Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-15-2005, 02:21 AM   #43
4 Rivet Member
Commercial Member
 
Currently Looking...
Somewhere , Indiana
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by john hd
hey henry

i spoke with my buddy, bad news, not much left of the unit except for a terminal block with a couple of wires.

however, he remembers reading an article on the web somewhere about the units and the problems people had with them.

so there is some info on the units floating around the net, just a matter of finding it! i did a google search and came up with zilch.

john
John,

Zilch is what Yahoo yeilded as well.

Thanks,
Henry
__________________

__________________
axleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2005, 10:55 AM   #44
Rivet Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by john hd
lou

let us know, anything is possible. those excellas had everything from central vaccums to bargeman safes! not to mention the propane powered onan generators!

john
John,
I talked to my buddy this morning. One of the guys that sits near him at C.T. worked on the first generation. He is now going to be writing up the testing procedures on the second generation.
He says he will ask him for the press releases they issue. These would be the press releases that the SAE and the auto companies receive. These will not be mainstream and they will be full of good technical information.
__________________

__________________
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2005, 01:37 PM   #45
Rivet Monster
 
wahoonc's Avatar

 
1975 31' Sovereign
1980 31' Excella II
Sprung Leak , North Carolina
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,174
Images: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by axleman
Aaron,



That is very interesting . I would love to see a sample, keep me informed if you manage to locate one. Sounds line an ingenious gizmo. I should have known that with this huge community of folks on the forum two people (at least) might have seen one .



Regards,

Henry
Henry,
What I am hoping to do is to locate one in a salvage unit. There is a RV salvage yard about 60 miles or so from me that used to have a fair collection of early 70's vintage airstreams, I am hoping one of those units may have one still in it. These are units that are pretty heavily damaged and in some cases pretty well stripped out. So we might just get lucky.

Aaron
__________________
....so many Airstreams....so little time...
WBCCI #XXXX AIR #2495
Why are we in this basket...and where are we going
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2005, 03:10 PM   #46
4 Rivet Member
Commercial Member
 
Currently Looking...
Somewhere , Indiana
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoonc
Henry,
What I am hoping to do is to locate one in a salvage unit. There is a RV salvage yard about 60 miles or so from me that used to have a fair collection of early 70's vintage airstreams, I am hoping one of those units may have one still in it. These are units that are pretty heavily damaged and in some cases pretty well stripped out. So we might just get lucky.

Aaron
Aaron,



I really appreciate your efforts. The folks on this forum have been excellent to correspond with. Thank you!



Regards,

Henry
__________________
axleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 09:28 AM   #47
Rivet Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,183
I have heard that the Continental Teves system will be available of some domestic vehicles sometime in the next 3 years. This is from my "engineering grapevine". It is an unofficial source but I think it is reliable.
I will be getting some SAE press release stuff later in the week.
__________________
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 11:27 AM   #48
4 Rivet Member
Commercial Member
 
Currently Looking...
Somewhere , Indiana
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by pattersontoo
I have heard that the Continental Teves system will be available of some domestic vehicles sometime in the next 3 years. This is from my "engineering grapevine". It is an unofficial source but I think it is reliable.
I will be getting some SAE press release stuff later in the week.
Lou,



You had mentioned a magazine article and talked to your buddy. Is there a link that you could provide to a web page that could show the early prototypes or concept of this system?



I am intrigued!



Thanks,

Henry
__________________
axleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 01:23 PM   #49
Rivet Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by axleman
Lou,



You had mentioned a magazine article and talked to your buddy. Is there a link that you could provide to a web page that could show the early prototypes or concept of this system?



I am intrigued!



Thanks,

Henry
Henry,
Don had mentioned the link in a previous post.
If you look at the EHB you will see that is sort of works like the ActiBrake system. If you look at the EMB it completely eliminates all need for brake boosters and hydraulic lines altogether. I should have some SAE infor in the near future. Unfortunately, my buddy that works there has to do his job during the day.
Here is the link:
http://www.conti-online.com/generato...2_0602_en.html

Lou
__________________
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 02:06 PM   #50
4 Rivet Member
Commercial Member
 
Currently Looking...
Somewhere , Indiana
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by pattersontoo
Don had mentioned the link in a previous post.
Here is the link:
http://www.conti-online.com/generato...2_0602_en.html

Lou
Lou,



I saw that link, I thought that if you had a “friend or two” in the business that you might be able to share some additional information.



Thanks for sharing,

Henry
__________________
axleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2005, 02:17 PM   #51
Rivet Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,183
I will be able to supply some additional information this weekend.
It will be technical press release stuff. It may even be a little deep for this thread. I will know more about what I have coming when I see it.
If anything I would post it to my Members Photos section for general consumption.
__________________
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 03:58 PM   #52
Rivet Master
 
2005 22' International CCD
Buckhorn , Ontario
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,773
Images: 59
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via Skype™ to GT1963
Thumbs up Fitting a 61 Overlander with 99 Excella running gear?

Hi Guys and Gals;

I know all might be sick of hearing about axles - but I have a slightly interesting question.

What is the width of a 99 29' Excella axle? and would it fit a 1961 overlander Chassy?

I got an okay on the wheels that they would fit the 61 - but at the time I knew nothing of the possibility of using the 99's axles.

We don't have the 99 just curios - if the guy ever wants to part it out.


Thanks
__________________
Everything will be alright in the end. If it is not alright now, then it is not the end.
GT1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 04:33 PM   #53
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,499
Images: 1
axle change outs

GT6921

The wide body axles are several inches wider than required for a 1961 trailer.

Also your trailer came equipped with 2300 pound axles.

Any axle from a 1968 and older Airstream would fit.

The next concern would be the rating.

I would suggest that you not exceed 3000 rating, per axle, but you must not mix two different ratings, either

You cannot mix a fairly good axel with a fairly bad axle. To do so would put more weight on the better axle, causing a sway, and ruining it in short order because it would carry more weight than it should.

Andy
__________________
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 04:59 PM   #54
Rivet Master
 
2005 22' International CCD
Buckhorn , Ontario
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,773
Images: 59
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via Skype™ to GT1963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inland RV Center, In
GT6921

The wide body axles are several inches wider than required for a 1961 trailer.

Also your trailer came equipped with 2300 pound axles.

Any axle from a 1968 and older Airstream would fit.

The next concern would be the rating.

I would suggest that you not exceed 3000 rating, per axle, but you must not mix two different ratings, either

You cannot mix a fairly good axel with a fairly bad axle. To do so would put more weight on the better axle, causing a sway, and ruining it in short order because it would carry more weight than it should.

Andy
Thanks Andy for the heads up. She is pretty heavy! and she is also a 28' foot rather than a 29' I was mistaken.

Well maybe we can score the wheels and tires at least - be a bit of savings anyway.
__________________
Everything will be alright in the end. If it is not alright now, then it is not the end.
GT1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005, 06:40 PM   #55
Rivet Master
Airstream Dealer
 
Inland RV Center, In's Avatar
 
Corona , California
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,499
Images: 1
GT6921.

The axle rating for a 1961 28 and 30 foot trailer is 2600 pounds.

I would suggest that you stay with a 3000 pound axle, unless you will "always" have it heavily loaded. In that case you could go to a 3500 pound axle.

In 1963 the 28 and 30 foot railers had axle ratings of 3200 pounds.

Other size trailers also had axle weight ratings increase over time, to provide more "payload". The trailers themselves, basically weighed the same.

The largest change occured with the 22 foot trailer.

A 61-62 22 foot trailer axle had a rating of 3600 pounds.

In 63 that changed to 4000 pounds. In 65 it changed to 5000 pounds.

Airstream has learned, in time, that axles can and do fail, if they are overloaded. They also fail if the rubber rods are not exercise once in a while. A trailer that has been parked for years with all the weight on the axles, will settle, since there was no movement.

Airstream then increase the ratings accordingly, so that the owner could expect far longer useage.

You can see how much the 22 foot rating changes, even though the same basic trailer design was used.

Andy
__________________
Inland RV Center, In is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2005, 12:48 AM   #56
Rivet Master
 
Coloradobus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 784
AXLE IS IN, now here is the question. Our old original axle on th '67 Globetrotter was rated 4,000 lbs. After re-hab, the GT weighs 4218 lbs., plus food, plus free standing A/C unit, plus bikes( on the bed), plus casket size ice chest. We replaced the old axle with a 6,000 lb axle with a 22.5 degree down angle, and after its all said and done, the GT doesn't stand any higher or lower than with the old axle. The same amount of sidewall is exposed beyond the wheel opening to the rim edge. However, while suspended in the air, the axle arm drops down more than on the old one. I was hoping for more height. Hmm, I wondering now if it WAS really necessary to replace the old one? From all reports, are we not supposed to enjoy a little more ground clearance? At least the ride is smooth and comfortable, even the side goucho stays put.
__________________

__________________
Coloradobus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.