Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-24-2010, 05:45 PM   #1
Wise Elder
 
Jammer's Avatar
 
2010 30' Classic
Vintage Kin Owner
South of the river , Minnesota
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,119
Ford Excursion revisited

There are any number of threads about the Ford Excursion and its suitability as a tow vehicle.

They are all pretty much from the days of yore.

For those of you who have Excursions or have had them in the past, how are these vehicles holding up with the passage of years? Mileage? Service life? Spark plugs still a problem on the V10? Intercooler still a problem on the 6.0?

Looking at the 2000-2005 era tow vehicles the diesel Excursions and the big block 'burbs seem to be the obvious choices for those of us who want 4wd but need more room than a pickup provides.
__________________

__________________
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 06:38 PM   #2
Rivet Master
 
HowieE's Avatar
 
1991 34' Excella
Princeton , New Jersey
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,814
Images: 12
The Excursion was never designed to be a tow vehicle. It was for soccer moms to haul the kids.

When I bought my 04 diesel Excursion I have to redesign the suspension by replacing, heavier, the front stabilizer and installing a rear stabilizer. While this did improve the wandering tenancy some that Ford built into the truck it did not provide the ride or stability that you get with a 2500 Sub.

Others have gone so far as to replace the Ford steering box with an after market one and replace the springs with a Ford 250 spring set, and have the caster angle reset, this directly addresses the wandering issue.
__________________

__________________
WBCCI 12156 AIR 3144 WACHUNG TAC NJ6
2004 Excursion 4x4
1991 34 ft. Excella +220,000 miles, new laminated flooring, new upholstery, new 3200 lbs axles

HowieE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 06:51 PM   #3
Rivet Master
 
rideair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,223
I've had two Ford diesel Excursions, had one from 24K-99K (2001)then sold it for a 2002 with 46K and it currently has 256K and still running strong. Both had the 7.3 and I have a 2000 F250 CrewCab/8' bed/4WD 7.3 with over 275K.

Biggest problem is ball joints/axle joints. With the heavy diesel, Its h*ll on the ball joints and the factory axle joints do not have grease fittings so they will go bad. I've had to replace other things waterpump, alt, etc... but all are standard wear/tear items.

If I could find another 7.3 Excursion or F250/F350 CrewCab/8'/4WD with low miles I'd buy it in a heart beat.

The 7.3 is your friend, less smog crap, Ford had not stuck their nose into it, etc... Find one, buy it, take care of it and when the engine finally fails, replace the engine.

If you do plan to buy a 6.0, I would suggest staying away from the first year started mid-2003 (mid year 2003 switched from 7.3 to 6.0) they were known to have problems with the heads from what I've heard.

Good luck
__________________
Paul Waddell
rideair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 07:09 PM   #4
2 Rivet Member
 
seldencove's Avatar
 
1963 28' Ambassador
Lyme , Connecticut
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 88
Images: 16
My Excursion tows my 63 Ambassador like a dream. I have the v-10 and love it. It's just like all vehicles, they need parts once and a while. Ford never should have stopped production of them, I agree my V-10 drinks the fuel down at 10mpg while towing, but it always gets us there in comfort and safely.
__________________
2005 Ford Excursion V-10
Reese Trunnion Bar with dual cam sway control
Prodigy P3 brake control
seldencove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 07:55 PM   #5
Rivet Master
 
c_lewis77's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
Brunswick , Georgia
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,084
Images: 22
I have a 2000 excursion v10 towing my 34' limited, no problems at all. I actually prefer the excusion over the 2007 gmc 2500 that was my previous tow vehicle. The 7.3 turbo diesel is the best setup cor the excursion in my opinion. Love my excursion!
__________________
c_lewis77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 08:43 PM   #6
Rivet Master
 
ALANSD's Avatar

 
1966 26' Overlander
Woodstock , Georgia
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,463
I have a V10 and put many miles on it towing three different Airstreams. It pulls great, gets decent mileage 12-14 on regular.
I agree ball joints can be problematic, but other than minor electrical issues, I have had a solid safe reliable vehicle. And you can get em relatively cheap.
I hear the v10 is a 300k+ motor. I have 138000 on mine.
__________________
1966 Overlander
AIR #005
Please visit our blogs and web pages:
OUR AIRSTREAM PASSION! BLOG
RESTORING AN AIRSTREAM
Our AIRSTREAM and TIN CAN TOURIST Rallys
ALANSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 08:57 PM   #7
3 Rivet Member
 
Archersfin's Avatar
 
1986 34' Excella
Conroe , Texas
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 118
Images: 19
I have a 2000 Excursion 4x with diesel. Other than the front wheel bearings being replaced at 165000 mi no problems at all. I did buy it new and have taken care of it. It now has a little over 178000 mi on it and still runs strong. I get 17mph on the hwy and 15 in town. When I am pulling my 34' Airstream it gets 14mph which I think is very reasonable. I don't think you can go wrong with the older 7.3 diesel and low mileage. You can find one out there if you just look.
Good Luck
__________________
_____________________________________________
"I love work, I can sit and watch it for hours."

Al
Archersfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 09:51 PM   #8
Site Team
 
Aage's Avatar
 
1974 31' Sovereign
Ottawa , ON
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11,204
Images: 25
FWIW, here is the CR "Model Summary" on the Excursion as a used vehicle:

The enormous Excursion was introduced for 2000. Derived from the Ford "SuperDuty" pickup-truck chassis, the Excursion offers V8, V8 turbodiesel, and V10 engines.

The V10 we tested delivered just adequate oomph, but it slurped down more than a gallon of fuel while covering just 10 miles of mixed-road driving. The ride is stiff, bouncy, and uncomfortable.

The Excursion's vast bulk makes it difficult to hold in a traffic lane, and its slow and vague steering demands constant attention. The brakes are inferior.

A huge interior, a commanding view out, roomy three-row seating, and tremendous towing capacity are among this model's few virtues. 2005 was its final year.


They also agree on the steering weaknesses.

THE DRIVING EXPERIENCE

The Excursion serves up a hard, uncomfortable, trucklike ride: It bounces abruptly, rocks side to side, and pitches upward. A full load makes little difference. The cabin is noisy.

The Excursion's vast bulk makes it difficult to place in the traffic lane, and its slow steering demands plenty of attention from the driver. A wide turning circle makes parking a chore.

On our track, the Excursion felt sloppy and ungainly, though secure. Its bulk was very difficult to coax through our avoidance maneuver.

The 6.8-liter, 310-hp V10 makes a lot of noise but accelerates adequately. Overall fuel economy averaged a mere 10 mpg on regular fuel. The Excursion did a good job of pulling a 7,200-pound trailer from 0 to 60 mph in 22 seconds. The four-speed automatic transmission shifts smoothly enough but doesn't downshift as well as some.
__________________
“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.”
...John Wayne...........................
Aage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 12:49 AM   #9
Rivet Master
 
Mexray's Avatar
 
1978 28' Ambassador
Morada , California
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,583
I have to take exception with Howie's remark:

"The Excursion was never designed to be a tow vehicle. It was for soccer moms to haul the kids."

The Excursion is built on a 3/4 ton Ford super duty pick-up chassis, and is probably the heaviest, and longest WB, SUV, which I say IS designed for towing - Ford's specs bear that out, as does all the HD equipment on the Exc when ordered for towing - larger alternator, larger radiator, additional trans and engine oil coolers, towing electrical harness, fuses, relays, heavy frame mounted tow hitch, etc., and probably many more items that I'm not familiar with...

We bought our 2001, V-10, 4x4 with just over 110K miles on the 'clock' - now have about 135K...we bought ours with the specific purpose of towing our 28 ft AS, and it's the perfect TV for this purpose - we didn't want a diesel.

It would also be hard to find a better deal on a 'used' HD, SUV around these days, due to the higher MPG figures that most people want to avoid - but hey, 10 MPG towing is also about the best you're going to find (non-diesel) at such a reasonable purchase pride!

Ours was a dealer trade-in, and have been 'tuned up' and new tires installed before we got it - however, who ever installed the new plugs, didn't torque them properly, and we had two of them 'blow' - which I found an easy adapter fix for, re-torqued the rest, and haven't had any more problems in 20K miles of towing - had I known, I'd have checked the plugs first and probably wouldn't have had any problems...

I think the Excursion is a great choice as a TV for our AS - I like the fact that we're in this heavy vehicle, and as such, the 'tail' doesn't get much chance to 'wag' the dog! - In other words, our towing experiences have shown virtually no sway problems using an Equali-zer WD hitch!

Don't forget that most all Excursions are quipped with lots of interior goodies as well, which makes those longer trips a bit more bearable...

Ray
__________________
Ray & Pat; Morada, CA
Mexray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 07:31 AM   #10
3 Rivet Member
 
airstream66's Avatar
 
1966 30' Sovereign
Bethany , Illinois
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 136
Images: 22
Has anyone had experience with one with a 5.4L? I like that motor in my wife's 1/2 ton, but didn't know if it had enough power for an Excursion/F250 sized vehicle plus our airstream. I have been looking for one for a few years, but they just don't fall in your lap.
__________________
Cory, Angie, and 'Lucy'
1966 Sovereign International
2003 Black Chevy Silverado w/q-steer
airstream66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 08:43 AM   #11
Rivet Master
 
HowieE's Avatar
 
1991 34' Excella
Princeton , New Jersey
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,814
Images: 12
Those that might be interested in the limitations of the Excursion I suggest you sign into F-Series & SuperDuty Diesel Forums forum and start by reading this post.
F-Series & SuperDuty Diesel Forums

There are dozens more threads on this subject on that forum and any other forum dedicated to the Excursion.
__________________
WBCCI 12156 AIR 3144 WACHUNG TAC NJ6
2004 Excursion 4x4
1991 34 ft. Excella +220,000 miles, new laminated flooring, new upholstery, new 3200 lbs axles

HowieE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 09:19 AM   #12
Rivet Master
 
c_lewis77's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
Brunswick , Georgia
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,084
Images: 22
@Aage: I have to laugh when I read the consumer reports review of the Excursion. The size takes getting used to if you dont drive somethig this big on a regular basis.

What CR fails to address is that the EX/F-250 super duty trucks are purpose built. They are made for towing/ hauling/ and taking a beating period. It weighs a hair under 10,000 lbs and drives accordingly. I am on my third 3/4 Tn truck and have found that they are all very well built and all have similar turn radius/ gas milage/ large vehicle issues that one would and should expect.
If you want 40 MPG buy a civic; If you want to run a slolum at 40 mph without body sway, buy a BMW. If you want to tow a large heavy trailer buy a tow vehicle (Ex/ F-250/350, 2500); I find it somewhat comforting having a vehicle that outweighs my trailer; the super duty fords have always towed well for me.
CR also failed to note that the steering (sans the turning radius) actually is better for towing, I am not sure that I would want a steering system that was overly sensitive- great for a bimmer, not for a tow vehicle.
As far as "difficulty placing it in the traffic lane", that sounds like someone is not used to the size. I can back my Ex through a key hole!

....just my thoughts at least, maybe CR finds that a civic tows quite well I will stick with the Excursion!
__________________
c_lewis77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 10:32 AM   #13
2 Rivet Member
 
RossFam05BH's Avatar
 
2005 30' Safari
Pfafftown , North Carolina
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aage View Post
The brakes are inferior.
Wrong

We have a 2002 2WD Excursion with the 7.3 L diesel. On our trip this summer the disc brakes on our 8000 lb. bunkhouse sprung a leak. For a couple of hours in ID, I didn't even know we were driving without trailer brakes because the Excursion stopped the trailer perfectly. After this experience, I have decided that all of our Airstreams in the present and future will be towed by the Excursion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aage View Post
A huge interior, a commanding view out, roomy three-row seating, and tremendous towing capacity are among this model's few virtues.

Right, especially if you replace the "few" with "many"


We carry 3 adults, 2 children, 2 dogs and 1 cat comfortably in air-conditioned bliss for 6 weeks at a time during the summer. Air-conditioning for the pets is a must because we often travel to the desert southwest. Our previous tow vehicle, a crew-cab, long-bed GMC 2500HD could not do this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Aage View Post
The Excursion serves up a hard, uncomfortable, trucklike ride: It bounces abruptly, rocks side to side, and pitches upward. A full load makes little difference. The cabin is noisy. The Excursion's vast bulk makes it difficult to place in the traffic lane, and its slow steering demands plenty of attention from the driver. A wide turning circle makes parking a chore.

Wrong

The 2WD version of the Excursion has a car-like ride and the turning circle is surprisingly tight. Perhaps most telling: my wife, who hates driving the GMC, has no problem driving the Excursion, with or without trailer.
__________________
2005 30' Bunkhouse "Nedapedalua"
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L Diesel 2WD
2007 Interstate
WBCCI #5182
AIR # 6050
RossFam05BH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 12:48 PM   #14
Rivet Master
 
ALANSD's Avatar

 
1966 26' Overlander
Woodstock , Georgia
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,463
by the way I get 17-18 mpg not towing on the highway. V10. Very smooth and powerful.
The truck saved our butt when a semi stopped short in front of us on I -95 we swerved hard from our lane to the next on the left--pulling a 31' Airstream. ..at 60 mph.
__________________

__________________
1966 Overlander
AIR #005
Please visit our blogs and web pages:
OUR AIRSTREAM PASSION! BLOG
RESTORING AN AIRSTREAM
Our AIRSTREAM and TIN CAN TOURIST Rallys
ALANSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford Excursion Diesel Silverfoxrae Tow Vehicles 19 12-16-2010 09:12 AM
Ford Excursion (Diesel) Advice big_john Tow Vehicles 20 05-15-2010 11:15 AM
Ford Excursion Diesel tslanier Tow Vehicles 9 07-21-2009 11:20 AM
Ford Excursion Tire Recall startrekker2001 Tow Vehicles 25 07-20-2004 09:46 AM
Shock Absorbers for Ford Excursion Ed Keyes Tow Vehicles 2 06-12-2004 06:29 PM


Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.