Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:14 AM   #61
Rivet Master
 
2008 23' Safari FB SE
Boulder , Colorado
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 510
To add to my post, the TSB is TS-B 0151-10 and 0151-10 rev 2.
bonginator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 09:23 AM   #62
Rivet Master
 
switz's Avatar

 
2014 31' Classic
2015 23' International
2013 25' FB International
Apache Junction , Arizona
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,223
Images: 9
Tongue weights in pounds per the 2011 Airstream specifications sheet:

Classic 27FB 792
Classic 30 773
Classic 31 805
Classic 34 710

Flying Cloud/International 30 880

Note that real world weights could be two to three hundred pounds higher depending on the hitch selected.
__________________
WBCCI Life Member 5123, AIR 70341, 4CU, WD9EMC

TV - 2012 Dodge 2500 4x4 Cummins HO, automatic, Centramatics, Kelderman level ride airbag suspension, bed shell

2014 31' Classic w/ twin beds, 50 amp service, 1000 watt solar system, Centramatics, Tuson TPMS, 12" disc brakes, 16" tires & wheels
switz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:15 AM   #63
4 Rivet Member
 
Air-Texas's Avatar
 
2004 34' Classic S/O
Stafford , Virginia
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedecanada View Post
I own 34 foot and can tell you that you will not be happy with Toyota pulling that trailer you need 3/4 ton or more suspension and brakes to be happy.
When I bought my 2004 34' with a slide, tongue weigh around 1200lbs, I had to trade, my paid for 2010 Toyota Sequoia 5.8 v8, for a Ford F250. The trailer would push the Sequoia around on turns, and wore out the inside of the back tires on the 6 hour drive home. I don’t even know it there with the F250.
__________________
Mike, Miho &

S/OS#069
TAC # TX-33
WBCCI #5702

"Eva" 2004 Classic Limited 34' S/O
"Wall-E" 2012 Ford F250 King Ranch
Air-Texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 08:34 PM   #64
3 Rivet Member
 
Urbanologist's Avatar
 
2009 34' Panamerica
2008 22' Safari
Metro Detroit Area & Metro Dallas Area , Michigan & Texas
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air-Texas View Post
When I bought my 2004 34' with a slide, tongue weigh around 1200lbs, I had to trade, my paid for 2010 Toyota Sequoia 5.8 v8, for a Ford F250. The trailer would push the Sequoia around on turns, and wore out the inside of the back tires on the 6 hour drive home. I don’t even know it there with the F250.
Well, here we go again. I tow my 34' PanAM with a 2010 Tundra 4x2 CrewMax 5.7L. I do not get "pushed around" or turns or breaking! Google CanAm RV, London, Ontario, CAN. They are the experts on towing and hitch setups. In FACT, they have towed - SAFELY - 34' Airstream Classics with Taurus SHO's and Jags! Anybody getting shoved around NEEDS proper hitch and brake controller to the trailer brakes - not just the vehicle's tow assist. Andy, the owner of CanAm will talk to you and guide you EXPERTLY. He is a liaison to the SAE on the coming 2015 truck towing standards. Standards that Toyota already adopted AHEAD of all other truck builders!!
Urbanologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 08:52 PM   #65
Site Team
 
Aage's Avatar
 
1974 31' Sovereign
Ottawa , ON
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11,219
Images: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanologist View Post
In FACT, they have towed - SAFELY - 34' Airstream Classics with Taurus SHO's and Jags!
Yes, I got my TV and '74 Sov done by Can-Am (and I'm very pleased with it), and we speak from time to time. I did discuss a 34-footer with a S/O and he made it clear that this was over the limit, and off the table. Most of the problem was that it would overload the tongue weight severely.

Andy at Can-Am didn't seem to like the S/O AS TTs much, and I gathered it was from an engineering point of view. I can't speak for him though, so I will leave it for him to comment if he wants to...
__________________
“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.”
...John Wayne...........................
Aage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 04:14 AM   #66
4 Rivet Member
 
Air-Texas's Avatar
 
2004 34' Classic S/O
Stafford , Virginia
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanologist View Post
Well, here we go again. I tow my 34' PanAM with a 2010 Tundra 4x2 CrewMax 5.7L. I do not get "pushed around" or turns or breaking! Google CanAm RV, London, Ontario, CAN. They are the experts on towing and hitch setups. In FACT, they have towed - SAFELY - 34' Airstream Classics with Taurus SHO's and Jags! Anybody getting shoved around NEEDS proper hitch and brake controller to the trailer brakes - not just the vehicle's tow assist. Andy, the owner of CanAm will talk to you and guide you EXPERTLY. He is a liaison to the SAE on the coming 2015 truck towing standards. Standards that Toyota already adopted AHEAD of all other truck builders!!
I did call them, and Andy told me that my 34' Classic Limited with slide-out might be too much for the 2010 Toyota Sequoia, and it was...
But YMMV, best of luck to you.
__________________
Mike, Miho &

S/OS#069
TAC # TX-33
WBCCI #5702

"Eva" 2004 Classic Limited 34' S/O
"Wall-E" 2012 Ford F250 King Ranch
Air-Texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 06:57 AM   #67
Rivet Master
 
1988 25' Excella
1987 32' Excella
Knoxville , Tennessee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,118
Blog Entries: 1
Do not have a thing against the Tundra. Have friends who tow with them. Parked my dodge diesel next to one at a rally last fall. What I do not see is the real advantage of the Tundra. It was just as tall, long, and wide as my Dodge. It cost more. It gets worse fuel milage. I have 125000 miles with few repairs. So what really is the advantage of towing with the half ton?
Bill M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:52 AM   #68
3 Rivet Member
 
Urbanologist's Avatar
 
2009 34' Panamerica
2008 22' Safari
Metro Detroit Area & Metro Dallas Area , Michigan & Texas
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill M. View Post
Do not have a thing against the Tundra. Have friends who tow with them. Parked my dodge diesel next to one at a rally last fall. What I do not see is the real advantage of the Tundra. It was just as tall, long, and wide as my Dodge. It cost more. It gets worse fuel milage. I have 125000 miles with few repairs. So what really is the advantage of towing with the half ton?
Unless you ALREADY own a 3/4 ton tow vehicle, too many Airstream Newbie's will immediately conclude that they NEED a big truck to safely deal with a Airstream. That makes them pay dearly for more truck than they NEED! The majority of people are not going to need or buy extra big Airstream's, or need a truck that costs more for fuel, as a everyday vehicle. That diesel power plant is a bunch out extra cash just to feel superior for the time that MOST actually USE their Airstreams. The reason Toyota doesn't offer diesel - per my dealer - is that extra power is NOT needed by most people, even guys that grew up with Tonka Toys. Use that money to buy more trailer -- or fuel. Countless Airstream trailers get sold because they really are not used much after being purchased, so why add a costly 'work class' truck to your driveway needlessly?! If you already have a big rig, so be it. If not, don't get one unless it's REALLY going to be put to more than casual use. My Tundra serves as a daily use vehicle. I don't need a 3/4 ton truck to go to the job or shopping.
Urbanologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 09:23 AM   #69
Rivet Master
 
1988 25' Excella
1987 32' Excella
Knoxville , Tennessee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,118
Blog Entries: 1
So what is the advantage of the Toyota?
Bill M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 09:46 AM   #70
3 Rivet Member
 
Urbanologist's Avatar
 
2009 34' Panamerica
2008 22' Safari
Metro Detroit Area & Metro Dallas Area , Michigan & Texas
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill M. View Post
So what is the advantage of the Toyota?
It will LAST a long time AND be much more reliable than other brands. Look how many other brands are traded in for Tundras -- and even Ford had to up their game due to Toyota Tundra!
Urbanologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 11:49 AM   #71
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 12,111
I had the Tundra before I had the trailer-
When I bought the truck I picked out exactly what I wanted.
The Tundra costs more than a diesel- no!
16 mpg is about as good as it gets for the Tundra.
I don't like how diesels sound or smell.
The fuel is more.
The oil changes are more.
To each his own.
Everyone has a reason for and the right to own whatever they want to spend their money on.
I am at a rally now with the only Tundra and the only Airstream.
__________________
2013 Classic 30 Limited
2007 Silver Toyota Tundra Crew Max Limited 5.7 iForce
2006 Vivid Black Harley-Davidson Road King Classic
1999 Black Nissan Pathfinder LE
TAC #MS-10
WBCCI #1811, Region 6, Unit 56
Airforums #70955
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 01:47 PM   #72
Rivet Master
 
Moflash's Avatar
 
2007 28' International CCD
Springfield , Missouri
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,423
If you trade every 3 years or so a F350 or F250 Turbo diesel cost of ownership is about the same as a 1/2 ton(depreciation and upkeep)
There is no diesel smell
Oil changes are $89 at the Ford dealership
When driving a diesel the new ones are as quiet as a gas engine
I drive mine like a car everyday it rides great.
I can take things with me without any worry of going over my payload capacity.A 8 foot box with a crew cab is not available in a 1/2 ton. I can take a Harley or a 2up 4wheeler with me (those little 5.5 or 6.5 boxes don't do it for me)
With 400 horsepower and 800foot lbs of torque I get 20-22 mpg Hwy and 13-16mpg stop and go city.
I have had many 1/2 tons including Toyotas,Fords,Chevys but for what I do when traveling with my Airstream I will never go back to a 1/2 ton.

As you say to each his own.
Moflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 03:06 PM   #73
3 Rivet Member
 
Urbanologist's Avatar
 
2009 34' Panamerica
2008 22' Safari
Metro Detroit Area & Metro Dallas Area , Michigan & Texas
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moflash View Post
If you trade every 3 years or so a F350 or F250 Turbo diesel cost of ownership is about the same as a 1/2 ton(depreciation and upkeep) There is no diesel smell Oil changes are $89 at the Ford dealership When driving a diesel the new ones are as quiet as a gas engine I drive mine like a car everyday it rides great. I can take things with me without any worry of going over my payload capacity.A 8 foot box with a crew cab is not available in a 1/2 ton. I can take a Harley or a 2up 4wheeler with me (those little 5.5 or 6.5 boxes don't do it for me) With 400 horsepower and 800foot lbs of torque I get 20-22 mpg Hwy and 13-16mpg stop and go city. I have had many 1/2 tons including Toyotas,Fords,Chevys but for what I do when traveling with my Airstream I will never go back to a 1/2 ton. As you say to each his own.
OMG! Trading every 3 years!! That's real COSTLY "ownership" -- essentially giving new vehicles away. Yes, To each his own. I'm SURE Ford investors just love that concept. Upside- down on every trade-in.
Urbanologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 03:24 PM   #74
2 Rivet Member
 
Libo's Avatar
 
2010 31' Classic
Crestview , Florida
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 58
Blog Entries: 1
We have an '08 Tundra 4 x 4. We have put on 25000 miles on it just within the past 2 years, pulling a 30 ft. Classic. Last weight was 15360 truck and trailer at the DOT of Florida.

We have traveled many mountains on the west coast and had no problems climbing and coming down. Flat driving is about 14 mpg. Mountains are less.

Just bought a 2013 Tundra double cab 2 x 4. We wouldn't consider buying another truck, judging from our experience.
Libo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 03:41 PM   #75
Rivet Master
 
RickDavis's Avatar
 
1961 24' Tradewind
1969 29' Ambassador
1970 21' Globetrotter
Jamestown , Tennessee
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,783
It appears to me it has been pretty well established that the Tundra can do the job, and is for many people. While I personally believe in severe overkill in the TV department, my needs/wants are much different than the person who uses their truck as as a daily drive or family vehicle in the city.
This is one more area where there is no one right way to get the job done .
As long as it is safely done that is the main thing and I have not seen the Median strip full of wrecked Tundras (or other 1/2 ton trucks) and 34 foot trailers.
If it works for you and doesn't endanger me that is good enough.
The thread seems to be becoming some what heated and personal and maybe we should all take a deep breath.
__________________
Rick Davis 1602 K8DOC
61 tradewind, plus a few others
13 Ram 2500 TD
99 Dodge TD 577K miles

RickDavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 05:03 PM   #76
Rivet Master
 
Moflash's Avatar
 
2007 28' International CCD
Springfield , Missouri
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanologist View Post
OMG! Trading every 3 years!! That's real COSTLY "ownership" -- essentially giving new vehicles away. Yes, To each his own. I'm SURE Ford investors just love that concept. Upside- down on every trade-in.
My last trade in depreciation was $6100 for 2.5 years usage and 39000 miles.Plus the tax write offs for business usage .But I take meticulous care of my vehicles,I get the right options and color combinations for resale.
My trade in trucks are cleaner then the new ones I purchase.

I like people who think the way you do though as most when it comes time buy a different vehicle they never look at new ones so they end up paying more for a clean used one (and do not catch on).
And by the way I have never been upside down in a trade in.
Just sayin!!
Moflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 06:25 PM   #77
Rivet Master
 
andreasduess's Avatar
 
1984 34' International
Toronto , Ontario
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,499
Images: 5
Blog Entries: 1
I just got introduced to the very best way to buy a car - a personal broker.

We wanted to buy a van for our business, specifically a Grand Caravan with Stow and Go seating. We briefed the broker, she came back with three different options, we chose one and today we picked up a 2012 GC at the dealership with less than 25k on the clock for 8k less than new. All the paperwork was ready and waiting for us, everything was prepared.

The woman offering the broker services used to be a fleet buyer before starting her own business. The dealers love her because she knows the rules, knows the profit margins, knows what deal she can reasonably demand and, most importantly, she moves a lot of cars. As a result, she gets deals that are almost impossible to secure for the average car buyer without doing a lot of research.

This was a business purchase, but I'll be buying all my cars with her from now on. The entire buying process took about 30 minutes of my time and I believe we got an excellent deal.
andreasduess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 07:25 PM   #78
Rivet Master
 
RickDavis's Avatar
 
1961 24' Tradewind
1969 29' Ambassador
1970 21' Globetrotter
Jamestown , Tennessee
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,783
The way we buy is changing.
I found my 13 Dodge Cummins on the internet at what I felt was the right price. After a couple e mails and phone calls it was delivered to my driveway. Very little time invested. Never had to set foot on a dealer lot.
__________________
Rick Davis 1602 K8DOC
61 tradewind, plus a few others
13 Ram 2500 TD
99 Dodge TD 577K miles

RickDavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 07:33 AM   #79
Rivet Master
 
m.hony's Avatar
 
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 12,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moflash View Post
If you trade every 3 years or so a F350 or F250 Turbo diesel cost of ownership is about the same as a 1/2 ton(depreciation and upkeep) There is no diesel smell Oil changes are $89 at the Ford dealership When driving a diesel the new ones are as quiet as a gas engine I drive mine like a car everyday it rides great. I can take things with me without any worry of going over my payload capacity.A 8 foot box with a crew cab is not available in a 1/2 ton. I can take a Harley or a 2up 4wheeler with me (those little 5.5 or 6.5 boxes don't do it for me) With 400 horsepower and 800foot lbs of torque I get 20-22 mpg Hwy and 13-16mpg stop and go city. I have had many 1/2 tons including Toyotas,Fords,Chevys but for what I do when traveling with my Airstream I will never go back to a 1/2 ton. As you say to each his own.
I don't trade- ever-
I buy one and keep it as long as I can.
If you keep one for 15 years or more the diesel is much more expensive to own.
Tundra oil changes are $29 at the dealer-
Fuel is at least 30 cents less per gallon.
I do like the idea of an 8' bed, though.
No need to have an 8' bed on a half ton- you would be overloaded if you used it for a nearly 800# Harley and hitched to an Airstream.
I could, however, (and I might) put a Honda 250 dirt bike or a Vespa in my squatty bed pickup.
__________________
2013 Classic 30 Limited
2007 Silver Toyota Tundra Crew Max Limited 5.7 iForce
2006 Vivid Black Harley-Davidson Road King Classic
1999 Black Nissan Pathfinder LE
TAC #MS-10
WBCCI #1811, Region 6, Unit 56
Airforums #70955
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 08:01 AM   #80
Rivet Master
 
TG Twinkie's Avatar
 
1974 Argosy 26
Morrill , Nebraska
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,014
Images: 2
Blog Entries: 5
I moved up from a '98 Dodge 2500 to an '08 Tundra just about 9 months ago and have never looked back.
Over all the Tundra gets 5 mpg better mileage and the additional 120HP makes a world of difference.
I lucked out because the Tundra only had 9,000, yes 9,000 miles on it.
I would have liked the 8' box, but for the price and mileage on this Double Cab model, I was willing to sacrifice and get the 6.5' box.
I am amazed at the technological changes that have been made in a 10 year period. The improved handling, increase in both HP and mileage, along with the cab comfort.
I am sure the changes have taken place in the American trucks as well.
I have owned 3 new trucks in my life. A '76 an '85 and even though the Tundra is an '08, I consider it new with only 9K miles. All of the trucks are Toyota. I still have the '85, it is approaching 300K miles and still runs great.
As a daily driver and TV this truck has the best of both worlds for me.
On a trip to Canada this year I found that the mileage improved by a consistent 2 mpg once I was north of the 49th parallel. No ethanol in the gas north of the border.
TG Twinkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.