Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-24-2013, 05:04 PM   #43
Rivet Master
 
Alumaholic's Avatar

 
1966 24' Tradewind
Albuquerque , New Mexico
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,751
Images: 33
I'm on my second Silverado 2500 HD crewcab with Duramax.
This one a 2007 has the 6-speed Allison transmission. (The first one was a 2005 with 5-speed tranny.) The Duramax/Allison combination is unbelievable for towing safely and efficiently.
I had had four tow vehicles (including a 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 with Cummins turbo diesel) before buying the 2005 Chevy Silverado new in April 2005 for an Airstream Rally on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon. The towing experience was delightful.
__________________

__________________
Ken L
1966 Tradewind 24
2007Chevy Silverado 2500 HD Duramax/Allison
Four Corners Unit WBCCI #8654
Alumaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 05:58 PM   #44
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 11,832
I tow with a Tundra. We have 5 Duramax diesels at work. I have towed with these extensively and in the mountains of North Carolina. The diesels do have more bottom end torque, but honestly, having towed with both there honestly isn't a nickle's worth of difference. Please hear me out before you go pay 45-60k for a truck and get disappointed. The Duramax is a great truck, but not great enough for me to go into debt for. If you are independently wealthy and money is no object and you are paying cash anyway...go ahead and get a Duramax. They are restyled for 2014. That may not matter. It wouldn't matter to me. I kinda like the 2013 body style better.
__________________

__________________
2013 Classic 30 Limited
2007 Silver Toyota Tundra Crew Max Limited 5.7 iForce
2006 Vivid Black Harley-Davidson Road King Classic
1999 Black Nissan Pathfinder LE
TAC #MS-10
WBCCI #1811, Region 6, Unit 56
Airforums #70955
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 06:16 PM   #45
Vintage Kin
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,589
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFScheck View Post
Can't let such a blanket statement go without a response in fear of some folks becoming misinformed...

Disc brakes on the trailer do not stop faster than drums on the trailerr.

Then why do we have them on four corners of our tow vehicles? They are better in all respects, with no exceptions. As one who has decades of time/experience in making drums work their best on cars, trucks and trailers there is no comparison. Making drums their best is constant upkeep and they are worthless in rain, on gravel and are constantly out of adjustment. Controls over disc is matter of fine-tuning. Threads to that very effect around here. Drums set that very day might bring the combined rig rig down hard and fast, I've done it. But not the next. Discs, no problem once installed and minimal tuning done once.

Diesel braking going downhill save both TV brakes and trailers brakes while minimizing the potential of drums overheating thus fading before discs (advantage disc have over brakes).

Any vehicle, properly-driven, 1973 or 2013 can do the same. Given discs or drums. No one would choose drums on the TV when it is a choice. The only reason they remain on the TT is that THOR has no intention of improving what really matters . . sorry to those who thought a bare aluminum interior matters or Corian countertops.


As applied to Airstreams - electric over Hydraylic often have a "lag" or pause as compared to electric over electric.

Yes, and it can be minimized if not eliminated. See thread by GCinSC on this for but one [very good] example.


From someone who has experience with the above configurations and settings....
And from someone else who apparently has more. Readers are invited to do their own explorations of the topic. Trailer brakes stop the trailer. Tow vehicle brakes stop that vehicle. If it is necessary to use the TV to stop the TT then the TV is not at fault. Now, how well can your TT stop the combined rig without the use of TV brakes . . a European test, by the way, necessary for certification in combined rigs of this type. I recommend one tries it at 15-mph. Do it from 60-mph if you already have a new set of drums/shoes on hand. Maybe bearings/seals as well. But wait for tomorrrow to cool it off.

The OP can or will buy a bigger vehicle. He can also equip his TT with discs and upgrade his hitch beyond just setting it up on a weight scale to maximize current TV performance. Those items, hitch and TT discs, stay with the TT no matter what TV is eventually chosen if that route is attractive. It is certainly cheaper in the short run, and highly valuable over the long run.

There is more to it than just buying a bigger truck as that rarely solves the problem past increased TV payload requirement. Big as the problem of money may be, there is a downside that is more than just money in increasing TV size without commensurate performance changes.

.
__________________
1990 35' Silver Streak Sterling; 9k GVWR.
2004 DODGE Cummins 305/555; 6-manual; 9k GVWR.
Hensley Arrow. 9-cpm solo, 15-cpm towing
Sold: Silver Streak Model 3411
slowmover is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 07:09 PM   #46
Rivet Master
 
Alumaholic's Avatar

 
1966 24' Tradewind
Albuquerque , New Mexico
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,751
Images: 33
Concur with slowmover. I love the disc brakes on my Airstream.
__________________
Ken L
1966 Tradewind 24
2007Chevy Silverado 2500 HD Duramax/Allison
Four Corners Unit WBCCI #8654
Alumaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:02 PM   #47
3 Rivet Member
 
Pat Conway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 128
As price comparison between 5.7 tundra and GM Duramax came up in this discussion I took a look at both vehicles on traderonline.com on a nation wide search. I remembered paying $31000 for my new Duramax 2007 Sierra Classic W/T August of 07 which included a $5000 end of year discount. Now, there are many well equipped Duramax $38K-40k, about 10K below MSRP. I noticed many 5.7 tundra close to or equal in price to 2013 Duramax. Just FYI
__________________
Sun City Center, FL
1988 25' Excella
Pat Conway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:26 PM   #48
Rivet Master
 
dkottum's Avatar
 
2012 25' Flying Cloud
Battle Lake , Minnesota
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Conway View Post
As price comparison between 5.7 tundra and GM Duramax came up in this discussion I took a look at both vehicles on traderonline.com on a nation wide search. I remembered paying $31000 for my new Duramax 2007 Sierra Classic W/T August of 07 which included a $5000 end of year discount. Now, there are many well equipped Duramax $38K-40k, about 10K below MSRP. I noticed many 5.7 tundra close to or equal in price to 2013 Duramax. Just FYI
But the o.p. already owns the Tundra.

doug k
__________________
dkottum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 05:45 AM   #49
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 11,832
Original sticker price for our Duramax- 54k
Original sticker price for my Tundra- 42k
Original purchase price for Duramax- 40k
Original purchase price for Tundra- 30k
Both have too small of a fuel tank.
Both are similarly equipped- except the Duramax is 4x4.
I won't trade simply because I already own a Tundra with 27,000 miles.
Even if they allow me 25k on a 40k truck I owe 15k which would have to be financed.
If I were a millionaire or if i earned 200k per year I might view things differently.
__________________
2013 Classic 30 Limited
2007 Silver Toyota Tundra Crew Max Limited 5.7 iForce
2006 Vivid Black Harley-Davidson Road King Classic
1999 Black Nissan Pathfinder LE
TAC #MS-10
WBCCI #1811, Region 6, Unit 56
Airforums #70955
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 06:32 AM   #50
Rivet Master
 
JFScheck's Avatar
 
Vintage Kin Owner
Rockville , Maryland
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,474
Images: 33
Slowmover - I highly doubt you have more experience than I on this subject in regards to both my towing arena and actual experience with both platforms and my on track endeavors to include vintage car racing but I also just don't feel like arguing the fact.

How often I am reminded why 2Airishuman has left the forum.

Later
__________________
John "JFScheck" Scheck
2015 Roadtrek CS Adventurous XL
2015 Mercedes Sprinter 3500 XL Chassis with Mercedes BlueTec V6 Diesel
**I Love U.S.A.**
JFScheck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 08:26 AM   #51
Fluffin
 
fluffin's Avatar
 
2012 27' FB International
Charlotte, NC , St. Marys, Ga
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 20
OK, for the record... Towing 25k gas at 7 mpg = @ $12,500... Towing 25k Duramax at 17 mpg = @ $5,500... In and around 50k gas at 14.5 mpg = 12,500... 50k Duramax at 18.7 mpg = @ $9000... Total for mixed driving 75k gas = @ $25,000 Duramax = @ $15,000... Saving $10k in first 75k miles using gas at 3.559 per gallon and diesel at 3.759 per gallon.... Duramax/Allison $8k option payback in first 70,000 miles.... gas engine/transmission life likely 150k before major work, less if doing heavy towing... Duramax likely 250k+.... This what I based my decision on fuel and maintenance savings, along with exhaust brake saving truck brake wear, integrated trailer brake controller, class V 2 ½” hitch receiver, exceptional smooth and quiet ride and increased safe towing capacity. Everyone has their own criteria; this truck meets and exceeds mine….
__________________
Mike and Myra
Saint Marys, GA and Charlotte, NC
"Lovin' The Life"
O'Flitter and Muffin The Wonder Dogs
fluffin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 08:51 AM   #52
New Member
 
Baltimore , Maryland
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by m.hony View Post
I tow with a Tundra. We have 5 Duramax diesels at work. I have towed with these extensively and in the mountains of North Carolina. The diesels do have more bottom end torque, but honestly, having towed with both there honestly isn't a nickle's worth of difference. Please hear me out before you go pay 45-60k for a truck and get disappointed. The Duramax is a great truck, but not great enough for me to go into debt for. If you are independently wealthy and money is no object and you are paying cash anyway...go ahead and get a Duramax. They are restyled for 2014. That may not matter. It wouldn't matter to me. I kinda like the 2013 body style better.
Just a quick correction, only the GM 1500 trucks are being re-styled for 2014, As of now, 2015 would be the earliest but probably 2016 for the GM HD's being re-styled.

And for what it's worth, we have a 2012 GMC 2500 HD Denali, it rides just a touch harder than a luxury sports car and we get 25 mpg at 65 mph (not towing) with cruise set. And while some will consider it a useless option, the air conditioned seats rock on long, summer drives
__________________
beachrats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 09:50 AM   #53
2 Rivet Member
 
drunkensloth's Avatar
 
1965 17' Caravel
Knights Landing , California
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 60
All the gas engines for the gm trucks are getting powertrain changes for 2014. I mention it because someone was talking about the 6.2l. Biggest change being direct injection. The 6.2 L86 is rated at 425hp and 450lb-ft. What a beast!
__________________
drunkensloth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 11:26 AM   #54
Home of Vortex tuning
 
CDONA's Avatar
 
2013 27' FB Eddie Bauer
Spearfish , South Dakota
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 523
Images: 9
Just a bit off topic,
'06 chevy diesel was first year of the 6 speed allison.
What year was the start of the DEF fluid smog controls?

I've talked myself into the Chevy over Dodge, Ford, for the stronger tranny.
I hope there is a year or two to cherry pick a good one, , ,
__________________
"Chip Tank" is in Paso Robles Ca..
CDONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 11:31 AM   #55
Rivet Master
 
2007 25' Safari FB SE
Suburbia , Sunny So Cal
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,756
Short answer. No

Long answer. No, not at all.
__________________
I'd rather be boon docking in the desert.

WBCCI 6731 FCU
AIR# 13896
CA 4
Goin camping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 01:28 PM   #56
Rivet Master
 
1976 31' Sovereign
Oswego , Illinois
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,330
Blog Entries: 1
Smile slotted rotors

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpcaudill View Post
Just wanted to see what other members think. Presently, my wife and I have an 08' Tundra double cab set up pretty well for towing. I put on EBC slotted brakes (after the OEMs warped), along with the TRD rear sway bar and Toyo all terrain load range C tires.
GM presently has some pretty good rebates going on; enough to where I'm considering going (back) to a Duramax 2500 extended cab.
The Tundra just doesn't have the guts to pull our new International Serenity (front bedroom) 25' around like I would like it to considering the amount of hills we have here in Alaska. I'm never in full auto, but instead manually shifting between 3rd and 5th trying to maintain a "reasonable" 50 to 60 mph. Plus, I'm concerned about having my GVW too high for this vehicle.
Am still sitting pretty well with the Toyota regarding trade in value, but just want to make sure the Duramax isn't too much vehicle. I'm presently using the Reese Dual Cam hitch system and don't plan on changing.
Just figured it would be better to ask for opinions before I take this 17 grand plunge..
Thanks in advance...
Pat
Wy put slotted rotors on they are basicly for racing and will wear pads much faster
__________________

__________________
featherbedder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.