Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-14-2016, 05:32 PM   #1
2 Rivet Member
 
clamb's Avatar
 
2002 25' Classic
Portland , Oregon
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 79
Images: 15
Tandem axle- where exactly is the tongue weight pivot point?

I have been working with a member of the F150 forum to arrive at a spreadsheet that will result in theoretical axle weights using a WDH, based on all the usual suspects...tongue weight, cargo weight (not JUST cargo weight, but exactly where, and how much). The spreadsheet is based mainly on the information developed by Ron Gratz, which addresses forces and fulcrums, ball- to axle distances, etc.

This spreadsheet will allow entry of specific weights at specific locations to arrive at the axle weights, and compare to axle ratings to determine a safe setup. When it is finalized, I will post a link to it here, or at least in a new thread. You should even be able to determine approx. how much tension is required on your WDH bars. Good stuff!

My reason for this thread is, in doing the preliminary trial to prove the values generated by the spreadsheet, I used the distance from the ball coupler to the midpoint of the trailer axles as the "ball to axle distance", and I couldn't get the spreadsheet to agree with actual CAT scale (hitched) axle weights, but when I shifted toward the front axle, it improved, and when I used the actual distance from front axle to ball coupler, everything fell into place pretty well.

I did an experiment- I measured the height of the rub strip on the side of the trailer, centered at the front axle. I then jacked the tongue up a ways, and down. The measurement didn't change. All tire pressures were equal, BTW.

So, I am thinking that this is the correct pivot point to use, but I do realize that the pivot point does change somewhat, constantly in flux, if you will. Braking and accelerating alone will change tongue weight.

I would greatly appreciate any thoughts from Y'all!
__________________

__________________
clamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 06:45 PM   #2
Rivet Master
 
Lumatic's Avatar

 
1971 25' Tradewind
1993 34' Excella
Currently Looking...
Estancia , New Mexico
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,642
Images: 16
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by clamb View Post

I would greatly appreciate any thoughts from Y'all!
TMI
__________________

__________________
Sail on silver girl. Sail on by. Your time has come to shine.
Lumatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 06:48 PM   #3
3 Rivet Member
 
2015 23' International
Charleston , South Carolina
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 162
The front axle sounds right. That's the pivot.
__________________
FollySteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 06:51 PM   #4
3 Rivet Member
 
2015 23' International
Charleston , South Carolina
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 162
I don't think it changes either, even when braking. The change is because of linear forces causing moments forces on the pivot.
__________________
FollySteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 07:04 PM   #5
2 Rivet Member
 
clamb's Avatar
 
2002 25' Classic
Portland , Oregon
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 79
Images: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumatic View Post
TMI
No comprenday
__________________
clamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 08:10 PM   #6
3 Rivet Member
 
WaLee's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Nevada City , California
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 207
Why? Just load up prudently and go camping!


Sent from my iPad using Airstream Forums
__________________
WaLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 08:34 PM   #7
2 Rivet Member
 
clamb's Avatar
 
2002 25' Classic
Portland , Oregon
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 79
Images: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaLee View Post
Why? Just load up prudently and go camping!


Sent from my iPad using Airstream Forums
Because in my particular case, I am near the limits of my TV, and I wish to know exactly what is going on so I can SAFELY load up prudently and go camping. I simply do not subscribe to the hitch manufacturer's statement that 1/3 of the tongue weight goes here, 1/3 goes there, because in the end, if there is an accident resulting in damage, injury or God forbid, death, I (or you) may need to face a court of law where it could be proven that X axle was overloaded.
__________________
clamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2016, 08:35 PM   #8
4 Rivet Member
 
GammaDog's Avatar
 
2014 25' FB Eddie Bauer
Vero Beach , Florida
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 353
Images: 26
Interesting question! There must be an engineer out there who knows the real answer. I did a couple of thought experiments and concluded that the answer might be "it depends".

I believe that if the trailer is precisely level (defined as: equal load on each axle) then the pivot would be the mid point between the axles.

However, if the center of mass is shifted forward, the pivot point would also shift forward. Conversely, if the center of mass shifted toward the rear then the pivot point would also shift.

I've never attempted to measure the loads on each axle of my trailer separately. Maybe others have. It seems to me that if the trailer was level (as measured by a carpentry tool) that the loads would be similar. However, if weight was added in the front of the trailer and the WD was not reset then the hitch would drop, the trailer would no longer be level, tongue weight would increase, the load on the front trailer axle would increase more than the rear and the implied pivot point would be the front trailer axle. If that same load was placed behind the rear axle then the hitch would rise, etc, etc and the rear axle would look like the pivot.

The transition from front to back pivot would be when the trailer was level.

To your point, it may be that many of us run slightly nose-low and front axle heavy. That would absolutely happen if you set the hitch ball to the level height of the detached trailer then hook the trailer up and have a few inches of sink to the rear end of the TV. That condition would precisely lead to your measured observation.

I have completely convinced myself through thought alone that the above must be true... Prior experience with this feeling of confidence tells me I am likely to be informed otherwise by someone whose learning and experience is stronger than thoughts alone. So... come on engineers and physicists... What's the real answer?
__________________
GammaDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 07:17 AM   #9
Vintage Kin
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,585
Images: 1
The only limits that matter are axle and tire rating. The rest is eyewash.

A spreadsheet won't tell anyone how good is the hitch lashup, much less the attributes of handling and braking.

The focus on "weight" as a go/no-go determinant is misplaced. Unrealistic.

I constantly see rigs out on the road that probably are fine insofar as that is concerned. But even a glance at the attitude of the rig says that real problems exist. Not addressed. Or that the heavier tow vehicle itself doesn't pose an additional risk. It does.

Playing with weight capacity numbers is a start. It sure as hell doesn't determine safety. It can work directly against that.
__________________
1990 35' Silver Streak Sterling; 9k GVWR.
2004 DODGE Cummins 305/555; 6-manual; 9k GVWR.
Hensley Arrow. 9-cpm solo, 15-cpm towing
Sold: Silver Streak Model 3411
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 07:21 AM   #10
Vintage Kin
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,585
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by clamb View Post
Because in my particular case, I am near the limits of my TV, and I wish to know exactly what is going on so I can SAFELY load up prudently and go camping. I simply do not subscribe to the hitch manufacturer's statement that 1/3 of the tongue weight goes here, 1/3 goes there, because in the end, if there is an accident resulting in damage, injury or God forbid, death, I (or you) may need to face a court of law where it could be proven that X axle was overloaded.

Show us that court case.
__________________
1990 35' Silver Streak Sterling; 9k GVWR.
2004 DODGE Cummins 305/555; 6-manual; 9k GVWR.
Hensley Arrow. 9-cpm solo, 15-cpm towing
Sold: Silver Streak Model 3411
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 08:49 AM   #11
Rivet Master
 
dznf0g's Avatar

 
2007 30' Classic
Oswego , Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,401
Images: 5
I'm confused....is OP talking about Center of Gravity or pivot point. They are two very different things.
__________________
-Rich-

"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." - Red Green
dznf0g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 08:54 AM   #12
Rivet Master
 
TG Twinkie's Avatar
 
1974 Argosy 26
Morrill , Nebraska
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,139
Images: 2
Blog Entries: 5
Clamb;
You have way too much time on your hands. IMHO
In almost all trailer design the distance from the axles to the hitch is greater than the distance from the axles to the rear bumper. Because of this the pivot point (fulcrum)
will always be on or near the front axle. IMHO
I'm going fishing now.
__________________
Knowledge: "A gift to be shared. A treasure to receive."
TG Twinkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 09:07 AM   #13
Rivet Master
 
1988 25' Excella
1987 32' Excella
Knoxville , Tennessee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,163
Blog Entries: 1
It seems to me the pivot point to use for the calculations would be the front axle. If you tip the trailer down from level it will pivot on the front and the rear axle will eventually come off the ground. If you raise the trailer enough at the front end it will eventually pivot on the rear axle and raise the front axle off the ground.
So to me, I would think the front axle pivot point would yield the best results for what you want to do.

If you get in a wreck with a "marginal" TV I doubt if you will ever want to show your spreadsheet.
__________________
Bill M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2016, 09:07 AM   #14
1987 Avion 34W owner
 
PaulnGina's Avatar
 
Vintage Kin Owner
Good Ol' , USA
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,889
That made my brain hurt.....

Get a tow vehicle with more capacity than you need and spend all that spreadsheet time going places and doing things!


PaulnGina
1987 Avion 34W
1995 Ford F250 7.3L PowerStroke

"I don't mean to sound degrading but with a face like that you got nothing to laugh about"
__________________

__________________
"Long lay the world in sin and error pining
Till He appeared and the soul felt its worth"
1987 Avion 34W
1995 Ford F250 7.3L PowerStroke
PaulnGina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tow vehicle Tongue Weight vs. Trailer Tongue Weight KeepPedaling Hitches, Couplers & Balls 10 03-23-2016 01:33 PM
Pivot Point Projection handling in marginal conditions Gsmblue Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches 30 08-23-2015 07:57 AM
Driver seat does not pivot 180 dateem Land Yacht/Legacy Motorhomes 11 11-12-2014 03:32 PM
Single vs. Tandem and Smallest tandem axle JimGolden Airstream Trailer Forums 27 11-29-2009 10:04 PM
Wiper Motor Pivot Shaft realpank Argosy Motorhomes 3 08-05-2008 07:35 AM


Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.