Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-05-2008, 01:37 PM   #101
2 Rivet Member
 
Currently Looking...
Red Deer , Alberta
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by vswingfield View Post
Sorry, but exactly wrong. When the vacuum goes down, you are opening up the throttle. You are implying that you get your greatest economy with your vehicle floorboarded!
Sorry, but exactly right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vswingfield View Post
I gotta admit, "pumping loss" is a new one to me. I can see that there is some inherent loss of energy when pulling a vacuum, but still, the higher the vacuum the less fuel you burn, period.
"Pumping loss" is the technical term for the energy your engine exerts to pump the exhaust out, and draw air in. Air you saying that freeing up exhaust flow does nothing for fuel economy?

You've heard of "displacement on demand" and "mutli displacement system" right? They improve fuel economy because a four cylinder with the throttle wide open and no intake vacuum is more efficient than an eight cylinder with the throttle half closed and loads of vacuum.

The pumping loss is why putting taller gears in the rear end kills the fuel economy. Does the wind resistance magically increase when you put taller gears in? Ofcourse not. But the engine RPM does increase, so you need to close the throttle a little more to keep the mass air flow the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vswingfield View Post
Also, not all diesels are "turbo" diesels. Old Detroit Diesels had a mechanical supercharger (the 6-71 supercharger became famous on 426 hemi drag racers in the 50s and 60s) and were two-stroke diesels. Some other diesels have no supercharging at all.
I'm well aware of the history of engine aspiration methods and application.
canadianguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 06:37 PM   #102
Rivet Master
 
Lumatic's Avatar
 
1971 25' Tradewind
1993 34' Excella
Currently Looking...
Estancia , New Mexico
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,743
Images: 16
Blog Entries: 1
I tow my 71 4200# Tradewind with a 99 F250 Triton, 2wd, auto transmission. I usually tow with the transmission in D and overdrive on. I will turn off overdrive for steep uphills. I get around 12mpg in the 60-65 range.

Given the recent posts about throttle and mpgs would I be any better off towing without overdrive or in drive 2?
__________________
Sail on silver girl. Sail on by. Your time has come to shine.
Lumatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 09:11 PM   #103
2 Rivet Member
 
Currently Looking...
Red Deer , Alberta
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Basically you want the highest gear you can get away with. With an automatic all you can do is give it the option of taking the higher gear, you can't force it into the higher gear. With some vehicles the automatic transmission has a full manual mode though.

Transmissions are getting more and more gears, six in the Chrysler Hemi with automatic, and seven or eight in luxury cars. This combined with throttle by wire lets the computer decide the most efficient combination of gear and throttle opening to give you the power you're requesting.

I'm no Dodge person, but Chrysler has really been leading the way in the Hemi with low fricton coatings on the piston skirts, and heat insulating coatings on the cylinder head and piston crown to improve efficiency. Combine with a six speed automatic and throttle by wire and you can't go wrong.
canadianguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 03:19 PM   #104
"Cloudsplitter"

 
2003 25' Classic
Houstatlantavegas , Malebolgia
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20,000
Images: 1
Wink I'm Happy

Just got back from a trip thru the Adirondacks with the 06 Burb. 8.1L

4:10 diff., 75psi/tires...Ave 11.9 mpg/550 miles,toe/hall mode,Up-hill AND

Down, 15 mph. vertikel wind speed. Toeing the "Frantic Banana".

Whatever flotz your bote.

Stream Safe
__________________
I’m done with ‘adulting’…Let’s go find Bigfoot.
ROBERT CROSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 08:19 PM   #105
Rivet Master
 
Whizzo's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
San Antonio , Texas
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 689
Images: 18
That Big a Difference

On my just-completed 1800 mile round trip on mostly flat land (TX-OK-MO), I ranged from 12.5 to 14.7 MPG. The difference between a standard 65 MPH and slowing down to 60 was amazing. I did use max pressure on all tires (35 TV, 65 TT). Somehow I couldn't convince myself 5 MPH made that much difference.

This compares to 9-10 MPG with the same TV and the SOB. I reckon A/S's claim of 15% better mileage is no exaggeration.

My medium-sized truck has a short tank (22 gal), so getting around 250 miles of range was a real bonus. Heck, I wish I'd bought an A/S three years ago!
__________________

Whizzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
gas mileage, tow vehicles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.