We have just upgraged from our '98 2500 Sub with the 454 engine, 4.10 rear & 10,000 lb touring pacing to a very low mileage, '03 Yukon XL's with the 8.1L (496 cubic inches), again with the 4:10 posi-traction rear & 10K trailer tow package -- both 4X4.
The 454 had PLENTY of hp / torque to pull our '07 25' Safari FB but after 175K+ miles it was time to move on.
After investigation, we choose not to go new since the biggest block now availabe is the 6L -- which someone correctly commented gets its HP and torgue much higher int he RPM range.
As they say, "there is no substitution for cubic inches". The 8.1L engine has both in spades!
Regards,
TKNELLE
|