Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-19-2013, 04:36 PM   #21
Figment of My Imagination
 
Protagonist's Avatar
 
2012 Interstate Coach
From All Over , More Than Anywhere Else
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,868
This isn't exactly original to Vermont (or is that Varmint?). I believe the first time I heard of it was from the San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Commission, back in July. A study of the concept showed that it could theoretically raise up to $15 million in tax revenues per day in the nine-county SF metro area, based on tax rates varying from 1¢ to 10¢ per mile.

Google "VMT Taxes" for a whole slew of articles. (VMT in this case stands for Vehicle Mileage Tax, not Vermont).
__________________
I thought getting old would take longer!
Protagonist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 05:05 PM   #22
Rivet Master
 
1981 31' Excella II
New Market , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,140
Large Semi Trucks put more wear and tear on roads than cars do. If 90% of stuff was shipped by train the roads would last much longer and accidents would go down. The liberal states are the ones that started this greenie stuff and now they complain because they don't get enough tax from gasoline sales. I would think that putting a GPS in everyones' cars would cost a ton of money and lots of dollars for the people and computers that would make all this work. GPS is not fool proof and niether are computers. It would take all of 5 mins to buy a device that blocks the GPS signal so the car thinks it is not moving. This would be a logistical nightmare.

Perry
perryg114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 05:39 PM   #23
Rivet Master
 
eubank's Avatar

 
Airstream - Other
2016 Interstate Grand Tour Ext
Bosque Farms , New Mexico
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,889
Please keep the political rhetoric in check. The community rules that we all agreed to are linked below:

http://www.airforums.com/forums/misc...ork&page=rules


Lynn
__________________
ACI Big Red Number 21043
eubank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 05:42 PM   #24
Rivet Master
 
byamcaravanner's Avatar
 
1967 28' Ambassador
1963 19' Globetrotter
1970 29' Ambassador
Waukesha , Wisconsin
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by mutcth View Post
Let's put this another way. Should you be taxed for something you don't use? If you use the roads more by driving more miles, perhaps you should pay more towards their upkeep.
But are they going tax only for miles driven within the state? What about us Airstream folks who drive many miles on roads outside of our own state? In my case most of those out of state miles are paid for via tolls.

IMO, the gov't needs to just learn how to spend less... then they won't be running short all the time.
__________________
Steve & the crew
'70 Ambassador International Twin
'63 19' Globetrotter TAC WI-1
https://byamcaravanner.blogspot.com/
byamcaravanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 05:59 PM   #25
Rivet Master
 
rgesch's Avatar
 
1956 26' Cruiser/Overlander
1967 17' Caravel
Newport , New Hampshire
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,058
Images: 18
The Socialist Republic of Vermont. What else would you expect?
__________________
KB1UFH
KB1UFI

"Reality Is The Leading Cause Of Stress"
"There are only five great men in the world and three of them are hamburgers."
rgesch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 08:16 PM   #26
Rivet Master
 
1988 32' Excella
Robbinsville , New Jersey
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,065
It's not that new. I remember seeing it on TV several years ago.

Seems like it still isn't close to happening.
Wazbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 08:25 PM   #27
3 Rivet Member
 
MontyV's Avatar
 
1994 34' Limited
Salem , Oregon
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 208
GPS would not fly under the 4th amendment with our current SCOTUS. I also heard that a couple of years ago Vermont started to tax all planes that flew into the state. Even those that just flew in for a weekend vacation. The immediate fleeing of GA aircraft had such a devastating effect on the business' that make their living providing services on these planes that their efforts and the AOPA lobby got the law reversed. At some point some of these states will have to learn that we as consumers have options.
MontyV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 02:19 PM   #28
Rivet Master
 
1981 31' Excella II
New Market , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,140
Wow taxing the air is a bit extreme. All the new cars have black boxes. I bet there will be new and inventive ways to use those against us.

Perry
perryg114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 02:55 PM   #29
Rivet Master
 
jdalrymple's Avatar
 
2009 27' FB Flying Cloud
1991 35' Airstream 350
Jay , Oklahoma
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,695
I understand that, on the surface, the idea of tracking miles is a revenue replacement scheme that seems to have the added feature of being more equitable.
If one drives more, one pays more regardless of the amount of fuel they burn.
Maybe.
It is my belief that government simply spends too much.
Government can make a one billion dollar project cost three billion faster quicker than the blink of an eye.
How about instead of figuring out a way of collecting revenue lost by more efficient cars, we try to cut spending.
A few fewer street lights, a little less side walk, in the middle of nowhere, that no one will use. All nice items yes, but maybe we can’t, and should not, afford them.
It seems that they government views any lost revenue as monies stolen from them.
Government was never meant to be a business, continually seeking income.
__________________
Jeff & Cindy
'09 27FB Flying Cloud
'91 350 LE MH
jdalrymple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 03:44 PM   #30
3 Rivet Member
 
Airstream Dad's Avatar
 
2005 28' International CCD
Arlington , Virginia
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 164
Images: 1
Virginia did something interesting on the Beltway outside D.C.. The state partnered with a private company to build new tolled (EZpass) HOV/ express lanes. They run next to the regular, free lanes, so paying is by choice only. HOV-3 gets on for free with a special permit.

The interesting part is that the traffic is guaranteed to keep at 55 minimum by dynamically raising the tolls with the volume of traffic. So during rush hour and gridlock, they will keep raising the toll until they deter enough people into the regular lanes, to keep traffic moving.

Many of you might have encountered these lanes already coming up 95 from Richmond and taking the Virginia Beltway around D.C. to I-66, I-270 and so forth. I believe they are extending these to 95 down to Dale City.

I'd think GPS raises too many spooky tracking issues. Easier to just EZPass high volume areas, giving folks a free option.

Airstream Dad
Airstream Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.