Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-22-2006, 09:01 AM   #15
Rivet Master
redeagle313's Avatar
Currently Looking...
NE , Indiana
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 617
Images: 7
Originally Posted by Druupy
I did read that article about 1 ton trucks.
Wasn't it titled "How can we make the chev look best?"

I don't agree with their conclusions.
In the Edmunds test, they ran all 3 pickups through the same tests and the Chevrolet dually did better than the they said it was the winner and you don't agree..... Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up?

Hi Yo Silver, Away II?
looking for our next AS
AIR 7185
redeagle313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 09:36 AM   #16
Rivet Master
Fyrzowt's Avatar
2000 25' Safari
West of Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,697
Images: 8
A few months ago I was in the market for a used PU. In talking to several used truck dealers, I posed the GM/Ford/Dodge question. Every one of them said they would all do the job, but in terms of quality and resale they would rate them in the order I did above. GM - Ford - Dodge.

Fyrzowt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 01:32 PM   #17
4 Rivet Member
2007 25' International CCD
Arlington , Virginia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 323
Images: 5
Wow! Thanks all. You all have given me much to chew on before I blow "Big Jack" on a truck not likely to have alot of miles put on it.
Streamer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 11:34 PM   #18
Rivet Master

2005 25' Safari
Salem , Oregon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,377
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 55
Originally Posted by redeagle313
If you really have to have a dually, look at, they did a recent test of the three dualies and they said the GM pickup was the hands down winner. Here is the link to the article.
Hi, I also don't agree with this test. They said they loaded them all with 81% of their maximum load, but did not say how much the load for each was. Which one carried the most weight? Why not try all of them with the same load or with a 34' Airstream. All three towing the same trailer. Why did the Dodge have to have the Mega Cab and why did the Ford have to have the King Ranch option? Was this purposely done to make the Chevy cheaper, therefore look better.

ROBERTSUNRUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 01:23 AM   #19
Rivet Master
2007 25' Safari FB SE
Suburbia , Sunny So Cal
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,761
Duallies won't fit in the carwash. Two extra tires to buy. Wider turning radius.
Stiffer ride for the A/S. Lower mileage. You sure about this?
I'd rather be boon docking in the desert.

AIR# 13896
CA 4
Goin camping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 01:47 AM   #20
klattu's Avatar
1972 Argosy 24
1989 34.5' Airstream 345
Heart of Dixie , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,650
Images: 834
Dual rears because of the potential of a flat?
Dang...a rear flat is wet dream compared to a front...
When a front going out, you may still get wet from the uncontrolable excitement.
You may even talk to God.

No need for a dually just for tires.
3/4 T is great, and has same brakes a 1 T.

klattu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 03:00 AM   #21
Rivet Monster
wahoonc's Avatar

1975 31' Sovereign
1980 31' Excella II
Sprung Leak , North Carolina
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,174
Images: 40
You can also get a 1 ton rating in the single rear wheel configuration. And is some cases it is actually rated to tow a bit more weight

__________________ many little time...
Why are we in this basket...and where are we going
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 05:38 AM   #22
Posts: n/a
Ford went to a larger displacement diesel engine because of new emmission regulations not because of problems with the 6.0. There were problems early in the life of the engine but by the time regulations had changed these had pretty much been ironed out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 05:46 AM   #23
Silver Mist
LI Pets's Avatar
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Wouldn't it be easier to redesign for emmission regulations then design & build a new engine?

The 7.3 was built by International, wasn't the 6.0 built by Ford?

I thought the new 6.4 is again built by International, not sure?
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 07:07 AM   #24
4 Rivet Member
1972 21' Globetrotter
nc , North Carolina
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 253
Images: 2
just get a dodge, get her done.
rock60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 07:59 AM   #25
4 Rivet Member
startrekker2001's Avatar
1978 31' Excella 500
Palm Bay , Florida
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 268
Images: 34


I am not quite sure why you would want all that heavy springing for a 25' trailer, or for a 34'r for that matter.

One of the big cons against having too much heavy rear springing is the fact that it will beat your trailer to death, literally. Your hitch and thus the front of the trailer will have a very rough ride because there will be practically no give in the rear suspension. Therefore, when going over rough roads or poorly designed bridge transitions, you will be SLAMMING the front of the trailer up and down, instead of a more cushioned ride. This will have a severe effect on the frame and the internals of the trailer. Just as too little spring can be dangerous, too much can be destructive. Somewhere in this forum is a discussion on this very subject.

Seriously consider a 3/4 ton diesel picking up truck or comparable SUV. You will be much happier with the ride especially sans trailer.
Vic Smith
Director Florida State Rally
WBCCI Florida Unit 027 Trustee
WBCCI #6782
31' 78 Airstream Excella 500
2001 Ford Excursion V-10
Reese hitch and dual cam sway control
startrekker2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 08:16 AM   #26
4 Rivet Member
2007 25' International CCD
Arlington , Virginia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 323
Images: 5
After a moment of "hysteria," and being "slapped silly" by colleagues for my "moment of weakness," I think I can safely rule out any further thoughts of acquiring a dually. 3/4 ton though sounds like it may make more sense for me.

Streamer1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.