Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Community Forums > On The Road...
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-28-2013, 10:08 AM   #21
Rivet Master
 
Road Ruler's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
St. Catharines , South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,367
Images: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodsterinfl View Post

In mid to fall 2014 Ford will debut the new F150 which is said to get 3-4 mpg difference than current offerings. We cant verify that yet BUT it is said to be 700+ pounds lighter, have an 8 speed tranny and have a more raked windshield - all things that contribute to better mileage towing or otherwise.
Sounds good if true. I have been slaming pickups for years for being too heavy for what they do, having poor aerodynamics, and poor fuel mileage.
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
Road Ruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 10:18 AM   #22
Rivet Master
 
Ag&Au's Avatar
 
Port Orchard , Washington
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,463
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkottum View Post
Hard to imagine you could save overall by selling and buying anything.
I Have proved that many times.

You can save a little on gas and spend a lot on the equipment you use to do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkottum View Post
Make do. The best and only realistic way to save on traveling costs is to reduce speed of travel, unless you are already at 55 mph. Less against the wind and climbing grades. Take off slowly as well, anticipate stopping to reduce braking.

doug k
Using the MPG guage on our truck, there is about a 2 MPG difference between 50 MPH and 70MPH when towing.

Ken
Ag&Au is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 10:32 AM   #23
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Mantua , Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,062
Blog Entries: 2
Give me an aerodynamic efficient vw and put two motor scooters in the ack with other misc items, oops I guess you need a pickup for that. I do not think your Canadian as dealer can can help with that. A car cannot do a trucks job, ie payload,towing,. Jim
xrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 10:41 AM   #24
Rivet Master
 
Over59's Avatar
 
1959 26' Overlander
Putnam , Connecticut
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,064
Images: 37
Downhill

My concern is whether your 150 can get you up the hill as when it fails you will just sit there. Medium sized problem. My concern is your truck and trailer combination is marginal going down hill. Very serious problem. People jump up and down about how they can tow with this and that... The only important question is what do you need to stop it when the trailer brakes start to fade. Buy a used diesel for the mountains. The difference will make you cry..... Also put a hangdowny thing on your mirror when towing to remember the trailer is back there....

If you continue to use your truck keep the camera in the front with you so you don't miss any great you tube moments...
Over59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 10:46 AM   #25
4 Rivet Member
 
Mrs.Mod's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Fresno , California
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 434
Images: 15
Our TV is a 2006 F-250. After people ask us if our AS was expensive, , they ask us about our fuel mileage. Depending on who is driving, we get about 16-18 mpg in town. Honestly we get about the same while towing. This could be, perhaps, because I do the majority of the driving while Mr. Leadfoot sleeps in the passenger seat.
After being fairly loyal GM people for years, we really love our Ford.
Fuel is definitely the largest part of our travel budget. We spend about 50 bucks on food for our family of 3, $70-150 for reservations, and at least $200 on fuel for one trip.
We don't shop for souvenirrs much. We take hikes or go geocaching for fun. Cheap and easy fun.
__________________
Cheers,
Cara, John & Johnny
Jet, Our silver stow-a-way
1977 31' Sovereign "The Mod Pod"
2006 Ford F-250 Super Duty
Mrs.Mod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:03 AM   #26
3 Rivet Member
 
Reganzo's Avatar
 
2006 34' Classic S/O
Lakewood , New Jersey
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 178
my last trip

On my last trip I towed my 34 foot Limited with my 2008 F-350 diesel 1500 miles. I averaged 11.5 miles/gal using the old fashioned method of gallons used by miles driven. Fuel varied and I spent 585.00 for the trip.

Campsites I parked in averaged 39.00 per night and we were gone 30 nights so we spent 1170.00 on camping, so adding up the fuel cost and camping cost we spent 1755.00. If you divide the 1755 by 30 it cost us 58.50 a night for room and fuel.

Even with fuel being high using my truck and trailer is still economical enough for my wife and I to visit this wonderful country of ours...

Regards,

Reganzo
Reganzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:18 AM   #27
Moderator
 
blmitch5's Avatar

 
2006 19' International CCD
Olathe , Kansas
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,224
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Over59 View Post
My concern is whether your 150 can get you up the hill as when it fails you will just sit there. Medium sized problem. My concern is your truck and trailer combination is marginal going down hill. Very serious problem. People jump up and down about how they can tow with this and that... The only important question is what do you need to stop it when the trailer brakes start to fade. Buy a used diesel for the mountains. The difference will make you cry..... Also put a hangdowny thing on your mirror when towing to remember the trailer is back there....

If you continue to use your truck keep the camera in the front with you so you don't miss any great you tube moments...
I think there is some confusion here. They are towing a 23' CCD not a 28'. Unless its a V6 they should be in the safe zone for towing. I agree a diesel would greatly improve their up hill towing.
__________________
Get involved and sign up for a Rally!
https://www.airforums.com/forums/calendar.php
WBCCI 4973
blmitch5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:38 AM   #28
Rivet Master
 
1988 32' Excella
Robbinsville , New Jersey
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodsterinfl View Post
The towing people on the F150 forum have been sharing how the ecoboost engine does not like to be lugging along but rather revving along. In other words, they are recommending the 3:55 rear axle over the traditional towing 3:75 and 4:10 to keep it out of the "lugging" during cruising. Otherwise the fuel mileage under boost hurts mpg.
What???
3.55 equals lower RPM equals "lugging along"
4.10 equals higher RPM equals "revving along"

Higher RPM equals more boost so that part saving fuel makes some sense.
Wazbro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:41 AM   #29
Rivet Master
 
Ag&Au's Avatar
 
Port Orchard , Washington
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,463
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by blmitch5 View Post
I think there is some confusion here. They are towing a 23' CCD not a 28'. Unless its a V6 they should be in the safe zone for towing. I agree a diesel would greatly improve their up hill towing.
There also seems to be another confusion. As best as I can tell, the post has nothing to do with the OP's original question/concerns. Perhap it is just a trolling post.

If so,he has caught two of us so far.

Ken
Ag&Au is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 11:51 AM   #30
Vintage Kin
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
Images: 1
To answer another aspect of the OP's query: No, changing trailer payload won't make that much difference to highway mpg. And it would only be incremental to stop'n'go or mountains. A lighter TT might be a bit better, but highway mpg is nearly all about aerodynamic resistance.

For any combination there are concerns:

The weight-distribution hitch needs to be set up properly; both vehicles need axle alignment and proper tire pressure. Brakes should be adjusted on either so that there is no drag.

All of these are details which need investigating in themselves. Take nothing for granted. Too many steering corrections, for example, versus an optimal minimum over 100-miles is a significant contributor to reduced fuel mileage.

MPG is kind of a game in knowing how well the vehicles are performing . . . but the gains have to do with the driver.

One does not drive to "keep up with the flow" of traffic, per se, but is respectful of distances needed for acceleration, turns, and braking. It's primarily a safety concern, but mpg also benefits from smooth application of vehicle controls.

Absolute numbers don't mean much . . it's the percentage gain from the baseline mpg that counts.

Start with records.

.
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 12:05 PM   #31
Master of Universe
 
Gene's Avatar
 
2008 25' Safari FB SE
Grand Junction , Colorado
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,711
Towing over mountains will kill gas mileage of any vehicle. You make up some going downhill, but not enough. Since fuel mileage standards are going up, things will get better in several years, but buying new to save a few mpg is usually not economical. Diesel trucks cost a lot more than a gas truck and a decent modern gas engine should be plenty powerful to drive over mountains; any truck can and should be geared down to go downhill and save brakes.

For some assignments, your wife could take a tent and save a lot.

The bigger problem is that you may not be able to afford either the trailer or motels and eating out—either option is expensive. And, if you sell a 2009 trailer that you bought new, you will take a big hit on depreciation; after 4 years, it should depreciate much less and your investment profile improves over the years. And maybe you can move to Longmont and live in Ken's backyard.

It looks like you are boxed into a situation which is hard to improve. Cutting expenses in little ways that add up plus finding a way to get more income may be your best answer.

Gene
__________________
Gene

The Airstream is sold; a 2016 Nash 24M replaced it.
Gene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 12:40 PM   #32
Wise Elder
 
Jammer's Avatar
 
2010 30' Classic
Vintage Kin Owner
South of the river , Minnesota
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmarquis View Post
My wife and I bought a 23' 2009 Airstream International. My wife a writer/film maker spends a good amount of of time on assignment in the National Parks and the Airsteam has been a great mobile office. We have had MANY fun adventures with it. But we find it more and more difficult to afford to take it anywhere much farther than an hour or so outside of our home town (Boulder,CO). The price of gas and the measly 12 or so mpg my 2006 F150 gets is seriously holding us back. It may be cheaper to drive a car and get a hotel room. (I know not the same experience) So some questions for everyone:

Am I alone?
No. For longer distances and fewer nights away from home, there comes a point where gas costs predominate.

Quote:
Would a new F150 ecoboost get me any farther (new car payment aside)
Maybe, but not enough to make a big difference.

Quote:
Does anyone have any insight for tow vehicles in the future that might be more efficient.
No. The biggest thing you can do, if gasoline prices are a big deal to you, is slow down.

Quote:
I hear the vintage Airsteams were a lot lighter. What is it about the new ones that make them so damn heavy?
1. Vintage Airstreams were not as light when new as is typically believed. The published weights you're no doubt using as a point of comparison do not include any optional equipment, and on vintage Airstreams, everything was optional: fridge, propane tanks, water heater, spare tire, battery, TV antenna, etc.

2. New Airstreams have a good deal of standard equipment that was hardly ever ordered, or in some cases, simply not available, in 1960. Among these: Dual batteries, electric tongue jack, zip-dee awning, air conditioner, television, microwave, greywater tank, fantastic fan, shower door.

3. Many newer Airstreams are wide bodies (though yours is not) which adds weight.

4. The structural changes to address the rear end separation in early years, and to allow for the addition of items listed above in point #2, has added weight.

5. On some models the interior buildout is heavier, adding weight.

Quote:
Do you think airstream has considered making lighter trailers? (I believe the sport model maybe the lightest?)

If I removed everything from the trailer that I don't need to save weight would it make much of a difference?
Most of the MPG hit is from wind resistance. In practice a moderate change in weight (a few hundred pounds) will result in a modest change in MPG (1 mpg or less). Is it worth it?

Quote:
Driving over the Colorado mountain passes is killing my mpg. Maybe I should have gotten a diesel?
I did the math and concluded that the additional depreciation and maintenance costs exceeded the fuel savings. Maybe your situation is different.

Quote:
I've been thinking of selling the airstream and getting something more practical like So-Cal Teardrops - Home or a light weight egg shell trailer.
It depends how you want to travel and how far you go. You could also consider pop-up pickup campers or a B van if MPG is really your thing.
__________________
To learn to see below the surface, you must adjust your altitude
Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 12:48 PM   #33
Site Team
 
Aage's Avatar
 
1974 31' Sovereign
Ottawa , ON
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11,219
Images: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmarquis View Post
Would a new F150 ecoboost get me any farther (new car payment aside)
I think the only reason for getting a Ford EcoBoost engine (aside from paying out a lot of money for a new truck) is that, in the mountains, it will not be affected by the altitude, since it has a turbocharged engine.

In other words, you will still only get something like ~12MPG towing, but it will be more satisfying going up, while no different going down, the mountains.

One could raise a good argument for only towing in mountains, if you had one of those!

Say, this thread could be a good information source for writing a magazine article. Oops, did I say that out loud?
__________________
“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.”
...John Wayne...........................
Aage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 01:57 PM   #34
3 Rivet Member
 
Airstream Dad's Avatar
 
2005 28' International CCD
Arlington , Virginia
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 166
Images: 1
On the topic of mileage, I get the sense that the advent of clean diesels in large size SUVs is going to be a towing game changer. I love my 2011 Dodge Durango V8 (seven seater family SUV that's an awesome tower), but when I saw the specs on this beauty, the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Diesel:

2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee: New Diesel Delivers 420 Lb-Ft, 30 MPG | AutoGuide.com News

I started planning for my next TV. The Grand Cherokee V6 Diesel matches my Durango V8 gasoline tow capacity at 7,400 lbs, at more that DOUBLE the gas mileage of a whopping 30mpg on the highway (currently I get maybe 11-12mpg towing, I'm sure the Jeep will do better than 24 mpg). That plus the sweet eight speed transmission likely makes this my next car. I'll look for one used after 2016.

Cheers,

Airstream Dad
Airstream Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 03:10 PM   #35
Rivet Master
 
Road Ruler's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
St. Catharines , South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,367
Images: 38
That new Jeep V6 diesel sounds real good. Hopefully it won't be priced out of the hemisphere.
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
Road Ruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 03:34 PM   #36
Rivet Master
 
mutcth's Avatar
 
2007 23' Safari SE
Central , Connecticut
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airstream Dad View Post
The Grand Cherokee V6 Diesel matches my Durango V8 gasoline tow capacity at 7,400 lbs, at more that DOUBLE the gas mileage of a whopping 30mpg on the highway (currently I get maybe 11-12mpg towing, I'm sure the Jeep will do better than 24 mpg).
I love my Durango as well, and am greatly looking forwards to trying a GC diesel. While I wish the diesel would get 24 mpg towing, it won't. (Most folks with Mercedes or VW diesels seem lucky to hit 16 mpg towing.)

That 30 mpg highway compares to the 22 or so I can eke out of the Durango Hemi when cruising without the trailer.

Tom
__________________
Now: 2007 Safari SE 23' "Anne" towed by 2011 Dodge Durango "Herman"
Before: Argosy Minuet and T@B, towed by various Honda Odysseys
mutcth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 04:40 PM   #37
Rivet Master
Commercial Member
 
Andrew T's Avatar

 
2019 27' Tommy Bahama
London , Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,347
If you want to maximize fuel economy towing an Airstream then the best tow vehicle is a Sedan. Blocking more air for the Airstream with a truck does not help like it does with a box trailer.

We have about 150,000 miles of towing experience with Jetta TDI's now and have delivered a couple of 23' Airstreams out west with them. You do down shift on hills but the performance is more than respectable and you can quite easily exceed 20 miles per US gallon towing and 50 solo. What ever time you loose on hills will be easily saved in gas stations.

The new Jetta is not as good a towvehicle as our 2010 model but the new Passat has the same drivetrain with a longer wheelbase and wider stance. Its an option if you don't need the pickup's storage space.

Andrew T
__________________
Andrew Thomson
London, Ontario

"One test is worth a thousand expert opinions."
Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot
Andrew T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 05:29 PM   #38
Rivet Master
 
2010 25' FB Flying Cloud
Davenport , Iowa
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,148
Blog Entries: 1
You stated that you are using it for your business. Consider the tax deduction, the convenience of being on site, time driving to a motel plus the associated costs. Another idea would be a small motor home, class D???
Airtandem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 05:40 PM   #39
2 Rivet Member
 
Columbus , Ohio
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
When I read this title I think of how expensive new A/S trailers are and I was going to respond. "Me Either". I can not afford a new one either.

When you wife is 'on assignment' does she get reimbursted for expenses? Or is she a freelancer?

Usually when you trade a truck or a trailer you lose big $$$ The most economical action is to keep what you have.

Maybe trade for an A/S Sport and tow with a mid-size truck. Tow a Sport with a VW diesel car like what was mentioned before. If that would work great!!
tuffr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 05:55 PM   #40
Tino
 
Tino643's Avatar
 
Currently Looking...
Blainville , Quebec
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foiled Again View Post
Have you checked into a hotel lately? The $30 per night room rate usually includes all the cockroaches and bedbugs you can eat. Local taxes often add 10% or more to the motel's posted rate. Decent rooms start at $50 or $60 especially in tourist season.

I'd worry a bit about a F-150 and a 28 footer in the mountains of Colorado - easily doable on the flatlands of Eastern US, but in the west... ?

There is ONE big factor you apparently aren't considering or aren't taking advantage of - COST OF PREPARED FOOD. If you have to eat out because you're staying in a hotel... there's your gas money. I enjoy eating out, but let's face it you can have a better balanced diet with less salt and fat and controlled portion size if you do it at home. At the average restaurant, the cost of FOOD is 20-28% of the bill you receive. Really simple things can save a bunch of money, but planning really helps too.

I'm solo and full time, but I still make spaghetti sauce to feed 10 people - then Freeze a bunch in sealed boiling bags. With limited storage in the freezer I DO eat the same dinner two or three times a week, but just change up the pasta, cheese and sides for variety.

A diesel won't save you that much - because for no logical reason - diesel fuel (a less refined product) is higher priced than gasoline. AND mine needs synthetic oil - 9 quarts at every tune up.

Reducing weight - certainly won't hurt, but don't kill yourself over a .5 mpg improvement. Putt along at 55 miles per hour, and you'll save a lot more. Of course planning your travel times to avoid heavy traffic with it's stops and starts is key too. SOB's with their poor aerodynamics usually screw your gas mileage worse than the bigger Airstreams, so just be smart, plan ahead, search the internet for campground bargains, and food bargains to offset the cost of the Airstream.

Paula
Ho! Yes the beauty of good food...I am Canadian and i don't want to be rude but it is hard to eat well and healty in lost of place in USA and Canada. So for us it is a great think to prepared our food.... Whit a Airstream, you have your little house and do what you want. It is priceless...
Tino643 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.