Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-20-2015, 05:33 PM   #41
3 Rivet Member
 
let's play's Avatar
 
2002 34' Classic S/O
Currently Looking...
round lake , Illinois
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 130
My experience:

6 gymt on a 2005 boat trailer, combined weight of trailer and boat around 12,500lbs. I never had a problem and replaced them in 2014 with carlisles, why? Less than $600 out the door done locally and upgraded from D to E rating. I have trailered from chicago to miami to ozarks and everywhere in between.

4 gymt on a 2002 wells cargo 7,000lb tool trailer, in poor shape but they are still on there and will be replace with what I find reasonably priced as this trailer stays within 50 miles of home.

4 gymt on the airstream purchased in 2010. Look like brand new and feel no need to replace them at this time.

I think a lot of people like to have their opinions heard...but that's what a forum is about, people talking to talk LOL
cale
let's play is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2015, 07:40 PM   #42
4 Rivet Member
 
Currently Looking...
z , North Carolina
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 262
Images: 7
I Took The Plunge

Just wanted to say a huge "Thank you" to Jack. I sent him a PM and he called me to discuss this topic over the horn. Jack's an awfully nice guy, and willing to lend an ear or hand at a moments notice. He's a first class WBCCI member.

After hearing Jack's response to my queries, it was very obvious he had this subject well covered. After our discussion, I pulled out the shinies I had saved, and ordered the Michelin 16" tires & rims today. I just can't deal with having to keep looking in the mirror HOPING we won't lose a tire. Piece of mind to me is priceless.

So I guess I can't get in on Phoenix's survey, but if he adds a section that shows
"Influenced by fellow AS friends to ditch the POS GYM" I'll be the first to respond.

Thanks again Jack! You my friend, are an awesome fellow.
Pics of my upgrade just as soon as they get here. With a 70k mile warranty on the tires, I too will be looking from afar from this thread. Wooohooo!!
Sea ya down the road,
Gavin
FishinHatteras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2015, 09:21 PM   #43
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Gavin, all tires have flats or blowouts. Good luck with your decision.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2015, 08:15 AM   #44
Always learning
 
Lance M's Avatar
 
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central , Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
Images: 24
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to Lance M
Not even in the same league

A question I always have in my mind is how much weight would an LT tire be rated for if its speed were limited to 65MPH?.
Two tires that I often compare (in my mind)
GoodYear Marathon ST225/75/15 LRD #2,540 max 65MPH
Pirelli Scorpion STR LT235/75/15 LRD #2,335 max 112 MPH

To me, a tire capable of carrying #2,335 at 112MPH would be a better choice than one that can carry 205 pounds more but is limited to 65 MPH.
__________________
Lance

Work is never done, so take time to play!
Lance M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2015, 09:08 AM   #45
Rivet Master
 
SteveH's Avatar
 
2005 39' Land Yacht 390 XL 396
Common Sense , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top View Post
A question I always have in my mind is how much weight would an LT tire be rated for if its speed were limited to 65MPH?.
Two tires that I often compare (in my mind)
GoodYear Marathon ST225/75/15 LRD #2,540 max 65MPH
Pirelli Scorpion STR LT235/75/15 LRD #2,335 max 112 MPH

To me, a tire capable of carrying #2,335 at 112MPH would be a better choice than one that can carry 205 pounds more but is limited to 65 MPH.
Lance, I would have to agree with your thinking.

And in addition, I have read that ST tires have the weight rating they do because they are restricted to 65 mph, and from steering and drive wheel locations, i.e. to trailers.

However, the tire "guru's" say if you use any other tire on a trailer, it must be derated in weight capacity, even though that tire is designed for higher speed, steering and drive axle locations.

Makes no sense to me. I often have the thought that it's a conspiracy by the tire manufacturers to make more money selling an inferior product at a high price, but that's the way my suspicious mind leans.
__________________
Regards,
Steve
SteveH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 07:36 AM   #46
CapriRacer
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
I'm in the , US
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveH View Post
....... However, the tire "guru's" say if you use any other tire on a trailer, it must be derated in weight capacity, even though that tire is designed for higher speed, steering and drive axle locations. .......
That only applies to P metric tires - and the difference is the softness of the suspension. A trailer (or a truck) has a much stiffer suspension, so the tire has to absorb more of the pavement irregularities, so in order to get the same level of durability, the load on the tire has to be reduced.
CapriRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 09:32 AM   #47
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
 
Ravenna , Ohio
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top View Post
A question I always have in my mind is how much weight would an LT tire be rated for if its speed were limited to 65MPH?.
Two tires that I often compare (in my mind)
GoodYear Marathon ST225/75/15 LRD #2,540 max 65MPH
Pirelli Scorpion STR LT235/75/15 LRD #2,335 max 112 MPH

To me, a tire capable of carrying #2,335 at 112MPH would be a better choice than one that can carry 205 pounds more but is limited to 65 MPH.
One thing to check is the speed limit for RV application as published in the tire companies literature. For many that have actually bothered to put together a guide 9like Goodyear & Michelin but not "Cheep-O" tires as sold by Billy-Jo-Bob low cost tire and bait store) I think you will see 75 mph max even for tires with Speed rating Symbols that are faster.

Tire ratings are based on normal application conditions which include the expected % of time a tire is asked to carry 90+% of its rated load etc.

If you try and "game" the system you can expect problems.

Taken to the extreme maybe a 15" NASCAR tire rated at 200 mph with 3,000 load would be a good choice. Of course it isn't designed to retain air for more than a few hours or ever hit a pot hole or curb but maybe you could test out a set and let us know how well they worked in trailer application..
__________________
Retired tire engineer (50 years). Write a blog on RV Tire Safety Net. Give seminars for FMCA across the US. Tucson AZ in Mar 2024 is next.
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 09:39 AM   #48
Rivet Master
 
SteveSueMac's Avatar

 
2012 27' Flying Cloud
W , New England
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,402
How much faster than 65 do folks typically want to go with your trailer in tow anyway? Even with the Michelins on mine, I rarely go above 62-65, often less than 60 and rarely above that for brief stretches.

Lots can go wrong pretty fast and having a few extra tons on your back complicates matters exponentially.

Those Pirelli's have more load capacity than the Michelins and appear to be the same size/aspect ratio. I almost picked up some 15" Goodyear Cargo tires with 2450# capacity at 65psi but the aspect ratio would have required a hitch adjustment I wasn't prepared to make. The belly pan is already pretty low to the ground...
SteveSueMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 10:01 AM   #49
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
 
Ravenna , Ohio
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
Quote: "It is a fact that of the 30,000 or so RVs that have been weighed with individual tire position scales over half have one or more tires in an overload condition. In any population of products if over half are being used beyond their design intent (max load based on measured inflation) why would we be surprised if there is a relatively high failure rate?"
----------
248 AirForums members completed the Tire Failure Poll. 118 Airstreams had 173 tires that failed. Most of these were OEM GYMs or ST tires in a size and inflation pressure specified by the Airstream factory.

While similar data for 16" wheels and LT tires are not available, it looks like only five LT tire failures have been reported by AirForums members who switched.

In my opinion, unless those 30,000 RVs are Airstreams and the tire models, sizes and inflation pressures are available, I don't see how this data is pertinent. Could you please cite your source

RV Safety & Education Foundation
and provide a data extract of only Airstreams with OEM-spec tires and inflation pressures? Without comparable data, this comparison is of apples and oranges. Sorry you will have to ask them or go to one of their seminars.

If this information is unavailable, I don't know why AirForums members should accept the blame for tire failures, when the personal experiences of many indicate that ST tires have not been well-suited for use on their Airstreams.
==========
Quote: "It is important to remember that if you do not properly identify the real reason for a product failure simply changing the brand or painting your RV a different color will probably not prevent a recurrence of a future failure."
----------

In my opinion, this statement is untrue.

As non-tire-engineers, we do NOT need to know the exact cause of tire failures. By trial and error, many of us have determined for ourselves that (at least on our own Airstreams) LT tires are more reliable than ST tires; and switching to 16" wheels and LT tires WILL greatly reduce the chances of future failures.
Interesting interpretation on the validity of using Science to try and learn something.

If as you believe it is not important to understand the real reason why something failed I have to wonder if you have ever gone to a Doctor. After all if they prescribe medicine for you it is based on studies done on other people, maybe its of no value to believe that you will probably react the same way. Got a headache? Try some cyanide. Who knows it may work on you for just because cyanide kills others that doesn't mean it will kill you. Right?

See the problem with using your approach to problem solving?

Correlation is not proof of Causation

Do you actually believe the tires know the type TT they are on and they only fail on silver ones? Does being an Airstream somehow protect a tire from ever getting a puncture? For following your logic we can blame the tire for ever being punctures or for that matter we can blame the tire if the valve leaks.

You are entitled to your opinion but as an engineer who uses the "Scientific Method" to solve problems just as Doctors do or Airline Pilots do or Race Car drivers do, it has been shown that facts learned through detailed observation of the natural world can most likely be applied to other objects in the natural world and failures can be reduced.

Good luck with your system of just buying new products till you no longer have any problems and never listening to others who spent their lives trying to make product improvements based on facts.

We will have to agree to disagree that facts matter.
Safe travels.
__________________
Retired tire engineer (50 years). Write a blog on RV Tire Safety Net. Give seminars for FMCA across the US. Tucson AZ in Mar 2024 is next.
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 10:04 AM   #50
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
 
Ravenna , Ohio
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveSueMac View Post
How much faster than 65 do folks typically want to go with your trailer in tow anyway? Even with the Michelins on mine, I rarely go above 62-65, often less than 60 and rarely above that for brief stretches.

Lots can go wrong pretty fast and having a few extra tons on your back complicates matters exponentially.

Those Pirelli's have more load capacity than the Michelins and appear to be the same size/aspect ratio. I almost picked up some 15" Goodyear Cargo tires with 2450# capacity at 65psi but the aspect ratio would have required a hitch adjustment I wasn't prepared to make. The belly pan is already pretty low to the ground...
So how is 2,335# greater than 2,540#? or was that a typo or do you have data to support your idea?
__________________
Retired tire engineer (50 years). Write a blog on RV Tire Safety Net. Give seminars for FMCA across the US. Tucson AZ in Mar 2024 is next.
Tireman9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 10:24 AM   #51
Always learning
 
Lance M's Avatar
 
1972 29' Ambassador
1962 19' Globetrotter
1951 21' Flying Cloud
Central , Texas
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,881
Images: 24
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to Lance M
Speaking for Steve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tireman9 View Post
So how is 2,335# greater than 2,540#? or was that a typo or do you have data to support your idea?
Sometimes when we feel offended we get a bit touchy, eh?

Steve is talking about the Michelin LTX MS2 P235/75/15XL and the Pirelli Scorpion LT235/75/15 LRD that I linked.
__________________
Lance

Work is never done, so take time to play!
Lance M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 11:22 AM   #52
"Cloudsplitter"

 
2003 25' Classic
Houstatlantavegas , Malebolgia
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20,000
Images: 1
Thumbs up

"For us, increased tire reliability and reduction in downtime on the side of the road are worth any additional expense."
__________________

Thank you...for the realization that there can be more than one route to the same destination.

For us and for you do not need be the same.

Sweet Streams

Bob
ROBERT CROSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 12:05 PM   #53
Rivet Master
 
SteveSueMac's Avatar

 
2012 27' Flying Cloud
W , New England
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tireman9 View Post
So how is 2,335# greater than 2,540#? or was that a typo or do you have data to support your idea?

Sorry - should have specified I have the 15" Pmetric Michelins which derated come in around 1900#...
SteveSueMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 01:26 PM   #54
Rivet Master
 
1988 25' Excella
1987 32' Excella
Knoxville , Tennessee
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,118
Blog Entries: 1
"How much faster than 65 do folks typically want to go with your trailer in tow anyway?"

The issue to me is more how the load ratings are determined rather than how fast we want to drive. Even though the Goodiyear Marathan Tires are speed rated at 65 it is, according to Goodyear, okay to drive them at 75 mph if you put in more air than it says on the sidewall max. Confusing and fustrating.

But the question for some of us is how much load would the P235 XL tires be rated for if they were tested the same as the ST tire. I suspect it would be a lot more than they are rated for now. In other words, I suspect that comparing load ratings between ST and P tires is a sort of apple/oranges thing. So if I need la load capacity of 1800 lbs am I better off with a p235 XL derated to 1985 lbs or a ST tire with a 2500 lb max load. I suspect the extra "safety margin" from the ST tire is an illusion born from different testing and rating methods.
Bill M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 02:31 PM   #55
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
K.C. , Missouri
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 585
Quote:
....snip.....

Even though the Goodiyear Marathan Tires are speed rated at 65 it is, according to Goodyear, okay to drive them at 75 mph if you put in more air than it says on the sidewall max. Confusing and fustrating.
First of all, I'm not trying to pick a fight here. Second, I have no dog in this fight anyway because I don't buy ST tires. Having thrown those disclaimers out there, I think the key word in the above quote is "confusing".

Here is the quote from the goodyear product service bulletin issued to dealers:

"Goodyear Marathon Special Trailer tires, with the “ST” size designation, are speed rated at 65 MPH (105 km/h) under normal inflation and load conditions."

....it then goes on to say:

"If Goodyear tires, with the ST designation, are used at speeds between 66 and 75 mph (106 km/h and 120 km/h), we recommend the cold inflation pressure be increased by 10 psi (70 kPa) above the recommended pressure based on the trailer placard for normal inflation and load conditions."
===============
Now then, to me, the confusing part of this is that the "implication" is the consumer could increase the inflation to 75psi. I suspect that is NOT what goodyear is trying to say however. What they "are" saying is the inflation can be increased 10 psi "above the recommended pressure based on the trailer placard for normal inflation and load conditions".

In other words, they may be saying you could literally increase the inflation pressure 10 psi above what the load/inflation table states is the acceptable minimum.

So for instance, if the load/inflation table says that you could run 55 psi for the given specific load, then you could run 65 mph at 55 psi. To increase your speed to 75 mph, you could increase the pressure to 65 psi. Further, you cannot assume an increase in load capacity by this pressure increase, only a speed capacity increase.

Hopefully Roger or Barry will weigh in on this, but I personally have not seen a tire manufacturer that "allows" for tires to be inflated beyond the psi stated on the tire sidewall. I will stand corrected on that however if one of the tire engineers say that I am in error on that.

geo
gmw photos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:00 PM   #56
Rivet Master
 
J. Morgan's Avatar
 
1972 31' Sovereign
1975 31' Excella 500
Currently Looking...
Benton , Arkansas
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,868
Images: 11
Does it make me bad if I towed my ST tires in excess of 75 MPH frequently when crossing Texas?






1/2 Ton 4WD Truck, 72 Sovereign Hensley Arrow
__________________
The fact that I am opinionated does not presuppose that I am wrong......

J. Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:04 PM   #57
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Morgan View Post
Does it make me bad if I towed my ST tires in excess of 75 MPH frequently when crossing Texas?






1/2 Ton 4WD Truck, 72 Sovereign Hensley Arrow
Your trailer, your life. Thanks for the heads up.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:37 PM   #58
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Mantua , Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,062
Blog Entries: 2
And then we have those who spend bucks for LT. tires and yet run their tow vehicles too low to get a smoother ride. According to tire posts I have read in the past. No I have no proof of this!! Don't ask. Jim
xrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:41 PM   #59
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Jim, no problem. Proof is not needed when internet kitchen table engineers get on a roll.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:44 PM   #60
Rivet Master
 
SteveSueMac's Avatar

 
2012 27' Flying Cloud
W , New England
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Morgan View Post
Does it make me bad if I towed my ST tires in excess of 75 MPH frequently when crossing Texas?


:-)

This does not make you a bad person.

Using a Hensley? Well.....

JUST KIDDING now..... :-)
SteveSueMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad Marathon, Bad Marathon ROBERTSUNRUS Tires 45 11-01-2015 03:46 PM
GoodYear Marathon ST Tires and NHTSA 762x51 Tires 31 07-31-2013 06:59 AM
Goodyear Marathon Tires Ins. Man Tires 48 11-13-2011 06:57 AM
Goodyear Marathon Source Jabba Tires 28 02-22-2004 11:16 AM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.