Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTTinNJ
We went from a 25 to 30 bunk and love the decision. Then again, we aren't 6'6" and often sleep 3 (5 y r old) in the bed under the bunk. Heck, in my mid-40's and I can easily climb and sleep in the bunk. We removed the front bed and turned it into a couch. Also extended the counter space for more storage and food prep area.
|
Scott,
That's incredible man!
Would love to see a few images from the fridge towards the former bedroom. We would need sleeping area, twins, in the bunk. Which I was frustrated AS wouldn't do. But got a call from CS Sunday, believe it or not, and was told of a company in Michigan that might do it.
I'm still not impressed with the bunk (upper bed bunk itself) and short of amputees and anorexics still draw a blank regarding its utility. Hah. You must be a very fit, into yoga, seed eating type of guy.
I'm joking of course. And I've had same frustrations with camp chairs, cars, my Harley, golf clubs, clothes, waders for fly fishing, kayaks, O/U shotguns, etc my whole life. I conceed, I'm the issue.
When my wife and I met she used to laugh when I walked into a wall, passing through a door. Citing how clumsy I was. Until I stood in a doorway and showed her I only had 1" of clearnce on each side. I'm a frigging swan. Clumsy. Hah.
At my size, that upper bunk is offensive. But glad it offers utility to others. One thing we like about this floor plan, one kid could have bottom bunk, one could sleep on side bench. No dinette to break down. This assuming that wife and I had twins. Which would also facilitate me putting a small leather chair with ottoman in entrance to bedroom, between wood walk through.
Twins means open floor there, rather than bottom of queen bed. Wife could have long side bench, I would be in added chair in bedroom entrance, and kids could have entire U dinette, portion of side bench with wife, or a bean bag. Liked the family area options, especially if getting twins. But that bunk, never mind.
Dan