Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-29-2018, 09:12 PM   #1
Rivet Master
ITSNO60's Avatar
Currently Looking...
Tucson , AZ
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 893
An interesting read

about tow vehicle selection in the US compared to other countries

ITSNO60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 11:07 AM   #2
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
Images: 1
Quite a few factors missing. But a better article than most do on RVs.

Euros don’t allow WDH. Not Invented Here.

And the SAE stuff doesn’t take into account other than pickups, for the most part. (Emphasis on TV weight. But not the point where it becomes an enormous penalty due to both center of gravity and steering related wheelbase problems. Then, of suspension sophistication). So testing is purposefully limited (ignore embarrassing questions); or ignored entirely for full classes of otherwise adequate tow vehicles (generic 1k or 2k “tow ratings”: means, “not tested”; as test procedures would have to be re-written) .

And more besides.

IOW, far too much is missing despite a decent start to arrive (stop) at article conclusions.


slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 07:49 PM   #3
Rivet Master
MrUKToad's Avatar
2011 28' International
Chatham , Ontario
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,376
Images: 17
Blog Entries: 13
There's also the marketing aspect in North America. People in this continent love big vehicles, and big engines in their big vehicles. The motor manufacturers play to their audience, or market, and produce ever bigger vehicles, and then claim that their big vehicle is the baseline for towing and that nothing else will do the job. I'm not knocking that, it sells lots of big trucks and makes a lot of money for a lot of people, including those that build them.

But big vehicles are not much use in Europe. Gas is four times the price than it is in the US, and the roads are, mostly, not suited to big automobiles. You would have a tough time convincing a European that a huge truck with a gas mileage below 20mpg was what they really wanted or needed. So, they make do with what they have; smaller tow vehicles and lighter trailers.

It's frustrating for me when I hear criticism of folks who don't subscribe to the North American big vehicle trend of recent years when they tow their Airstreams. Using something that doesn't fit the perceived view of a good tow vehicle doesn't necessarily make it a bad tow vehicle. I'm happy that people like to buy into the "bigger is better philosophy", but don't denigrate those who don't hold the same views.
Steve; also known as Mr UK Toad

"You can't tow that with that!"
MrUKToad is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Read On GY RV Tires Tsunami-v2 On The Road... 3 04-26-2018 08:03 AM
Interesting Bowlus Read Tsunami-v2 On The Road... 5 09-10-2017 04:57 AM
Interesting read on the Eco-boost Denis4x4 Tow Vehicles 4 08-21-2011 11:58 AM
What that ugly old thing? LOL - Please read and comment RichardT Our Community 92 12-05-2010 06:17 PM

Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.