|
|
11-28-2008, 10:20 PM
|
#41
|
3 Rivet Member
2007 25' International CCD FB
Gahanna
, Ohio
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 157
|
[QUOTE=REDNAX;642966]
The days of heavy TV's is about over, except for a few. We need, as a group, to understand what our alternatives may be for the day that our current TV's are no longer reliable.
Oh no! Are we entering the "Mad Max" time period of the world? No more heavy TV's? If we can't afford to drive a heavy tow vehicle, we can't afford an Airstream.
Hopefully we don't have any "pioneers" in the airline industry who stretch recommended weight ratings.
yakman
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 11:33 PM
|
#42
|
Rivet Master
2005 25' Safari
Salem
, Oregon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,369
|
Kind of like a gun?
Hi, that'll be the day when they try to pry my cold, dead, fingers off of my Lincoln Navigator steering wheel.
__________________
Bob 2005 Safari 25-B
"Le Petit Chateau Argent" Small Silver Castle
2000 Navigator / 2014 F-150 Eco-Boost / Equal-i-zer / P-3
YAMAHA 2400 / AIR #12144
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 11:42 PM
|
#43
|
Rivet Master
Currently Looking...
St. Catharines
, South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,367
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REDNAX
The days of heavy TV's is about over, except for a few.
|
Yes, the writing has been on the wall for some time now. Without a doubt we are seeing the down slide of the Jurassic era of TV's.
The good news is that the advanced technology, combined with smaller lighter vehicles seems to work, and in many cases be a "better mouse trap". For many, this would include better gas mileage, better handling, and a more comfortable ride overall.
Generally speaking, many believe the future for TV's looks promising.
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 05:23 AM
|
#44
|
2 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
lafayette
, Indiana
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
|
I had a magnum awd three point five that I bought new. It weighed forty two hundred and sucked gas like a drunken sailor guzzling beer. Thats hardly light. I sold it after a year or less of ownership, good riddance. I could not get better than twenty mpg even if driving easily all high way. It was a big car and a big dissapointment.
It was pretty stiffly sprung and the drive train was reputed to be very rugged though so it probably do well as a tow vehicle if the load limits were observed.
It was really good in snow though!
Did I mention with the huge heavy wheels that it rode like a log wagon?
|
|
|
11-29-2008, 04:01 PM
|
#45
|
Vintage Kin
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
I had a magnum awd three point five that I bought new. It weighed forty two hundred and sucked gas like a drunken sailor guzzling beer. Thats hardly light. I sold it after a year or less of ownership, good riddance. I could not get better than twenty mpg even if driving easily all high way. It was a big car and a big dissapointment.
It was pretty stiffly sprung and the drive train was reputed to be very rugged though so it probably do well as a tow vehicle if the load limits were observed.
It was really good in snow though!
Did I mention with the huge heavy wheels that it rode like a log wagon?
|
We rented one and put over 1,000-miles on it in less than a week, a stripper model with the V-6 3.5L. I achieved as high as 27 mpg and averaged at 20 mpg overall, from Salt Lake to Boise, to Spokane and Seattle, on backroads
where possible. I found the gearing and shifts to be right on, visibility to be fine outside of the low windshield, and the ride to be just fine. The car was driven without effort. A good amount of engine time was in cities as we looked at properties (the point of the trip).
So far as I can tell, the Chrysler 300C, with "Heritage" package (has the Daytona R/T suspension) might be the best compromise of comfort and performance for a long-distance touring version of this car (albeit at a premium price).
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 05:52 AM
|
#46
|
2 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
lafayette
, Indiana
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REDNAX
We rented one and put over 1,000-miles on it in less than a week, a stripper model with the V-6 3.5L. I achieved as high as 27 mpg and averaged at 20 mpg overall, from Salt Lake to Boise, to Spokane and Seattle, on backroads
where possible. I found the gearing and shifts to be right on, visibility to be fine outside of the low windshield, and the ride to be just fine. The car was driven without effort. A good amount of engine time was in cities as we looked at properties (the point of the trip).
So far as I can tell, the Chrysler 300C, with "Heritage" package (has the Daytona R/T suspension) might be the best compromise of comfort and performance for a long-distance touring version of this car (albeit at a premium price).
|
I also rented one for a western vacation, actually we rented a stripper 300 chrysler. It had a 2.7 motor. We got excellent mileage in that one, averaging 30 mpg driving the typical western speeds of 75 and more. Based on that I expected excellent mileage on my magnum, but the combination of the 3.5 and perhaps the AWD made for a car that got really poor mileage. I literally got better mileage in my dodge 2500 quad cab with the cummins, both in town and on the road.
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 10:09 AM
|
#48
|
Rivet Master
1977 27' Overlander
Trotwood
, Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Whats the curb weight of a Magnum Wagon? I think Id buy one if it wasn't a Chrysler.
__________________
Roger & MaryLou
___________________
F350 CREWCAB SW LONG BED
7.3 liter Power Stroke Diesel
1977 27ft OVERLANDER
KA8LMQ
AIR # 22336 TAC- OH-7
May your roads be straight and smooth and may you always have a tailwind!
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 11:34 AM
|
#49
|
2 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
lafayette
, Indiana
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikethefixit
Whats the curb weight of a Magnum Wagon? I think Id buy one if it wasn't a Chrysler.
|
My awd wagon with the 3.5 was about 4200#.
The rwd would be around 3900 something.
Note the above post is giving mileage in imperial gallons which are a good bit larger than american gallons so the numbers are higher.
|
|
|
12-03-2008, 09:37 PM
|
#50
|
Site Team
1974 31' Sovereign
Ottawa
, ON
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11,219
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Ruler
Note Imp Gals
|
And 1 Imperial gallon = 1.2 US gallon, so MPG will be what, 20% better unless you do the conversion?
Thankfully, a mile is a mile.
|
|
|
12-04-2008, 07:57 AM
|
#51
|
Rivet Master
1977 27' Overlander
Trotwood
, Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
t walgamuth
Thanks I had no idea they were that heavy. I like the look of that ride.
__________________
Roger & MaryLou
___________________
F350 CREWCAB SW LONG BED
7.3 liter Power Stroke Diesel
1977 27ft OVERLANDER
KA8LMQ
AIR # 22336 TAC- OH-7
May your roads be straight and smooth and may you always have a tailwind!
|
|
|
12-05-2008, 03:48 AM
|
#52
|
2 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
lafayette
, Indiana
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cameront120
I think he said he gets 12mpg in one of his posts.
|
That would surely be Imperial gallons....about 10 mpg us.
|
|
|
12-05-2008, 04:37 PM
|
#53
|
3 Rivet Member
2007 25' International CCD FB
Gahanna
, Ohio
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 157
|
[QUOTE=Road Ruler;643352]The Canadian Natural Resources site rates the 3.5, 4 wheel drive Magnum as getting 20MPG city and 31MPG hwy.
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportatio...lts.cfm?attr=8
The 2.7 in the 2WD Magnum is rated for 25/37 MPG
The 3.5 in the 2WD Magnum is rated for 23/35 MPG
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportatio...lts.cfm?attr=8
2008 Magnum
<< back to Magnum homepage
The SmartWay® certification system identifies each vehicle’s air pollution and greenhouse gas performance.[1] Lower emissions earn a higher score, and those vehicles with the best scores receive certification.
SE
SXT
SXT AWD
R/T
R/T Road/Track
Performance Group
R/T AWD
SRT8
2.7L DOHC 24V V-6
4-Speed Automatic Transmission 190 hp
18 city / 26 hwy* - - - - - -
3.5L High Output SOHC 24V V-6
5-Speed AutoStick® Transmission - 250 hp
17 city / 24 hwy*
250 hp
15 city / 22 hwy* - - - -
5.7L HEMI® V-8 w/MDS
5-Speed AutoStick® Transmission - - - 340 hp
15 city / 23 hwy* 350 hp
15 city / 23 hwy* 340 hp
15 city / 22 hwy* -
6.1L SRT HEMI® V-8
5-Speed AutoStick® Transmission - - - - - - 425 hp
13 city / 18 hwy*
* 2008 EPA estimated miles per gallon, actual mileage may vary with driving conditions.
[1] Based on 2008 EPA SmartWay Designation. Please visit Green Vehicle Guide | US EPA for a list of the specific vehicle types that meet the SmartWay standards. SmartWay is a service mark of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Hopefully this makes more sense for most who know when a gallon is a gallon and a mile is a mile.
I'm just not seeing any fuel savings and the abuse put on this car that's rated for 3,800 lbs of towing capacity ends up costing you a lot more in the long run.
I'm starting to smell a troll.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|