Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-27-2016, 11:39 AM   #1
2 Rivet Member
 
Major Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 37
Getting back into photography, any camera geeks here to help me choose?!

I used to shoot with the Contax G2 system, with the complete line of lenses. When the digital age took over I lost interest in my hobby and sold my gear. Now I'm interested in getting back into it. I have been looking at some compact cameras and want opinions.
1. Leica D-lux
2. Leica V-lux
3. Hasselblad Lunar
4. Hasselblad Stellar ( pocket camera, no interchangeable lenses)

Thanks for your input📸



"Now it's time to leave the capsule if you dare".
🌎
__________________

__________________
Major Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 11:50 AM   #2
Full time Airstreamer
 
SCOTTinNJ's Avatar
 
2014 30' FB FC Bunk
Anywhere , USA Living.Somewhere.Yonder
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,161
Do you not want interchangeable lenses?

How are your digital editing skills? Do you want to be editing RAW files or just get JPEGs out of the camera?
__________________

__________________
@living.somewhere.yonder | Instagram
SCOTTinNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 12:55 PM   #3
4 Rivet Member
 
sgschwend's Avatar
 
1986 25' Sovereign
2008 F350, 6.4L diesel , Oak Harbor, WA
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 437
Images: 11
I find that digital data speed is sometimes an issue, there are multiple methods. I recommend you checkout the data download rate of the equipment you are interested in.

The next detail I would take a look at is the CCD digital performance. In a way it is like the fidelity of a audio system. Not all CCD devices perform the same.

good luck
__________________
sgschwend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 08:11 PM   #4
2 Rivet Member
 
Major Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTTinNJ View Post
Do you not want interchangeable lenses?

How are your digital editing skills? Do you want to be editing RAW files or just get JPEGs out of the camera?

I do want interchangeable lenses, yes. I am a novice at digital editing as my previous serious camera was film and I mostly shot in B&W and printed in platinum/palladium. I avoided digital for so long because it seemed like "cheating" to me to do so much post production editing. I used to pride myself on printing the full negative so there was more time spent getting the shot than there was editing. So I have been out of the game for some time now and everything has changed on me!
__________________
Major Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 08:59 PM   #5
Full time Airstreamer
 
SCOTTinNJ's Avatar
 
2014 30' FB FC Bunk
Anywhere , USA Living.Somewhere.Yonder
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,161
You might want to look at M43 cameras like Olympus. They can use a lot of the old lenses you may be familiar with with adapters. And the electronic viewfinders have split screens with zoom that help aging eyes (and good eyes) manually focus.

While I haven't tried them, from what I understand they also have excellent JPG output. So much so that some people do not bother to shoot JPG and Raw, only the former.

I've read that about Fuji as well but the lens selection is not as extensive although their sensor is bigger.
__________________
@living.somewhere.yonder | Instagram
SCOTTinNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 09:29 PM   #6
3 Rivet Member
 
amaier7771's Avatar
 
2013 25' FB Flying Cloud
Vintage Kin Owner
Colorado Springs , Colorado
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 102
Images: 1
Like you, I pretty much left photography when digital started arriving. After shooting Large Format sheet film, 35mm film in Leica, Nikon, Canon, and Hasselblad, and doing much of my own lab work, I also sold most of my equipment.

As Digital started to mature in both resolution and "in camera" control and processing, I regained my interest. Choice of photography equipment highly personal, and as with as many opinions on correct choice of brand and equipment as there are opinions on this forum as to the correct Tow Vehicle, or the correct WD/Sway Hitch technology!!!

After a few disappointing attempts, I have settled on the LEICA D-Lux series for a never fail pocket camera, and a NIKON FX format D750 body with which you can use almost every 35mm lens ever made by Nikon. I seldom ever do any "post-Processing" on a computer. And just like my old film cameras, I almost always shoot by setting my own exposure choices, but also have the opportunity to quickly switch to full auto when things get wild.

The Leica D-Lux is an amazing camera with which you would not be disappointed!!

Have Fun!!
__________________
amaier7771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 09:32 PM   #7
Free Range Human
 
Drathaar's Avatar
 
2012 25' FB Flying Cloud
Currently Looking...
Twin Rocks , Oregon
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 709
Images: 4
If it were me, I'd look at some of the full frame DSLR cameras. I'm a Nikon guy and shoot the D810 36 mega pickle body for my landscape and some wildlife. The Canon 5D Mk III is excellent as well, as are the Sony cameras. If you're into medium format, Pentax has a very good (and affordable by medium format standards) camera. You can also consider some of the mirrorless cameras like the Sony a7r ii.

All good! Check DP reviews for objective feedback on the cameras, or B & H customer reviews to see what buyers think.
__________________
Drathaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 09:50 PM   #8
4 Rivet Member
 
2016 30' Flying Cloud
Oviedo , Florida
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 262
Images: 1
Everyone will promote what they use, and the subject of choosing a digital camera system is way too complex to lay out in a single post. However, I will say that the current system that is closest to your old G2 experience (other than a mega-buck Leica M240 kit) is one of the Fuji X bodies with a kit of their outstanding prime lenses. The Fuji's are far more "retro" in UI than most other digital cameras. An X-T1 or the new X-Pro2 with 3 or 4 prime lenses is a killer kit that would be most familiar to you from the Contax stuff.

You really need to find a good pro camera shop and go get some hands on with all of the options. You also need to try and define what type of photography you are interested in doing. Certain systems have sweet spots in terms of the genre (and technical attributes required). A high-end DSLR kit from Nikon or Canon is still the most flexible, but it is also the largest, heaviest and most expensive. The mirrorless (non-reflex) systems from Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji and Sony are smaller, lighter, less expensive than pro level DSLR bodies and glass, and offer some unique capabilities as well as some limitations for certain types of photography.
__________________
Keith & Barb
2016 30' Flying Cloud
2016 Ram 2500 diesel
Southeastern Camping Unit, WBCCI #1675
khollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 09:54 PM   #9
Free Range Human
 
Drathaar's Avatar
 
2012 25' FB Flying Cloud
Currently Looking...
Twin Rocks , Oregon
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 709
Images: 4
I concur with the advice to visit a good pro camera shop and look at what's out there.
__________________
Drathaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 09:54 PM   #10
Rivet Master
 
kscherzi's Avatar
 
2013 27' FB International
El Dorado Hills , California
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,136
Images: 24
I have a Canon SLR with several lenses. Heavy and awkward load. Carried them from Europe to Japan. Recently bought a Sony RX-100 IV. Truly excellent little camera with as good quality. The trend is heading away from big SLR's and tons of heavy lens.
__________________
kscherzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 10:07 PM   #11
Silver Hilton
 
Mark Wiltrakis's Avatar
 
1959 24' Tradewind
Astoria , Oregon
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 226
Major Tom -
Your optimum camera choice may depend on what you want to do with it: snapshots, street photography, portraits, landscape, birds in flight, macro. The cameras you list, and their associated lenses, are likely all excellent. But you may or may not be happy over the long run once you are using them. Big cameras today are heavier than big cameras in the film era, and so are lenses. For many, weight is important. (Not for me.) For best image quality, you want to shoot in RAW format (not JPEG) which will require familiarity and skill at digital processing using programs such as Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop. There is a substantial learning curve here, but it is quite rewarding. It requires a time investment. You also need a computer that is up to the task. Slow processing will prove frustrating.
Perhaps you might start out with one of the cameras you list, use it extensively for a few months, and consider renting something very different - such as a full frame (FX) camera and one or more lenses of different focal lengths.
Find a local camera club or photo gallery and make some contacts. There is much to be learned there.
You will be surprised at how good digital photography can be. I've done large format and have spent many hours in a darkroom. I like what I can do today with my digital system substantially better.
I hope you have a similar experience -
Mark
__________________
Mark Wiltrakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 10:28 PM   #12
3 Rivet Member
 
dennis3751's Avatar
 
1976 29' Ambassador
Fitchburg , Wisconsin
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 162
As you did with film choose cameras with good glass with controls that are easy to use and remember. Shooting in RAW format will give you the most flexibility in the digital darkroom. Memory is relatively cheap so even with 20 MB files quite a few images will fit on a card. I really like Adobe Lightroom software since it can help you get the most out of each exposure.
__________________
dennis3751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 11:00 PM   #13
4 Rivet Member
 
Cannonball's Avatar
 
2014 22' FB Sport
San Antonio , Texas
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 488
Images: 1
You may want to check out the recommendations at www.wirecutter.com.


Cannonball, Deep in the Heart of Texas!

WBCCI #4387, Air #84080

Sent from my iPad using Airstream Forums
__________________
Cannonball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 08:41 AM   #14
Rivet Master
 
Hittenstiehl's Avatar

 
1965 24' Tradewind
1962 28' Ambassador
1961 19' Globetrotter
Mesa , Arizona
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,038
Images: 9
Saving for a FujiX myself. Beautiful pictures, good glass, now has an add on lens, nice styling, leather case.

Got Amazon gift cards for Christmas. Gonna save for a year and then go for it.
__________________

__________________

Hittenstiehl
Hittenstiehl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need fireworks photography advice nilesrob Photography 6 06-20-2007 10:55 AM
Photography Rally at the North Rim Boondocker Forum Rallies & Meet Ups 44 05-15-2007 08:27 PM
Newbies - photography fans Dolph Photography 6 03-16-2007 06:26 PM
photography forum anyone? 2airishuman Photography 9 05-13-2006 08:00 PM


Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.