|
05-12-2011, 06:39 PM
|
#1
|
4 Rivet Member
1948 22' Liner
1989 34' Limited
long beach
, Mississippi
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 464
|
Axle : upgrade or not ? need Advice
Hi Folks,
after i bought our 59 Overlander , i learned the exact meaning of being framed.
Needles to say.. i am currently building a (almost) new frame.
The main Frame will be out of 2x4"x 3/16" Tubing. I know this is a much heavier gauge, than the original, but i purchase the wrong stuff and now got to live with it...
Here my Question :
Our Overlander has only one factory axle.. even though everything is in a good shape on the axle, i wonder, if i need to upgrade to a heavier one (axle only- springs are perfect) , since i am concerned about the added weight.., or should i add the "optional" second axle? Funds are tight, so i need some realistic advice...
Some additional info:
we plan on re-designing the interior, making it a aft bedroom, with center bath.. but keep the style all original..
let me know what you guys think
thanks
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 06:54 PM
|
#2
|
Always learning
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central
, Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
|
I think you should just take the original axle and springs to be rebuilt by a reputable axle/spring re builder. That will cause you the least headaches in my opinion. Have fun and post some pics!
__________________
Lance
Work is never done, so take time to play!
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 07:34 PM
|
#3
|
Retired.
Currently Looking...
.
, At Large
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,276
|
The only concern I would have would be if the new frame weighs significantly more than the old one. If so, you probably would want a somewhat heavier duty axle and slightly higher capacity springs. If the new material is going to weigh within a hundred or so pounds of the old frame, go with the original axle and springs, unless they are rusty and look like they'll give you trouble.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.
Terry
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 08:17 PM
|
#4
|
4 Rivet Member
1948 22' Liner
1989 34' Limited
long beach
, Mississippi
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 464
|
i would estimate, the new frame to be about 250lbs heavier.. but thats just a guess...what i am replacing is the both main tubing rails from tongue to bumper and three of the cross braces.. also with 3/16" c-channel. those 3 will be in the center above axle..
the axle only has surface rust.. even brakes look good... but they will be replaced..
spring hangers had good rubber and not worn out.. but those will be replaced
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 08:28 PM
|
#5
|
Rivet Master
, Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,721
|
I had good luck upgrading the axle on my '59 Tradewind to a 5200# Dexter drop axle, and adding a leaf to original spring sets. Definitely take the springs to a shop for inspection and a rebuild.
You can't go much over 5200 lbs with regular wheels and tires. If you go with two axles I would switch to torsion style axles. Make sure you have room for the longer wheel wells if you plan to switch to a mid bath.
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 09:33 PM
|
#6
|
Rivet Master
1991 34' Excella
1963 26' Overlander
1961 26' Overlander
Central
, Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,919
|
Cool. Another old Overlander in Mississippi...
The frame on these old ones is really not much of a frame...
Even if your new frame is heaver...(it's not that much of a deal to figure out how much MORE a 3/16 frame weighs)...upgrading the axle won't cost much more...the frame is not a huge % of the final weight
um, don't start adding up all the projected costs...
Just do a bit as you can afford it...
Keep it light and stick with the original single axle design...
|
|
|
05-12-2011, 09:40 PM
|
#7
|
Rivet Master
1981 20' International
Shasta Lake City
, California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,113
|
Rebuild the original stuff and post photos!
|
|
|
05-13-2011, 11:16 AM
|
#8
|
4 Rivet Member
1948 22' Liner
1989 34' Limited
long beach
, Mississippi
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 464
|
ok.. i got it.. i will post pictures
i will probably start a Restoration thread shortly.
I guess this weekend, i have to do some exact calculations on how much weight i am adding.
does anybody know the correct thickness of the steel, that was original used ? .. it is a little hard to measure rust
i like the route of just rebuilding the existing axle, even though i am not happy with the ground clearance on the spring hangers
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 09:38 PM
|
#9
|
Always learning
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central
, Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
|
It is possible to increase the ride height of the trailer through the use of spacers or moving the axle tube from above to below the springs. I guess you gave up on a torsion axle conversion.
__________________
Lance
Work is never done, so take time to play!
|
|
|
05-19-2011, 02:42 AM
|
#10
|
Restorations done right
Commercial Member
1962 26' Overlander
1961 26' Overlander
Vintage Kin Owner
Currently Looking...
Baltimore
, Maryland
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,545
|
I reason early Airstreams are so cool is because they are low riders. Jacking them up does nothing but ruin the aesthetic in my opinion. Leaf spring axles work well if you keep the rubber fresh and the shocks changed regularlly. Just like on a car or truck.
My bigger concern is this beefing of the frame. I see this done all the time, and I always cringe when I do. The reason an Airstream frame is so light is because it is designed to, desired to, and expected to flex as the trailer goes down the road. The manly instinct is to "beef it up" and when one does, the engineering of the structure is changed. The frame does not need to be extra strong, neither does the floor, skin, or belly. Together all those things are strong.
I will now step off the soap box...
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|