Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-28-2014, 12:00 PM   #1
4 Rivet Member
 
2011 30' Flying Cloud
Arvada , Colorado
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Tow vehicle fuel question

We haul our latest 30' Flying Cloud with a 2008 2500 Suburban with the 6.0 liter engine. While we definitely notice the additional GW of 1,500 lbs over our earlier International our desire to move to a 2500 diesel pickup is not in the cards at the moment.

So, in traveling out west last summer/fall we experienced a very slow go in a couple of steep elevation climbs. We are talking about 1st gear at 3,000 rpms. We also found that in many remote locations only 85 octane fuel was available. The recommended octane for Suburban is 87. But, sometimes 89 octane would be available as well.

At an oil change stop I asked the Chevy dealer about that and they said that in that particular vehicle they recommend the 85 as long as we did not experience pre-ignition which we did not.

Upon getting home, a knowledgeable friend thought that we ought to burn high test in those situations since given the altitude and fuel we probably were losing 20% of our horsepower.

I don't mind spending the money on higher octane fuel if it will make a difference and does not create some other problem. Thoughts? Thanks, Jack
Jack46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 01:24 PM   #2
2020 Classic 33
 
Box Elder , South Dakota
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,731
Images: 1
Jack the rule of thumb is that you loose about 3% of horsepower per thousand feet of elevation. Higher octane will help some. But I think the 6.0L is 335hp so at 6,000 feet it only has 274hp left to help you up the hills.
__________________
Gary
2020 Classic 33 Twin, 2019 Ram 3500 Longhorn, ProPride
NØVPN
ghaynes755 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 01:34 PM   #3
jcl
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Vancouver , British Columbia
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,591
If the fuel you are using has a sufficient anti knock index/octane rating so that the engine controller doesn't retard the timing, you will gain nothing by using a higher octane rating. You should at least try and use 87 IMO.


At higher elevations the octane rating doesn't matter as much (about 2 points is the spread) so some areas use 85 as regular instead of 87. This won't cause engine damage or reduced power in and of itself.


The next point is that what it says on the pump isn't necessarily what you are getting. If you are in a rural area where they pump less volume, the fuel may not be as fresh, so the octane rating may be down from what it should be. Look for higher volume stations.


Then there is ethanol percent. You may notice a difference with increased ethanol, and it is also not always what it always says on the pump (often 5% or 10%), since it is mixed in at the bulk plant. If it is higher, that can make a difference.


You mention steep grades. At higher elevations your engine will produce less power, and you may notice this as well, separate from any fuel issues.


You can try a tank of 89 and see if it makes any difference to apparent power and fuel efficiency. If so, use it. It won't hurt anything. But if it doesn't help either power or mileage, indicating that it is preventing the engine controller from retarding the timing, it isn't providing any benefit, just draining your wallet faster.


Jeff
jcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 01:52 PM   #4
4 Rivet Member
 
2011 30' Flying Cloud
Arvada , Colorado
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 411
Gary and Jeff. I very much appreciate your feedback. Thanks! Jsck
Jack46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 02:01 PM   #5
cwf
Rivet Master
 
cwf's Avatar
 
1999 34' Excella
Currently Looking...
Hillsboro , Texas
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,408
Images: 2
Blog Entries: 2
If you know someone who can try a test tow using a diesel of comparable size to your gasoline motor and side by side compare that would be an appropriate "test".

I would have my truck "dynoed".. So you "know" what power you have available.

Our Duramax Diesel 2500 just chugs along.... It is, for me, the right tool for the task. I get 23mpg running light on the interstate unless I get on the Troll Road where the limit is 85mph... That speed gets 16-18mpg.

When under tow, I get 11-13 mpg. Mileage, is speed and terrain dependent. I was getting better mileage but something changed with the diesel supply around here.

I am paying the same fuel costs as when I had a 6.0 Chevy gas motor when driving in town...and hands down better road mpg in the diesel.
__________________
Peace and Blessings..
Channing
WBCCI# 30676
cwf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 08:08 AM   #6
Rivet Master
 
Silver Otter's Avatar

 
2011 31' Classic
Nellysford , Virginia
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,067
Images: 8
Blog Entries: 1
Ditto cwf Channing.
__________________
Greg Heuer, Spirit of Virginia Airstream Club
2011 31' Classic Ltd. - The Silver Otter III
2013 GMC Denali 2500HD 6.6 DuraMax - Sierra Blanca
TAC VA-18 | Life Mbr ACI 1927 - Spirit of Virginia Club | AIR 53869
Silver Otter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 08:51 AM   #7
Rivet Master
 
87MH's Avatar
 
1978 31' Sovereign
Texas Airstream Harbor , Zavalla, in the Deep East Texas Piney Woods on Lake Sam Rayburn
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,435
Images: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwf View Post
If you know someone who can try a test tow using a diesel of comparable size to your gasoline motor and side by side compare that would be an appropriate "test".

I would have my truck "dynoed".. So you "know" what power you have available.

Not quite a fair comparison....most all modern diesel engines are turbo charged, maintaining base line power to very high relative altitudes. As pointed out earlier in this thread gassers start with a rating at sea level and lose power with altitude as you get farther from the coastline.
__________________
Dennis

"Suck it up, spend the bucks, do it right the first time."

WBCCI # 1113
AirForums #1737

Trailer '78 31' Sovereign

Living Large at an Airstream Park on the Largest Lake Totally Contained in Texas
Texas Airstream Harbor, Inc.
87MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 09:24 AM   #8
Rivet Master
 
dkottum's Avatar
 
2012 25' Flying Cloud
Battle Lake , Minnesota
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,714
It costs more to buy and run the big diesel pickups no matter how you slice it. Ram offers a small diesel now that matches many Airstream towing needs well. So many SUV's. But you will pay for that low rpm torque as well.

But what's the difference, the op has a gas engine, plans to keep it. He's asking about gasoline, which is what we are traveling through Idaho and Montana with today. Our rig is lighter and moving along nicely, but gasoline questions are more interesting without diesel answers.
__________________
Doug and Cheryl
2012 FC RB, Michelin 16, ProPride 1400
2016 Ram 1500 Laramie Crew Cab 4X4 Ecodiesel 3.92 axles

The Truth is More Important Than the Facts
dkottum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 09:34 AM   #9
Wise Elder
 
Jammer's Avatar
 
2010 30' Classic
Vintage Kin Owner
South of the river , Minnesota
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,169
Hello Jack

In mountainous regions, somewhat lower-octane gas has been sold for years if not decades.

Gasoline engines at wide open throttle, unless turbocharged, will have a smaller fuel-air charge (less mass) in the cylinder at higher altitudes. This leads to the loss of power compared to sea level. It also reduces detonation. Therefore, at altitude, a lower octane fuel works just as well.

Fuels sold with 1-2 points lower octane than is customary at sea level reflect this reality.

The only time there's a problem is when you purchase low octane fuel at altitude and then drive out of the mountains.
__________________
To learn to see below the surface, you must adjust your altitude
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 10:22 AM   #10
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Currently Looking...
Currently Looking...
2022 Atlas
Homosassa , Florida
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 729
I just purchased a 2500 Silverado Diesel and I've towed with it once. All I can say is that it does have the wow factor and my wife loves driving it because it never says I think I can, it says I know I can. And the mileage is about 1/3 better than the 5.3 gasser I had.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Airstream Forums mobile app
Tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 10:48 AM   #11
3 Rivet Member
 
genearnold's Avatar
 
1992 34' Limited
Grand Island , Nebraska
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 248
Having had four gassers and two diesels during my camping/towing years I can comment from both camps. My twelve years with my '96 Dodge Cummins was stellar. However, with today's truck prices and diesel fuel prices I doubt I'd go that way if I was starting anew. You do not mention your gear ratio in your Suburban. This is of major importance. If it is less than 3.73 you'll be in for some slow climbing. Having said this, unless you tow a lot in mountains with steep climbs at high elevations, don't sweat it if you like what you have. If you're on a four lane just climb slowly & enjoy the journey. If you're on a two-lane, pull over when you can to let faster traffic go around, and enjoy the journey anyhow!
__________________
'92 Limited 34ft (now sold); '96 Dodge Cummins 4X2, 5speed
genearnold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 12:09 PM   #12
Rivet Master
 
Gregsch's Avatar
 
1979 24' Airstream Excella 24
Tipp City , Ohio
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 551
This may or may not apply to your towing a trailer but , I will share it for what its worth. I have a supercharged Bonneville. GM specifies 91 octane. Around here the choices are 93, 89, 87. I generally run the 93 and it runs great! Occasionally I get in a situation where the lower octane is all that's available. 89 seems to run fine, even the 87, until you mash the throttle on an entrance ramp and it seems to have less power. I never have pre-ignition ping, the computer senses pre-ignition and retards the spark thus limiting the power output. I have done several mileage checks and without exception i get better gas mileage with the higher octane. If I were you I would try running higher octane when towing and see if it makes an improvement. In the old days, I towed my Overlander with a 1988 ford 351, it had duel tanks and I would fill one with premium and one with regular. It would ping very noticeably when towing on regular fuel but, when running premium it would not ping and would pull much stronger.
Gregsch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 12:17 PM   #13
Rivet Master
 
1981 31' Excella II
New Market , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,145
3000 RPM is not going to allow that engine to produce much horsepower. Ask the dealer what a safe redline is for that engine and what the RPM is for peak HP. If you are climbing hills you need to stay at the peak HP to get up that hill. A diesel will be able to pull a hill at 3000 RPM but a gasser won't develop enough HP. It is ok to run a gas engine at high RPM. That is what they are designed for.

Perry
perryg114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 01:16 PM   #14
Rivet Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack46 View Post
We haul our latest 30' Flying Cloud with a 2008 2500 Suburban with the 6.0 liter engine. While we definitely notice the additional GW of 1,500 lbs over our earlier International our desire to move to a 2500 diesel pickup is not in the cards at the moment.

So, in traveling out west last summer/fall we experienced a very slow go in a couple of steep elevation climbs. We are talking about 1st gear at 3,000 rpms. We also found that in many remote locations only 85 octane fuel was available. The recommended octane for Suburban is 87. But, sometimes 89 octane would be available as well.

At an oil change stop I asked the Chevy dealer about that and they said that in that particular vehicle they recommend the 85 as long as we did not experience pre-ignition which we did not.

Upon getting home, a knowledgeable friend thought that we ought to burn high test in those situations since given the altitude and fuel we probably were losing 20% of our horsepower.

I don't mind spending the money on higher octane fuel if it will make a difference and does not create some other problem. Thoughts? Thanks, Jack




I live in Colorado and go over lots of high passes towing my Airstream. The best fuel mileage is obtained by driving in the highest gear possible.
I go up the hill with no more than 3/4th throttle and let the transmission downshift when it is ready. Your vehicle will drop below the speed limit. If you hammer it in low gear trying to keep up with traffic, your mileage will suffer.
I agree with the other posters, unless your engine is detonating you will gain nothing with higher octane fuel at high altitude.
handn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 01:56 PM   #15
Rivet Master
 
ROBERTSUNRUS's Avatar

 
2005 25' Safari
Salem , Oregon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,376
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 55
Hi, newer vehicles are computer tuned to run whatever octane the manufacture recommends. Going up or down from the recommended octane can/will cause less power and mileage. In the old days we would advance the ignition timing and run the highest octane gas for more power and better mileage. [we did this when we planned to take our cars to Lion's Drag Strip] My Lincoln runs Premium (92) and on our Alaska trip some gas stations only had Diesel and 87 octane gas. In that case you have to burn what's available.
__________________
Bob 2005 Safari 25-B
"Le Petit Chateau Argent" Small Silver Castle
2000 Navigator / 2014 F-150 Eco-Boost / Equal-i-zer / P-3
YAMAHA 2400 / AIR #12144
ROBERTSUNRUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 02:19 PM   #16
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Mantua , Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,062
Blog Entries: 2
Try to find out where your max hp and torque are developed and run near that rpm or above. As someone suggested, ask the dealer for a save max rpm, or do an internet search. Higher rpm Ina gasser is necessary for max performance. Only a diesel runs at lower rpm for max performance. Rev it up. Jim
xrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 03:18 PM   #17
Rivet Master
 
1981 31' Excella II
New Market , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,145
There are some circumstances where running higher octane will help. Yes the computer will take care of engine knock most of the time buy retarding the timing. This reduces peak HP. If I were running in the mountains, I would tend to run higher octane. Yes it is true you may not need it because the lower air pressure reduces compression which reduces knock. My Excursion will tend to ping a little with 87 octane at full throttle. It would run better on 89 Octane. 93 would be a waste of money.

Perry
perryg114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 04:07 PM   #18
'06 75th Winick Prototype
 
2006 19' International CCD
1968 22' Safari
The Swamps of Hell , Lousy-Anna
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 228
One thing that is bad regarding GM engine power management is that it will reduce engine timing whenever needed, but it will NOT advance it back immediately. The GM system "learns" patterns over time and adjusts several things to your habits, fuel quality, temperature, and driving conditions. What that means is say you usually run 93 octane for maximum power, then fill it up with 85 octane. At least on the SSR (6.0 LS2), timing will be drastically retarded for the less octane fuel. However, once you use all the low octane fuel and refill completely with 93, the computer will NOT immediately advance the timing back, so you are at a huge power disadvantage. At least GM on the SSR provides a fuse (number 21) to pull just for this purpose, to "reset" any de-tuning back to the original state (whether it be the factory GM tune or an installed performance tune). On the SSR, I've mounted a momentary switch on the dash so that when I'm out west and can't find good gas (sometimes 90 is all you can find...what's with this blasphemy??!?!), once I refill with at LEAST 91 (a Godsend to find out west, 93 is a pipe dream) then I reset the computer to get rid of any detuning the computer did for the poorer quality gas. The difference is amazingly noticeable. The SSR has a torque meter on the floor that will peg 400+ with adequate octane fuel; out west with 90 octane I'm lucky to hit 275. Once I reset the computer and fill up with adequate octane, the torque meter pegs right back at 400+. I reset the computer frequently just to let the engine adjust whenever I know I've purged out any questionable fuel in the system. Remember, the computer will only DETUNE and reduce timing for any problems (bad gas, altitude, excessive heat, etc) but it will NOT advance the timing back quickly...it takes several hundred miles to do that. That's why the computer must be reset.

I'm sure the Suburbans have a similar system...if GM didn't provide a fuse to pull to reset the computer, then it is imperative to reset the computer when out west by disconnecting the battery for a few minutes to allow the computer's power management system to optimize engine performance for the conditions you are immediately in without having to wait hundreds of miles for increased performance to return. Disconnecting the battery accomplishes the same thing that removing the fuse on the SSR does; it resets the computer and retunes the engine for the current conditions. Try it. This works.
ggoat!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2014, 11:12 PM   #19
Rivet Master
 
dkottum's Avatar
 
2012 25' Flying Cloud
Battle Lake , Minnesota
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,714
After reading this thread this morning before traveling through Idaho and Montana on many steep grades, I tried a tank of 89 and a tank of 85 octane in our 2012 Ram 5.7 pulling the our 25' Flying Cloud. Elevations ran about 4000 to 7000 feet.

We're not nearly as heavy as the o.p. but I could not notice any difference using the two different fuels. It pulled the grades with ease keeping the rpm in the 2500 to 3500 range and downshifting as needed. Surprising to me because I thought the engine would retard the timing enough with lower octane to be quite noticeable.

There should be a table somewhere on the internet showing the torque available throughout the rpm range for the o.p.'s engine. Probably over 3000 to get the most out of it.
__________________
Doug and Cheryl
2012 FC RB, Michelin 16, ProPride 1400
2016 Ram 1500 Laramie Crew Cab 4X4 Ecodiesel 3.92 axles

The Truth is More Important Than the Facts
dkottum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 02:20 AM   #20
Rivet Master
 
J. Morgan's Avatar
 
1972 31' Sovereign
1975 31' Excella 500
Currently Looking...
Benton , Arkansas
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,868
Images: 11
Tow vehicle fuel question

3,000 RPM is closer to cruise RPM than it is for pulling a really step grade for me.

Even 4,500 rpm or a little more won't hurt the 6.0.

I have pulled some pretty steep grades at 65+, I have only very briefly seen first gear once on an 8% grade south of Globe, AZ, and I never buy anything buy anything but regular gas.
__________________
The fact that I am opinionated does not presuppose that I am wrong......

J. Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Line & Fuel Tank crazeevw Mechanics Corner - Engines, Transmission & More... 4 12-02-2011 07:38 PM
Can you tow a 31' with 12 a bhp tow vehicle? goatfarmer Member Introductions 6 06-30-2010 10:40 PM
Tow, tow tow your Airstream Hhthorny Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches 11 04-12-2008 12:06 AM
Electric fuel pump and fuel line routing cooperhawk Mechanics Corner - Engines, Transmission & More... 7 02-06-2003 10:16 AM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.