Quote:
I don't know if that is why they count you as commercial
|
Eric, just take the time to read the post by Melvin P. Thorpe:
Quote:
Yes, it is a commercial vehicle but it is probably rated for personal use not commercial use
If you were using the truck to haul goods for others.....it would be rated differently [commercial] causing the premium to rise
|
All MDT are considered commercial trucks as far as the insurance companies are concerned.
If we "were using the truck to haul goods for others" we would have a commercial policy. The policy would change but the truck would still be rated the same.
Any more questions?
A.E. Milliman:
As far as I know, some States who have big cities have problems with uninsured drivers (it's the case with PA because of Philadelphia, and New Jersey). They are taking more risks when writing policies in those States. They end up having to pay claims when an uninsured driver is involved. So, to cover their losses, they nail everybody in that State. Cities of course are more expensive , but everybody ends up paying more. I would guess that in States like South Dakota, Wyoming, they don't have the same problem.
What happened in Phila: they had more drivers without insurance than with. So the rates were going up. So less people were insured. So....
I think the State had to step in to try to stop this vicious cycle.
Other big cities may not have been sitting on their ass for so long, and put their foot down before it was too late.
So, in the end, it's still a problem of location. Just not as direct.
All of this is of course pure speculation on my part. But, it seems logical, no?