Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-23-2007, 05:24 PM   #1
4 Rivet Member
 
walter1's Avatar
 
1964 22' Safari
Foresthill , California
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 257
Towing: Tundra vs Sequoia vs Land Cruiser


I’ve read you guys love your Tundras. I have need for an enclosed midsized 4x4 SUV for double duty with “other interests”.

Has anyone towed with a 2000+ Toyota Sequoia or Land Cruiser? Towing #3500-#4500 1960’s 22’ Safari.

Are Sequoia and/or Land Cruiser built on same chassis/power train as Tundras?
__________________

__________________
walter1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 05:47 PM   #2
2 Rivet Member
 
apolaroid's Avatar
 
1959 22' Flying Cloud
1972 25' Tradewind
1962 30' Sovereign
Navarre , Florida
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 74
I have towed with my 97 Staight six 4.5 Land Cruiser. My 22 foot Flying Could pulls with no problem, We also pulled the Tradewind, although a heavier pull still worked, but I would not push that a lot because its much heavier. I think any of the Toyotas you mentioned will do fine for your needs. My Land Cruiser is the best auto I have ever owned. Its a solid product, and very comfortable.
__________________

__________________
Watch your thoughts, they become your words.
Watch your words, they become your actions.
Watch your actions, they become your habits.
Watch your habits, they become your character.
Watch your character, it becomes your destiny.
apolaroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 06:07 PM   #3
Rivet Master<br><img src="/ugala/forums/images/5rivet.gif">
 
CanoeStream's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,279
Images: 19
Blog Entries: 3
Hi Walter1 -- Hey, it's me again!

The Sequoia is built on the same chassis as a Tundra. I can't say what has happened to Sequoias with the larger size Tundras coming out of the San Antonio plant. A general rule of thumb is that an SUV version of a pickup will have more body weight than a basic pickup box. Payload (aka load capacity) are correspondingly reduced. You shouldn't have any problem with a vintage 22-footer with either the Sequoia or Tundra -- either the new or old versions.

I don't have time to look at Land Cruiser specs right now. Maybe others will speak up.
__________________
Bob

5 meter Langford Nahanni

CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 06:19 PM   #4
Rivet Master<br><img src="/ugala/forums/images/5rivet.gif">
 
CanoeStream's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,279
Images: 19
Blog Entries: 3
Qualifying statement -- I'm not talking about any 6-cylinder engines when I give the blanket statement above.

The 1st generation Tundra platform may run into limits faster than other 1/2-ton trucks -- a cautionary note for those contemplating larger or newer (heavier) Airstreams. Each case should be discussed separately.
__________________
Bob

5 meter Langford Nahanni

CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 06:40 PM   #5
Shop Teacher
 
mike rogers's Avatar
 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
tigard , Oregon
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 75
pull with a tacoma

I pull a 2006 25' safari with a a '05 tacoma. We have gone over many big mountains and a lot of distance. Never any problem with power. you could also consider a fj cruiser or a 4runner to to what you have. My Dad had a '98 suburban for his 25 foot caravaneer and tried my Tacoma and traded. It had more power! Check it out!!!
__________________
mike rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 08:33 AM   #6
Rivet Master<br><img src="/ugala/forums/images/5rivet.gif">
 
CanoeStream's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,279
Images: 19
Blog Entries: 3
Not enough TV?

Quote:
I pull a 2006 25' safari with a a '05 tacoma. We have gone over many big mountains and a lot of distance. Never any problem with power.
Pulls like it's not even back there? Your drivetrain might be pulling the load. A widebody 25' Safari is a heavy beast (>5000# empty weight). The Tacoma specs say the max GCWR is 7500# for a 2WD and 8000# for a 4WD without the tow package. Does your manual say anything better for GCWR the way you are equipped?

Usual recommendations are that a trailer and its tongue weight should not exceed 80-85% of any of the following: tow vehicle payload, tow capacity or GCWR.
Quote:
you could also consider a fj cruiser or a 4runner to to what you have.
The FJ Cruiser has a very short wheelbase -- not a great tow vehicle!
__________________
Bob

5 meter Langford Nahanni

CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 04:13 PM   #7
3 Rivet Member
 
2001 19' Bambi
Ashland , Oregon
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 106
We're looking into getting a Toyota Four Runner to go with an '07 19' Bambi. The V-6 has less towing capacity than the V-8 but the around-town gas mileage wouldn't be good with the V-8. Any suggestions, oh wise ones? :=D
__________________
Muddy Waters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 06:20 PM   #8
3 Rivet Member
 
1973 25' Tradewind
waynesboro , Virginia
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 102
Blog Entries: 1
I tow a 73 25' with a 2000 Tacoma, manual transmission. It does a great job, also use the Reese Dual CAm...get lots of comments that it is too much trailer for the truck, but that is a personal issue....
__________________
waltero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 08:27 PM   #9
Rivet Master
 
Gene's Avatar
 
2008 25' Safari FB SE
Grand Junction , Colorado
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,840
Sequoias up to 2007 are on the original Tundra chassis. I think the 2008 will be on the new Tundra (2007 and onward) chassis. The Sequoia is plush and way overpriced. The Tundra Limited is also plush, the Crew Cab is big, the Double Cab almost as big, and with a hard tonneau has probably the cubic feet of cargo space as the Sequoia for a lot less money. The Sequoias are at lot heavier than the Tundras were—1,500 lbs or so I think, so subtract that from towing ability. LandCruisers look like stretched 4Runner for 50% or more money, but they may be lighter than the Sequoia and have the same engine.
__________________
Gene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 10:59 PM   #10
4 Rivet Member
 
walter1's Avatar
 
1964 22' Safari
Foresthill , California
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 257
Thanks for the help.

Are Sequoias pretty much the same body 2000-2007?
Some look "fatter" on the road...could be optical illusion.
__________________
walter1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2007, 12:36 AM   #11
Rivet Master
 
urbanfood's Avatar
 
1956 22' Flying Cloud
Venice , California
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltero
I tow a 73 25' with a 2000 Tacoma, manual transmission. It does a great job, also use the Reese Dual CAm...get lots of comments that it is too much trailer for the truck, but that is a personal issue....
it's not a personal issue, it's a fact. that is way too much trailer for the truck and that tow combination is downright dangerous not just for you, but the people around you when traveling on the road .
__________________
david

*by asking the above question,
i verify that i have already used
the search feature to the best of my ability...
urbanfood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2007, 06:13 AM   #12
4 Rivet Member
 
muddy_hollow's Avatar
 
1965 20' Globetrotter
1956 22' Caravanner
Mendon , Massachusetts
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to muddy_hollow Send a message via Yahoo to muddy_hollow
Tundra, Sequoia, Land Rover...

The first question I ask myself is how did I end up with three petrol burners, when I try to keep my house oil usage low...... folks with airstreams have a hard time claiming green Either way, I have all three set-up for towing our 65' globetrotter and 56' caravanner. The Tundra has been the workhorse and I've been happy towing with it, but we recently added the sequoia and it tows so much nicer than the Tundra. Between model years, Toyota did some incremental improvements on the suspension and engine. Both tow very well, but I personally like the SUV for camping versus the truck. More room for kid, dog, and other items.

The rover has been fun to tow with but the shorter wheel base and full time four wheel drive make the ride less comfortable and eats more gas. The truck is made for rough use and we regularly see them towing horse trailers and boats, so the capacity is there for small to medium sized rigs. I would not tow a 25' trailer with it. I've heard tail waging the dog used, which I would suspect could happen with the rover and longer trailer combo.

The older land cruisers did not share the same platform as the Tundra and Sequoia, but I recall reading that the new ones do. The overall length, width, and height of the older models seem to be inline with the Land Rover, maybe a bit bigger but not much. The engine in the rover is bigger than all of them, but the full time four wheel drive takes to much power way.

My opinion is skip the Land Cruiser. The older ones are not appropriate for trailering over the long haul. The 2000-2006 model Tundra and Sequia are good, but again not for bigger than 25' foot trailers, unless you are going for a new version with the 5.7L engine.

Personally, I am waiting for Toyota to come out with a diesel and then I'll flip my Tundra over for a new one.

HTH,

Doug
__________________
56' Caravanner 'The Broomstick'

muddy_hollow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 11:48 AM   #13
2 Rivet Member
 
musketeer's Avatar
 
1989 25' Excella
1998 36' Land Yacht Widebody
Kimball , Minnesota
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 71
Land Cruiser

I tow a 1989 25' Excella with a 1998 Land Cruiser. The Land Cruiser is not built on a Tundra platform, it has its own platform shared with the Lexus LS470 and is still built in Japan. It is built primarily for "off road" but also is quiet and smooth.

My opinion is that it isn't an ideal tow vechicle because of the short wheelbase and the limited gross weight/tow weight capabilities. It does however pull very well. The engine only displaces 4.7 liters but has relatively high torque, is very smooth at higher RPMs and has 4.33 rear end gearing. The towing disadvantage of the short wheelbase turns into an advantage when manuervering in close quarters. Also, nothing breaks. The only "repair" I have made in 120,000 miles is a broken key fob.
__________________
musketeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 09:11 PM   #14
3 Rivet Member
 
hshovic's Avatar
 
2007 25' Safari FB SE
Bozeman , Montana
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 222
Images: 20
We had a long discussion on TV's capacities.

Try running some numbers... It sobered me right up.

http://www.airforums.com/forums/f463...tml#post456088

"Running on the edge can be cutting".
__________________

__________________
Hank
WBCCI 1489 AIR 20708
2015 Chevy 3/4 ton 4 x 4 gas; 2007 Safari FB SE
"Its better to light just one candle than to curse the darkness,
Unless you're blinded by the light..."
hshovic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toyota Sequoia Towing an Airstream SE 23'? leetimes Tow Vehicles 16 09-03-2007 01:32 PM
TV...2004 Land Cruiser???? TomR Tow Vehicles 12 08-31-2006 12:08 PM
'03/'04 Land Cruiser and 22'CCD Xray Tow Vehicles 7 02-25-2004 07:50 AM
towing with new toyota land cruiser malvica Tow Vehicles 1 09-29-2003 02:17 PM
Towing with a Tundra JimC Tow Vehicles 37 08-03-2003 10:00 PM


Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.