|
03-17-2013, 08:22 PM
|
#1
|
2 Rivet Member
1973 Argosy 22
Shepherdsville
, Kentucky
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
|
TV Antennae
Well I'm back with another question. It's a good thing an old fart like me has a place like this to ask my questions. I have been looking at broadcast antennas and have been drawn to two different ones, the Winegard roadstar 3000 and the Jack digital. If you have any experience with either I'd like to hear about it, pros and cons. Tom
|
|
|
03-17-2013, 08:34 PM
|
#2
|
Rivet Master
2016 25' Flying Cloud
Sunnyvale
, California
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,894
|
Old antennas still work pretty well
While waiting for someone to weigh in on new antennas, wanted to comment that we still have original crank-up and rotating aluminum rod folding antenna, and it works well at picking up UHF signals for our figital TV if we are anywhere near a transmitter antenna... The newer highly directional models bring stations in from greater distance if you know about where transmitter is located, but within 20 or 30 miles most antennas work OK...
__________________
Condoluminum
In Theory, there's no difference between Theory and Practice, but in Practice, there is usually a difference...
|
|
|
03-17-2013, 08:41 PM
|
#3
|
Rivet Master
1964 17' Bambi II
Vintage Kin Owner
Schererville
, Indiana
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,637
|
I put a Jack digital in my Bambi II. Works great from my house....lots of stations. But I haven't had it out of the city, so don't know what will happen out in the boonies! Here's a picture so you can see the size relative to a 17' trailer:
__________________
Becky
1964 Bambi II
1988 Avion 32S
|
|
|
03-17-2013, 08:42 PM
|
#4
|
Rivet Master
1986 31' Sovereign
Miami
, Florida
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,137
|
Your standard issue Winegard bat wing crank up antenna (as noted above) will work just fine. When the USA went digital, a lot of stations moved from VHF to UHF but both signals are line of sight so taller is better.
The only significant difference to the consumer is that it was possible to receive a crappy but watchable signal on analog (the old standard) while a digital signal will either work or it won't there is no medium...
Mike
|
|
|
03-17-2013, 09:08 PM
|
#5
|
Rivet Master
1965 17' Caravel
1983 27' Excella
Walnut Grove/Laguna Woods
, California
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Condoluminum
While waiting for someone to weigh in on new antennas, wanted to comment that we still have original crank-up and rotating aluminum rod folding antenna, and it works well at picking up UHF signals for our figital TV if we are anywhere near a transmitter antenna... The newer highly directional models bring stations in from greater distance if you know about where transmitter is located, but within 20 or 30 miles most antennas work OK...
|
The original folding rod, rotating antenna on our '65 Caravel picks up broadcast digital HD just fine, just like it did with the old analog signal. Replacing it has never crossed my mind.
|
|
|
03-17-2013, 09:43 PM
|
#6
|
Rivet Master
1983 34' Excella
1967 24' Tradewind
Little Rock
, Arkansas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Foster
The original folding rod, rotating antenna on our '65 Caravel picks up broadcast digital HD just fine, just like it did with the old analog signal. Replacing it has never crossed my mind.
|
My Braund Skyliner works great too.
Replacing a working antenna to get HD is the greatest bunch of hokum since buying a special antenna to get color.
If your old antenna is broken or has missing pieces that can't be located, fine, replace it. Otherwise it will work great.
__________________
Vaughan
|
|
|
03-18-2013, 10:11 AM
|
#7
|
2 Rivet Member
1973 Argosy 22
Shepherdsville
, Kentucky
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
|
Using my original antenna isn't an option since it is gone. Becky, it doesn't look bad on your Bambi.
|
|
|
03-18-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#8
|
Rivet Master
1983 34' Excella
1967 24' Tradewind
Little Rock
, Arkansas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,825
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S
Using my original antenna isn't an option since it is gone. Becky, it doesn't look bad on your Bambi.
|
Too bad.
I agree about Becky's. If I were shopping for a new antenna, I think that's what I would get.
__________________
Vaughan
|
|
|
03-18-2013, 01:04 PM
|
#9
|
begorragirl
2017 25' Flying Cloud
Denville
, New Jersey
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,029
|
Newbie following intently. I have tried my TV to no avail. I cranked up the antenna, made sure the green light (booster) was on, turned TV on, and went thru chennel setup. What am i doing wrong? Does the antenna move around? sbb
|
|
|
03-18-2013, 01:18 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator
2017 26' Flying Cloud
Alamo Heights
, Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,534
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sbb
Newbie following intently. I have tried my TV to no avail. I cranked up the antenna, made sure the green light (booster) was on, turned TV on, and went thru chennel setup. What am i doing wrong? Does the antenna move around? sbb
|
Is your television set for the right input? Some TVs have different settings for cable vs. over-the-air signals, some have multiple coax inputs (for antenna and cable or satellite, e.g.)
There's also the possibility that there's an issue with the connection to the antenna or with the coax cable running from there to the wall plate near the TV.
Finally, considering the age of your trailer, there's a small possibility that you have a set that's not digital-capable without a converter.
__________________
— David
Zero Gravitas — 2017 Flying Cloud 26U | WBCCI# 15566
He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. — Sir Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|