Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-15-2016, 08:09 AM   #1
3 Rivet Member
2016 28' Flying Cloud
Queensbury , New York
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 127
Have you gone from class B or C MOHO to an Airstream TT

I Never have owned a Class B or C MOHO . I do have an Airstream TT.
Maybe I will move to a MOHO , B or C .

Looking for owners who went from the B or C MoHo to the TT and why you made the switch.

MOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2016, 11:36 AM   #2
3 Rivet Member
2016 28' Flying Cloud
Queensbury , New York
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 127
This maybe the wrong place to post this . I do not know how or where to move it to .

MOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2016, 11:42 AM   #3
Rivet Master
Hittenstiehl's Avatar
1961 28' Ambassador
1961 19' Globetrotter
Mesa , Arizona
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,193
Images: 9
It's not a bad spot or a bad title. Some threads just get more attention than others. Someone will answer.

Hittenstiehl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2016, 01:24 PM   #4
4 Rivet Member
Alluminati's Avatar
Vintage Kin Owner
St. Louis , Missouri
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 411
Images: 3
Years ago we briefly owned a 24' class C. When looking to return to RVing, wife was adamant that we get a TT, not another MH. She wants to drop our trailer at destination and explore with our TV. She rehearses the time we went to see family, and had to rely on others to shuttle us around. Also insurance on a MH is higher than on a TT. And it's not good for the engineworks of a MH to sit idle between trips.

There are pros and cons to both modes, and I happen to prefer a MH, but I also prefer to keep my wife happy, so I'm agreeing to side with her.
The Morgans
1989 Avion 34VB, "QE3"
2008 Toyota Sequoia 5.7L "Tug"
(Is there no respect for an 8-ton GCVWR truck? *sniff* )
Alluminati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 11:49 AM   #5
2 Rivet Member
Paul and Tam's Avatar
1988 34.5' Airstream 345
Ham Lake , Minnesota
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 60
We have considered changing to a trailer, but for now we are keeping the 345.

Trailer advantages: No need for a towed vehicle to explore the area around the camp ground. The tow vehicle will likely be a daily driver, eliminating one engine/drive train to maintain.

Disadvantages: More frequent stops since passengers cannot use the rest room while in motion. Less comfortable ride since passengers cannot move around while traveling.
Paul and Tam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 12:40 PM   #6
2 Rivet Member
1992 29' Excella
1972 27' Overlander
Wakefield , Rhode Island
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 59
We owned a MiniWinnie class C for a couple of years. The main reason we went to a TT was the inconvenience of having to unhook everything (sewer, water, electric) whenever we wanted to go anywhere once we'd reached our destination. Couple that with the hassles of parking a MoHo in a city or in some small towns and we quickly saw the advantages of a TT plus TV. If we were ever to do another MoHo in the future, which is highly, highly unlikely, we'd have a toad for the convenience of getting around.
msimon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 01:25 PM   #7
2 Rivet Member
Louie De's Avatar
2000 34' Excella
Currently Looking...
Goodyear , and Denver, Colorado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Over the past 35 years I have gone back & forth between a MH & TT 4 times for various reasons. The difference between both can be felt primarily in the pocketbook. A MH costs much more to operate & depreciates faster than A TT. However, in my opinion, a MH is more convenient. 1. can use bathroom both while in motion & without exiting, 2.levels much faster with limited effort, 3. refer available in motion, BUT, 4 Service can be a hassle compared to a TT. 5. Many steps to get into a MH compared to most TT. 6. Many MH have gone out of business when compared to A/S making parts hard to find (example -windshields), 7. Indoor Storage requires taller heights, 8.Dingy connections can cost $3,000 or more, 9. Larger / longer MH are restricted in some states from traveling on roadways, 10. MPG is usually lower on MH & the list goes on.
Hope this helps a bit.
Louie De is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 01:33 PM   #8
Rivet Master
m.hony's Avatar
2013 30' Classic
Greenwood , Mississippi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 12,109
The Class B will have less room than your trailer.
The Class C will have more room, but will suffer on quality and style unless it is a Lazy Daze or Leisure Travel Vans.
2013 Classic 30 Limited
2007 Silver Toyota Tundra Crew Max Limited 5.7 iForce
2006 Vivid Black Harley-Davidson Road King Classic
1999 Black Nissan Pathfinder LE
TAC #MS-10
WBCCI #1811, Region 6, Unit 56
Airforums #70955
m.hony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 01:33 PM   #9
Rivet Master
RamblinManGa's Avatar

2016 28' Pendleton
Currently Looking...
Scottsdale , Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 840
Images: 2
Hi from AZ. . . in my previous life I had a small class C MH & then traded it on a tt. . . I prefer the ability to un-hook & then go around the area for fun or supplies,etc. I guess the MH with a toad might give a similar experience, but my TV is also daily driver, & it works for me. We did like that Serro Scotty MH tho. . .. . . to each his/her own I guess, ........regards, Craig
WBCCI 2851,4CU
RamblinManGa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 01:55 PM   #10
4 Rivet Member
2011 30' Flying Cloud
Greenback , Tennessee
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 268
I once owned a small Class C and spent a lot of time working on it. We only had the opportunity to use it in the summer, so it sat unused for 10-11 months. Not good! We enjoyed it more than the pop-up we had previously and had lots of adventures as a young family. The lack of a toad (towed vehicle) was also a limiting factor. As someone else mentioned, we had to unhook everything to go to town. At that time, though, we mostly boondocked or stayed in Forest Service campgrounds and we didn't have much money, so we didn't go to town very often anyway ;-)

I have found I spend much less in up-keep on a trailer and I have now owned four different ones.
Gneiss Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 03:49 PM   #11
1 Rivet Member
1976 Argosy 28
London , Ontario
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 11
Hi. We started with a 37 ft SOB 1991 park model. Went to a 24 ft C Class and this summer moved to a 28 c/b '76 Arogsy. Issues for us with C class. Just a bit too small for us. And when traveling always felt need for 2nd vehicle. Otherwise it was great. Having an airstream / argosy was a dream of ours and we like it much better so far.
Tree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 06:20 PM   #12
3 Rivet Member
The Ice Man's Avatar
2011 27 FB International
Tucson , Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 204
We're among those that went from various MHs to a TT. Most recently, we went from a 37 ft. Patriot to a 27 ft AS. Patriot more than 2X, almost 3X, as expensive. Maintenance several times as expensive as the TT and TV combined. A MH depreciates like a lead weight, straight down. (On the other hand you can buy a 10 YO Country Coach in premo condition for less than the price of a Bambi.)

A whole lot of places you simply can't go in a MH, or when you get there camping locations are way limited -- think National Parks, state parks and BLM/Forest Service locations... Oh, did I mention cross-winds? I can't tell you the number of times we simply pulled off the road to wait for the wind to stop -- almost a full day once between Las Vegas, NM and Raton. The AS is completely unfazed by the wind, even in Wyoming.

The living space was pretty much the same in the 37 as the 27 AS - about the only difference is that you go to your truck bed for your gear rather than the Bays in the MH. (We have an 8' bed with a shell and bed slide) GenSet resides in the Truck and has to be hooked up while in the MH it was a simple push of a button. Toward the end of her life, our 100 lb German Shepherd had trouble negotiating the the steps to get into the MH. Ever tried to carry a wet Shepherd up the 5 steps to get out of the rain?

It makes no sense to have a MH if you don't pull a toad - we pulled a Jeep Grand Cherokee. So now you're well over 3X the cost of a TV & TT. Otherwise you're stuck at the campground. The Jeep did offer additional carrying capacity, but we rarely ran out of space to store things.

Our only regret is that we didn't swap out the MH for an AS 10 years earlier.

The Ice Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2016, 09:14 PM   #13
3 Rivet Member
Wolf Alaska's Avatar
Currently Looking...
Currently Looking...
Madison , Alabama
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 156
Images: 7
I have a Coach House Type B. Use it or my Excursion as TVs, depending on the trip. Going long trips, very nice to O/N in CH & leave TT alone. Can power TT up via CH genset, again that's nice. Leave TT in CG & tour area in Type B. All eqpt is right there with you. There are a few V10 CH B's out there. Ours is a 5.8 L roller cam V8. Coach is perfect for 20 years now.
Let's Roll !
Wolf Alaska
Wolf Alaska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 09:32 AM   #14
1 Rivet Member
silvereagle2's Avatar
2014 27' FB International
Cary , North Carolina
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 17
Traveling experience in a MH vs TV

In addition to all of the other very valid points made on this thread, I would like to add some considerations related to the actual travel experience in a MH. My wife and I owned several TTs and worked our way up to a 28 foot Airstream. Then we got the MH bug, easily sold the Airstream and moved to a Class C MH, then later traded that for a Class A MH. We became annoyed with all of the complications mentioned before, but in particular whenever we traveled we had the following issues in the MHs:

- The noise was unbearable due to the wind rattling the windows, fans running on the front windshield, onboard engine roaring, and things moving around in the cabinets in the living area behind us
- The Class A had a spectacular view in the front windshield, but sometimes the sun and brightness had to be tolerated
- Any additional passengers other than the driver and copilot had very uncomfortable seating, sitting backwards or to the side going down the road. Furthermore, the windows offered much less visibility than riding in the backseat of a TV
- Yes passengers can use the bathroom while going down the road, but it was like surfing waves to get back there! Also, almost every bladder break included the driver, so we stopped anyway every hour and a half or 2 hours to walk around a bit, so we really didn't utilize this advantage much

So we traded in the MH (at quite a loss) and now own a 27FB Airstream TT and are much happier traveling in our very quiet and comfortable TV!

silvereagle2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What trip interruption problems have you encountered with your vintage MoHo? cdufault Argosy Motorhomes 19 08-04-2016 12:01 PM
My beautiful Airstream is gone, gone, gone. mhilley On The Road... 55 02-12-2012 10:44 AM
That page peal is gone! IT's GONE! GONE! YES!! AIR-Quarius Off Topic Forum 2 10-11-2010 02:18 PM
Where have you gone this year? wheel interested On The Road... 66 05-22-2007 09:24 AM

Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.