Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-26-2015, 04:24 PM   #21
Always learning
 
Lance M's Avatar
 
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central , Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
Images: 24
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to Lance M
Just in case y'all forgot what the OP asked-
"I'd enjoy reading everyone's idea/opinions about which of these two vehicles or another one that we haven't discovered yet is the way to go."

Ideas and opinions about which of these two vehicles, or another one that we haven't discovered yet, is the way to go.

So, instead of talking smack about the truck you don't recommend, how about talking up the truck you do recommend?
__________________
Lance

Work is never done, so take time to play!
Lance M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 04:37 PM   #22
Rivet Master
 
switz's Avatar

 
2014 31' Classic
2015 23' International
2013 25' FB International
Apache Junction , Arizona
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,223
Images: 9
The OP did not mention family size, pets or other load variables to give a clue to the non trailer weight that must also be considered for the 23 series. Our 23D had about a 1,239 payload before propane and fresh water and water in the water heater on the dealer lot. Those three items use around 416 pounds of the payload so the net railer payload is around 823 pounds before any modifications.

The 720 pound tongue weight was closer to 850 pounds with the hitch installed and full tanks.

So the trade off between the Ram and the Ford is one gets better mileage but with a lower payload. The tow vehicle payload could most likely control the selection when all the weight variables are considered.
__________________
WBCCI Life Member 5123, AIR 70341, 4CU, WD9EMC

TV - 2012 Dodge 2500 4x4 Cummins HO, automatic, Centramatics, Kelderman level ride airbag suspension, bed shell

2014 31' Classic w/ twin beds, 50 amp service, 1000 watt solar system, Centramatics, Tuson TPMS, 12" disc brakes, 16" tires & wheels
switz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 04:54 PM   #23
Always learning
 
Lance M's Avatar
 
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central , Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
Images: 24
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to Lance M
Quote:
Originally Posted by switz View Post
The OP did not mention family size, pets or other load variables to give a clue to the non trailer weight that must also be considered for the 23 series. Our 23D had about a 1,239 payload before propane and fresh water and water in the water heater on the dealer lot. Those three items use around 416 pounds of the payload so the net railer payload is around 823 pounds before any modifications.

The 720 pound tongue weight was closer to 850 pounds with the hitch installed and full tanks.

So the trade off between the Ram and the Ford is one gets better mileage but with a lower payload. The tow vehicle payload could most likely control the selection when all the weight variables are considered.
All truths.

My comment above is mostly directed towards the guys who drive a Ford and only have negative things to say about the RAM and the RAM guys who only have negative things to say about the Ford.

You know, this is much like a political discussion. Tell me how great your candidate is, not how bad mine is.
__________________
Lance

Work is never done, so take time to play!
Lance M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 05:15 PM   #24
Rivet Master
 
ROBERTSUNRUS's Avatar

 
2005 25' Safari
Salem , Oregon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,377
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 55
Check the payload.

Hi, I have Ford in my blood so naturally I bought a Ford Ecoboost and couldn't be happier. You would be happy with either one, Ford or Dodge, but the main thing you need to look for is the yellow payload sticker in the door jamb. Some versions of both of these trucks have a pitifully low payload.

Note: do not go by the payload specs in the sales brochure, Only the yellow sticker on the actual truck matters.
__________________
Bob 2005 Safari 25-B
"Le Petit Chateau Argent" Small Silver Castle
2000 Navigator / 2014 F-150 Eco-Boost / Equal-i-zer / P-3
YAMAHA 2400 / AIR #12144
ROBERTSUNRUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 05:17 PM   #25
Rivet Master
 
tjdonahoe's Avatar
 
2013 31' Classic
billings , Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
If it were me I would go with the dodge, I sure like my 6.7 in the 2500...
tjdonahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 05:32 PM   #26
Rivet Master
 
tjdonahoe's Avatar
 
2013 31' Classic
billings , Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by pappy19 View Post
What is doesn't say is the extra cost to own a diesel engine; more maintenance costs and if you live in the north country, a much different winter expense than a gas rig. The towing ability in the mountains is way ahead on the F-150 over the Eco-diesel Ram, not even close. I'd givce the Ram Eco-diesel a couple of years to see if it chokes before I'd put out the extra money for one.
You should check out VM Motori , they have been building engines since 1947, so this engine is nothing new, it is also being used in some Cadillac 's and all over the world, empty they are saying 27mpg........
tjdonahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 06:35 PM   #27
3 Rivet Member
 
Seattle , USA
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 199


Hmmm...needs more grilles and openings and creases and squares and plastic chrome...
RareStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2015, 08:49 PM   #28
Moderator
 
DKB_SATX's Avatar

 
2017 26' Flying Cloud
Alamo Heights , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,534
Images: 1
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by RareStream View Post


Hmmm...needs more grilles and openings and creases and squares and plastic chrome...
The OP didn't list aethetics as something about which he needed help.
__________________
— David

Zero Gravitas — 2017 Flying Cloud 26U | WBCCI# 15566

He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. — Sir Winston Churchill
DKB_SATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2015, 05:17 PM   #29
Rivet Master
 
rodsterinfl's Avatar

 
2006 25' Safari
St. Augustine , Florida
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,670
Images: 10
Alright, to be fair in this analysis I will mention some of my notes and findings when I shopped. The picture of the F150 is a Platinum model, the different trim lines have different grilles. I shopped so carefully I know the trim levels by the grilles. XLT has brackets, Lariat has lines, King Ranch bronze insert, Platinum satin finish chrome. You cannot really pick something like that being critical as there are so many options.

I will say this about aesthetics, I look around as a picky person at rubber trim, edges, etc. I noticed big differences. The Ford had quality rubber trim around the doors and it was attached at points and looked like a single piece. Three of the Rams I looked at had rubber pieces that were not attached with openings and the "weld" spots on the rubber were rough and unfinished. While the interior of the Laramie was nice, the other two were not so great. Understand too that this observation was not just for the diesel model. The Laramie was a diesel, while the other two were hemi models. I know this is subjective but rubber sticking out along the doors bothers me. I know that final judgement of such things is personal but with the previous posts I had to speak up.

With the rebates, etc, I find that there is little difference in the trucks. My MSRP sticker was scary high, much higher than the RAMS I looked at though the Diesel Laramie was about the same after discounts were considered. In this you have to just pick the one you would like. All things considered, I voted for the F150 over the big RAM. I was told for my load I would be best getting the 3.92 axle 5.7 liter hemi. Now, when comparing that to the Ford I was looking at 13mpg city versus 17mpg EPA figures. As far as my personal aesthetics go, I liked the look of the RAM and the Ford but I found the fit and finish of the Tundra and Ford most the same, followed by Chevy and then RAM. Any who, pick one.
__________________
WBCCI 8653/AIR 60240
2022 Ford F150 PowerBoost Platinum w/7.2KW
rodsterinfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2015, 07:14 PM   #30
2 Rivet Member
 
2015 28' Flying Cloud
Melbourne Beach , Florida
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Tow Weight

I have had 4 Airstreams, each bigger than the one before. The ECO Diesel has a lower towing capacity so if you decide to buy a 28' in the future you would be at the limit of the diesel.
Kingsmen 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 09:34 AM   #31
Rivet Master
 
KJRitchie's Avatar
 
2008 25' Classic
Full Time , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,309
Payload of the Ram 1500 Ecodiesel is the reason I crossed it off my list. I eventually went with a Ram 2500 CC CTD 4x4. I only got the Big Horn version and its payload is only 2089 but I was coming from a Tundra DC 2x4 with only 1465lbs. I considered an F150 but none of them around me had the combination of the trailer tow mirrors, the extended tank and 6' bed, which for me was a deal breaker. There are pros and cons about all these trucks. You just have to figure out what is important and hopefully you make the right decision.

Kelvin
__________________
2008 Classic 25fb "Silver Mistress"
2015 Ram 2500 6.7L Cummins. Crew Cab, 4x4, Silver
KJRitchie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 11:16 AM   #32
4 Rivet Member
 
2015 27' Flying Cloud
Bozman , Maryland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 294
I'd go with the F150. In a crew cab at the higher trim levels, the Ram is just short on payload. The reliability of this Diesel engine in this service is unknown and, frankly, even empty, it's down on power. The Ecoboost engine has been in service in both trucks and cars since 2011 and, after some initial problems with the inter cooler has established a good reputation. It has a flat, diesel-like torque curve, which makes it great for towing. It is easy to get over-excited about fuel economy numbers until you "do the math" and see how many $$ you're saving per year, after accounting for the price difference of the fuels.
DC Bruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 07:06 AM   #33
Rivet Master
 
tjdonahoe's Avatar
 
2013 31' Classic
billings , Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
You best check the price' s of the fuels, diesel has gone way down some places it is cheaper than reg gas....
tjdonahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 08:16 AM   #34
Rivet Master
 
KJRitchie's Avatar
 
2008 25' Classic
Full Time , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,309
Traditionally, diesel has been more expensive and you should factor in the worse case scenario like last winter when diesel was $1/g higher. If you intend to use it as a daily driver that can hurt. My Ram 2500 CTD is a mostly a driveway queen. Bought it now for future extensive travels out west and to pay it off while still working before I switch to Social Security.

Kelvin
__________________
2008 Classic 25fb "Silver Mistress"
2015 Ram 2500 6.7L Cummins. Crew Cab, 4x4, Silver
KJRitchie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2015, 08:02 AM   #35
Rivet Master
 
switz's Avatar

 
2014 31' Classic
2015 23' International
2013 25' FB International
Apache Junction , Arizona
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,223
Images: 9
When I was a kid, diesel was about half the cost of gasoline. I still remember $0.08 per gallon gas with a windshield clean and check the oil. $2.00 filled a tank.....
__________________
WBCCI Life Member 5123, AIR 70341, 4CU, WD9EMC

TV - 2012 Dodge 2500 4x4 Cummins HO, automatic, Centramatics, Kelderman level ride airbag suspension, bed shell

2014 31' Classic w/ twin beds, 50 amp service, 1000 watt solar system, Centramatics, Tuson TPMS, 12" disc brakes, 16" tires & wheels
switz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2015, 09:14 AM   #36
Rivet Master
 
tjdonahoe's Avatar
 
2013 31' Classic
billings , Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
In most areas the diesel is cheaper than gas and still going down matching the crude oil prices.In other posts the ecoboast ford is traded off as it didn't do what the new owner expected while towing his as. Diesel still produces the best power, you don't any of the big gas trucks on the road like you used to, they weren't cost effective...
tjdonahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2015, 09:52 AM   #37
Moderator
 
DKB_SATX's Avatar

 
2017 26' Flying Cloud
Alamo Heights , Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,534
Images: 1
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjdonahoe View Post
In most areas the diesel is cheaper than gas and still going down matching the crude oil prices.In other posts the ecoboast ford is traded off as it didn't do what the new owner expected while towing his as. Diesel still produces the best power, you don't any of the big gas trucks on the road like you used to, they weren't cost effective...
Let's not assume facts in evidence while trying to present only one side of the argument. While the Ecoboost and other capable half-tons are not all things to all people, neither are HD diesel pickups. The Ecoboost serves many Airstreamers quite well whom I know personally and camp with regularly, towing Airstreams from tiny to large in flatlands and mountains.
__________________
— David

Zero Gravitas — 2017 Flying Cloud 26U | WBCCI# 15566

He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. — Sir Winston Churchill
DKB_SATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2015, 09:33 PM   #38
2 Rivet Member
 
Oak Harbor , wa
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 76
Love our Ecodiesel

OK, lots of talk, but how does it work. Our 2015 ecodiesel has 3.92 axle ratio, gets 27-29 empty on hwy, 22-23 around town. Pulling our 25' fc it is perfect. Using the tow/haul mode it gets 15-17 on the highway, drops to 13-15 in the mountains. We live in Western Wash and do lots of mountain driving over the Cascades and south over Siskius of Ore/Cal. Could not be happier.
I have been a marine diesel mechanic for 30 years and am very picky about engine design and performance. Ecodiesel works very well with 25' AS. M
Measure the tongue weight, transfer weight as reqd, set up your WD hitch properly. Then all is good!
Stormalong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2015, 09:47 PM   #39
Rivet Master
 
kscherzi's Avatar
 
2013 27' FB International
El Dorado Hills , California
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,023
Images: 24
If you had F250 diesel you could do 85 uphill. In many respects speed is the difference.
kscherzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2015, 08:07 AM   #40
Rivet Master
 
tjdonahoe's Avatar
 
2013 31' Classic
billings , Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
I do believe that ecodiesel will be a winner.
tjdonahoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1500


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2014 RAM 1500 EcoDIESEL has arrived! Lance M Tow Vehicles 173 10-23-2018 07:35 PM
RAM 1500 EcoDiesel TV and Argosy 26 Report BentMetal All Argosy Trailers 21 04-09-2015 10:51 PM
Dodge Ram 1500 Ecodiesel dlarsen Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches 3 07-10-2014 08:24 PM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.