 |
|
11-29-2011, 03:48 PM
|
#1
|
Rivet Master 
Commercial Member
Currently Looking...
Marco Island, FL
, Hood River, OR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,761
|
New Atwood Tankless
Water Heater.
Just got this notice. Atwood has introduced 2 new tankless, on-demand water heaters that are a direct replacement for just about any existing Atwood LP or LP/electric water heater.
Two new models; OD-45 that runs at 16-45,000 BTU and the larger OD-50 that runs from 16-50,000 BTU on LP gas.
Dimensions are 12.5" high X 12.5" wide X 16" deep with both weighing 30 lbs.
Retail pricing is $949 and 999 respectively.
From what I have seen in the press release, they look like quality built units and both operate with high BTU outputs to effectively heat your water.
I'll let you know more when I get a call to install one of these..........
__________________
Lew Farber - RVIA Nationally Certified Master Tech.... MASTER TECH RV SYSTEMS, INC.
AM SOLAR SALES & INSTALLATIONS ..... MAGNUM INVERTERS.....LIFELINE BATTERIES
NO MORE AIRSTREAM.... NO MORE MEMBERSHIPS.... BUT I'M STILL AROUND!
|
|
|
11-29-2011, 03:52 PM
|
#2
|
Rivet Master 

1983 34' Excella
1967 24' Tradewind
Little Rock
, Arkansas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,173
|
Thanks Lew,
They look competitively priced. Do you know anything about options like wind and/or cold weather kits like those for PrecisionTemp?
__________________
Vaughan
|
|
|
11-29-2011, 06:32 PM
|
#3
|
Rivet Master 
Commercial Member
Currently Looking...
Marco Island, FL
, Hood River, OR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,761
|
I'm not sure they are required, as they are not used in the standard Atwood heaters. I'll find out about them next time I speak to Atwood tech support.
__________________
Lew Farber - RVIA Nationally Certified Master Tech.... MASTER TECH RV SYSTEMS, INC.
AM SOLAR SALES & INSTALLATIONS ..... MAGNUM INVERTERS.....LIFELINE BATTERIES
NO MORE AIRSTREAM.... NO MORE MEMBERSHIPS.... BUT I'M STILL AROUND!
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 10:28 AM
|
#4
|
2 Rivet Member 
1978 31' Sovereign
Murfreesboro
, Tennessee
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 20
|
Have you found out anything new about the tankless Atwood??
__________________
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 02:18 PM
|
#5
|
Rivet Master 
1967 28' Ambassador
1963 19' Globetrotter
1970 29' Ambassador
Waukesha
, Wisconsin
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,160
|
Doing a little googling, I ran into one dealer doing a "Pre-sale" - They are selling the smaller unit for $740 including shipping ($780 for the big one)
Also, it just occurred to me that using a tankless water heater would eliminate the need for any of the winter by-pass kit hoo-ha. On the other hand, all that circuit board electronics does leave you high and dry if it gets fried... been there, done that.
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 02:28 PM
|
#6
|
|
"CLOUDSPLITTER" (tahawus)

2003 25' Classic
Hoover Beach
, "Niagara Frontier" NY
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
|
I tank I'll let someone else test 'em  ...keep us posted Lew.
Bob
__________________
LOST IN THE SIXTIES
" I'll know where I am when I get there"
Bob,Sandra & "Fado"
 2006 3/4 Burb 8.1
Hensley
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 03:43 PM
|
#7
|
Rivet Master 
2006 28' Safari SE
1981 28' Airstream 280
Phoenix
, Arizona
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 694
|
I like this a lot
If they weigh in a 30lbs, but you don't actually have 6 gallons of water to haul around in the tank, is this actually a weight reduction too? And I also have concerns with all the circuitry having had an Atwood board (and other electronic components) go bad before. I like this option better than earlier products. It looks plug and play.
-Ken
__________________
4CU Charter Member
1981 Excella 280 Turbo Diesel Motorhome
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 03:58 PM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Commercial Member
1967 30' Sovereign
Angel Fire
, New Mexico
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,094
|
I was kind of wondering the same thing. Checked the specs on a Suburban 6 Gallon LP/DSI (i.e., regular water heater), and it came in at 33 lbs. (The six gallons of water adds about 50 lbs.) My suspicion is that the tankless will save a good deal of weight.

Lynn
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverback
If they weigh in a 30lbs, but you don't actually have 6 gallons of water to haul around in the tank, is this actually a weight reduction too? And I also have concerns with all the circuitry having had an Atwood board (and other electronic components) go bad before. I like this option better than earlier products. It looks plug and play.
-Ken
|
__________________
WBCCI 21043
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 04:25 PM
|
#9
|
2 Rivet Member 
1977 31' Sovereign
San Francisco
, California
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 26
|
I've got the Atwood tankless on order since I needed a replacement anyway... supposed to ship Feb 29th. Will let y'all know how it looks.
__________________
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 09:33 AM
|
#10
|
Rivet Master 
2006 28' Safari SE
1981 28' Airstream 280
Phoenix
, Arizona
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 694
|
Another question...
When boon-docking/dry camping, does the tank-less water heater use more battery then the traditional water heater? I'd like to see that part of the spec sheet. I'm sure it uses less propane then a system turning itself on/off all day but does it also use less or more electrons?
__________________
4CU Charter Member
1981 Excella 280 Turbo Diesel Motorhome
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 11:06 AM
|
#11
|
4 Rivet Member 
2006 22' International CCD
2007 Base Camp
Quesnel
, British Columbia
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverback
When boon-docking/dry camping, does the tank-less water heater use more battery then the traditional water heater? I'd like to see that part of the spec sheet. I'm sure it uses less propane then a system turning itself on/off all day but does it also use less or more electrons?
|
If it is running on gas, then no... as it requires the same water pump to run that would draw water from a hot water tank. If it has an electric mode, then yes... as the current needed to heat water 'instantly' is a lot more than an electric probe taking an hour to heat 6 gallons of water. However, if you look at the total electrical consumption, the on-demnd would use less, as it only heats when needed. The difference is the peak load.
I only am familiar with home on-demand systems, and many of those still use a pilot light for NG systems... so they are not as efficient as electronic ignition models. If the Atwood is an electronic ignition then there isn't that issue.
It's hard to say what will use less propane... if the on-demand system is not efficiently packaged, you could end up using more... though I suspect the whole point was to come up with a more efficient system. Really, the end result is exactly the same - x number of gallons heated requires the same input. It is the waste and efficiency that matters.
__________________
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 11:37 AM
|
#12
|
Rivet Master 

1978 29' Ambassador
Morada
, California
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,410
|
Having used tankless type water heaters in our home (and boat) for many years, the fuel savings can be significant over time...
Our current model has an electronic ignition - previous models used a small pilot light that was lit all the time...
Our only real problems with our older model was with the temperature/thermostat - had to replace it several times...
With regard to tankless use in your AS - you'll still have to winterize the unit by draining the water - Tankless water heaters are essentially a 'radiator' (actually a heat exchanger) that have a gas burner below to provide the 'heat' as it travels upward through the fins or tubing of the 'radiator/HE' to heat the water when water flow is detected...The 'radiator/HE' is full of water any time your water system is pressurized by the water pump, and would freeze to damage the unit if exposed to harsh winter conditions...
With regard to freezing weather...I wonder if these RV units have a thermistor to fire them off for a short period if the temp drops below freezing during normal use, if the 'radiator/HE' is exposed to the outside air via the vent system???
__________________
Ray & Pat near Lodi, CA
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 12:55 PM
|
#13
|
|
touched
Commercial Member

1962 26' Overlander
1948 22' Liner
Vintage Kin Owner
Currently Looking...
Catonsville
, Maryland
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,383
|
I believe that Atwood now owns Precession Temp. I might be wrong about that. I do know they now own Fantastic Vent. I have been installing a few PT units lately and I too am sold on them. Fred, from PT told me of a new unit coming out that will vent through the floor. Is there any connection to these new Atwood units?
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 01:48 PM
|
#14
|
Rivet Master 

1975 Argosy 24
Fort Worth
, Texas
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,576
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62overlander
I believe that Atwood now owns Precession Temp. I might be wrong about that. I do know they now own Fantastic Vent. I have been installing a few PT units lately and I too am sold on them. Fred, from PT told me of a new unit coming out that will vent through the floor. Is there any connection to these new Atwood units?
|
Vent through the floor, so it requires some sort of fan in operation? Or is it pulling combustion air up from a port in the floor with an exhaust up higher?
__________________
Il Carriaggio -- 1975 Argosy 24
2007 F150 Lariat Supercrew 5.4
AIR# 15566 | WBCCI# 15566
He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.
-- Sir Winston Churchill
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|


Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|