|
|
07-03-2018, 10:32 AM
|
#41
|
Moderator
2004 30' Classic Slideout
Fenton
, Missouri
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
Jack,
I know you addressed this to Roger, but I hope you don't mind if I comment on some things I found interesting in your post.
I suspect the reason the tires were physically larger was that the Maxxis's had cap plies and that's what prevented the tread detachment that you experienced earlier with the Goodyear Marathons. That is, both tires suffered belt leaving belt separations, but the cap plies acted like a bandage. It may also be the reason why you were at season 4, where previously you were at season 3.
Cap plies reduce the amount of centrifugal movement - and therefore that amount of stress the belt edges experience.
However, cap plies, in and of themselves, are not sufficient to prevent belt leaving belt separations.
From a tire engineering perspective, this change was also a load carrying capacity increase, just like the change from LR D to LR E you did the step before. This is on top of the change from ST to LT and the change from Maxxis to Michelin. Statisticians would say that those 3 things are "confounded" - meaning you can't figure out which change is significant given the data in front of you.
I really dislike the way they did that statement. I think they were very awkwardly trying to explain that the number of cycles loaded (revolutions) plays a role in a tire's life and that one should not expect a tire to last forever.
However, they seemed to imply that ST tires are different than other types of tire in this regard. They are NOT! ALL tires have this property. It's a part of the way this works - a "Laws of Physics" kind of thing. In engineering terms, this is called "Fatigue".
|
CapriRacer,
One of reasons I specifically chose the Maxxis as my replacement for the Marathons was that cap ply feature. Obviously I was hoping that the belts would have less tendency to separate.
With the fact that we went to load rated E tires and a belt cap and still had belt separation at close periods withtwo different brands of ST tires would now point out the fatigue issue? Going back to my contention that there may be a direct relationship between the amount of weight that tire has to bear and its life expectancy?
There seems to be a plausible theory to me that a Michelin LT in the E rated 16” version has some attributes, construction, materials, etc. that seem to resist the fatigue factor caused by my Classic slideout’s higher weight. Considering the cold inflation levels I keep, my favorable storage conditions, and towing speeds, no road or sidewall damage or abuse, I fail to come up with any other smoking guns.
Jack
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Jack Canavera
STL Mo.
AIR #56 S/OS#15
'04 Classic 30' S.O.,'03 GMC Savana 2500
|
|
|
07-04-2018, 07:01 AM
|
#42
|
Rivet Master
2013 31' Classic
billings
, Montana
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,577
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcanavera
CapriRacer,
One of reasons I specifically chose the Maxxis as my replacement for the Marathons was that cap ply feature. Obviously I was hoping that the belts would have less tendency to separate.
With the fact that we went to load rated E tires and a belt cap and still had belt separation at close periods withtwo different brands of ST tires would now point out the fatigue issue? Going back to my contention that there may be a direct relationship between the amount of weight that tire has to bear and its life expectancy?
There seems to be a plausible theory to me that a Michelin LT in the E rated 16” version has some attributes, construction, materials, etc. that seem to resist the fatigue factor caused by my Classic slideout’s higher weight. Considering the cold inflation levels I keep, my favorable storage conditions, and towing speeds, no road or sidewall damage or abuse, I fail to come up with any other smoking guns.
Jack
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
Look and see where these maxis tires are made.....
|
|
|
07-04-2018, 07:04 AM
|
#43
|
Moderator
2004 30' Classic Slideout
Fenton
, Missouri
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjdonahoe
Look and see where these maxis tires are made.....
|
Last time I checked they were Taiwan I thought. Maxxis is a well respected manufacturer in the market.
__________________
Jack Canavera
STL Mo.
AIR #56 S/OS#15
'04 Classic 30' S.O.,'03 GMC Savana 2500
|
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:18 AM
|
#44
|
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
Ravenna
, Ohio
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,344
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SailorSam205
Roger,
I understand the inspection, but did you really mean every 2,000 miles? For me, that would have me jacking up my trailer multiple times per trip. I've got a trip planned to the Grand Canyon and Albuquerque that is about 5k miles...
|
Not all folks pulling trailers travel that much. Aome claim to only travel 3 - 4000 a year in multiple short trips.
I would certainly check before leaving and as soon as you return from your long trip. My point was that the inspection is not a one time thing but it can be good insurance.
__________________
Retired tire engineer (50 years). Write a blog on RV Tire Safety Net. Give seminars for FMCA across the US. Tucson AZ in Mar 2024 is next.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|