/RVDA Nationally Certified Master Tech
Master Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
AM Solar Certified Installation Center
Lifeline Batteries**Magnum Inverters
541-490-6357
__________________
lewster
Solar Tech Energy Systems, Inc.
Victron Solar Components and Inverters, Zamp Solar Panels, LiFeBlue and Battle Born Lithium Batteries, Lifeline AGM Batteries
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 11:10 AM
|
#18
|
Rivet Master
2008 25' Classic
Full Time
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,309
|
I wish someone made a portable panel system with a separate controller not mounted on the panels. Then you could just connect it to the solar controller in the trailer, using an Anderson connector.
I would like to see something like that with the ability to patch, in parallel, a second portable set of panels to increase the watts, given the controller in the trailer is set to handle the additional amps.
I guess you could make something like this out of bulk panels but then there is the extra work to find hinges, folding leg assemblies, fabricating carrying cases etc.
Kelvin
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 11:43 AM
|
#19
|
Rivet Master
2007 30' Classic
Oswego
, Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,669
|
http://www.airforums.com/forums/f448...ar-124920.html
Kelvin, see my link above. I removed mine and now keep it separate from the panel suitcase. I used Anderson's and now have several configurations of portability and applications I can use it with.
__________________
-Rich-
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
|
|
|
03-12-2015, 12:07 PM
|
#20
|
Rivet Master
2008 25' Classic
Full Time
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,309
|
Yes, I'm more than likely going to go that route. Not sure if I'm going to remove the controller to inside the Airstream. My batteries are in the A frame. So I would have to mount the controller under the front bed and run two sets of cable from the controller, one pair to the batteries and one pair to an Anderson cable to plug in the panel. Not sure its worth all that to gain a little voltage. I'm thinking of spending a little more for the 200w panel kit and just use better cabling like you did from the panels to the batteries but leaving the controller on the panels.
Kelvin
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|