Airstream Chat Room Airstream Links Campground & Product Reviews Airstream Classifieds Airstream Articles Blogs Photo Gallery Forum Listings Portal - Home Page

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Repairing/Replacing Floor &/or Frame



Check out our new sister site AirstreamArticles.com. To contribute an article click here.

Quick Links
- Forum Listings
- Register - it's FREE!
- View Member's Map
- Airstream Articles
- "Live" Chat Room
- View Classifieds
- Post a Classified
- Airstream @ eBay
- Upcoming Rallies
   - Add A Rally
- Rally Discussions
- Repair Discussions
- Search Forums
- Member List
- AIR # Directory
- Member Search
- Profile Photos
- Airstream Photo
- Airstream Links
- Fun & Games
- WBCCI Websites
- WBCCI Unit Forums
- Courtesy Parking
- Campgrounds
- Support & FAQs
- Community Policies
- Helpers Needed




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2007, 08:47 PM   #1
Rivet Master

Ganglin's Avatar

Profile:  1971 27' Overlander
Gahanna , Ohio
Posts: 1,096
Images: 10

POR versus Eastwood

Thought I'd post this a food for thought. All of the classic car folks at work prefer Eastwood.....

Eastwood Co. - Rust Encapsulator vs. POR 15
__________________
OHIO - WE ARE THE MOTHER SHIP

Gary
Ganglin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 09:45 PM   #2
Moderator

CanoeStream's Avatar
Profile:  2006 25' Safari FB SE
St. Cloud , Minnesota
Posts: 6,807
Images: 13

Thanks Gary. I hope this gets some attention - discussion and folks trying it out, then reporting back.
__________________
Bob
CanoeStream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 10:26 PM   #3
Rivet Master

safari57's Avatar
Profile:  1951 21' Flying Cloud
West Coast , BC
Posts: 2,916
Images: 4

Thanks Ganglin.

An interesting article and worth knowing.

I've shared this with a number of the folks in my car club - most of us are somewhere along the path with hot rods and customs and we've all used POR 15. A consideration for most of my group is that POR 15 is available at virtually all of our parts suppliers where Eastwood's products are carried by only a couple and they don't give our club members the same level of discount. I also know if I'm short a bit I can call up one of the buds and "borrow" a bit of what they have on the shelf without having to go buy more. Of course we could order it directly from Eastwood but that would mean we'd have to be pro-active and that word would never be used to describe anyone of our car club group.

I wonder if the Eastwood product comes off exposed skin any quicker than POR 15? Now that would make my wife a bit happier.

Barry
__________________
Barry & Donna
Life is short - so's the door on an Flying Cloud (ouch)
1951 Flying Cloud 21'
1957 Pontiac Safari 2dr wagon TV
safari57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 03:48 PM   #4
1 Rivet Member
Profile:  Lenore , Idaho
Posts: 9
Images: 51

There is a debate going on over at the Ford truck site: Which is better, Por-15 or Rust Bullet. Long story short, Por-15 requires that you use three of their products for it to work: degreaser,etcher, and finally paint where as with the Rust Bullet you just use the paint (on a clean surface of course) which translates to much cheaper
heybaby1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 04:32 PM   #5
Rivet Master

Jim & Susan's Avatar

Profile:  1973 27' Overlander
McDonough , Georgia
Posts: 3,155
Images: 37

Gary, I actually read that article when trying to decide which product to use. Ultimately, POR went on the frame in areas that were not exposed to sunlight. I used the Eastwood product on the areas that needed to be silver in color for the simple reason that I didn't want to paint over the POR.

I have to tell you, I'm not pleased with the Eastwood product. Within a month, I had small amouts of surface rust showing up. I had to reapply in those areas. The tongue looks pretty good. The tail of the Airstream came out ok. I haven't checked closely recently. Maybe I should go back and have a closer look at it.

And yes, I was very careful to apply both products according to the instructions that came with it. I have a little more information over in my "Full Monte" thread.

Jim
__________________
E=MC˛ (and stuff)

www.nesa.org

Air No. 6427
Jim & Susan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:14 PM   #6
Rivet Master

Alumatube's Avatar

Profile:  Jefferson , Arkansas
Posts: 986

Clint Eastwood can take POR-15 any day of the week!

Susan
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"

1984 310 Limited Motor Home "The Rockin' A"
1974 31' Excella (soon-to-be carhauler)
1974 20' Argosy Motor Home
Alumatube is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:21 PM   #7
Rivet Master

safari57's Avatar
Profile:  1951 21' Flying Cloud
West Coast , BC
Posts: 2,916
Images: 4

Thanks Jim for the heads up on your experience.

Basically it would appear that the jury is still out on which way to go, but in my own case to be on the safe side I'll stick with POR15 for now.

Thanks
Barry
__________________
Barry & Donna
Life is short - so's the door on an Flying Cloud (ouch)
1951 Flying Cloud 21'
1957 Pontiac Safari 2dr wagon TV
safari57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 05:23 PM   #8
Rivet Master

safari57's Avatar
Profile:  1951 21' Flying Cloud
West Coast , BC
Posts: 2,916
Images: 4

Susan

My wife watched a whole swack of Clint Eastwood movies that were on the satelite station this weekend and I asked her if he was dead or something.

She said Clint can't die as can readily be seen by how he comes out of all the movies - I think they were mostly dusters which she likes.

I was just wondering if you were also glued to the Clint-a-thon this weekend to come up with a statement like that.

Barry
__________________
Barry & Donna
Life is short - so's the door on an Flying Cloud (ouch)
1951 Flying Cloud 21'
1957 Pontiac Safari 2dr wagon TV
safari57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 06:17 PM   #9
Rivet Master

Alumatube's Avatar

Profile:  Jefferson , Arkansas
Posts: 986

No, not a huge Clint fan but think he's okay. The topic just instantly made me think of Clint giving a can of POR-15 a big dent.

That's funny about your wife's reply! Clint will never die!

I did like Pale Rider, but mostly because of the horse...

Susan
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"

1984 310 Limited Motor Home "The Rockin' A"
1974 31' Excella (soon-to-be carhauler)
1974 20' Argosy Motor Home
Alumatube is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:48 AM   #10
4 Rivet Member

Wabbiteer's Avatar
Profile:  1973 27' Overlander
1972 29' Ambassador
Twin Mosquitos , Minnesota
Posts: 490
Images: 2

My '73 used an asphalt-based frame paint and neither Eastwood or POR will bond though it, and solvents will NOT easily chase it off, using a high speed rotary wire brush to strip it off (have magnetic sweeper before you start) and a solvent wash 'n wipe and the OEM frame paint still persists... If it aint rusted already you can use most anything to try and preserve the OEM coating - I found Rustoleum flat black merges with it nicely.

Anyhow, I read the link, which I quit reading when I spotted the first flaw - the writer waiting 15-20 minutes for the second coat; the instructions are pretty clear you should wait until the 1st coat sets hard enough that when brushing your fingertip across it there should be just a slight grab or drag from the hardening but 'dry' film; the time is variable depending on temperature and humidity. 3-5 hours seemed right last painting I did, so with such a large error built in the remaining dialog was meaningless...

I can hear Clint asking, where there 15 minutes passed or 150 minutes passed, you feel lucky?

From POR-15 summary PDF on spray application:
Quote:
In order to form a complete anchor, apply the second coat immediately after verifying the dryness condition of the first coat by touch after 1-2 hours have passed.
__________________
Powered by Tinnitus
RE & Alt Energy Hope Chest
RE Forums
Wabbiteer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 04:28 PM   #11
1 Rivet Member
Profile:  1994 34' Limited
colebrook , Connecticut
Posts: 9

I have not used either product. So I can't compare them to anything.
I do use Permetex Extend. I have found it to be easy to apply, converts the rust to a durable black finish.

I used it on my old 48 Ply that I drove to work each day on salty roads. It stopped all the orginal rust and prevented further, I had the old car for 8 years.

I does not come off the hands by any methods known other than wear.
malett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 10:41 PM   #12
3 Rivet Member

Hippo's Avatar
Profile:  Currently Looking...
Battle Ground , Washington
Posts: 182
Images: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganglin
Thought I'd post this a food for thought. All of the classic car folks at work prefer Eastwood.....

Eastwood Co. - Rust Encapsulator vs. POR 15
Gary,
POR works great. A friend was restoring an old car. He painted the parts left them outside overnight the next day they were dry. You could not beat the finish off with a hammer. Really good stuff.
Hippo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 06:23 PM   #13
2 Rivet Member

Jetstreamer's Avatar
Profile:  La Follette , Tennessee
Posts: 22

I used POR 15 on my Studebaker Champ pickup, yes the very same one in Garth Brooks "Wrapped up in you" video. 5 years ago I used it on the rain gutters and sprayed top coat on it while it was still wet. It held up outside 24/7 for about 4 years. Fall of 2005 I re-did it using Eastwoods rust encapsulator and the same can of topcoat. It didn't last the winter outside. It looked as if it vaporized with only a trace of it remaining. Good news is I have room inside for the old Champ.

Regards,

Kevin
Jetstreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4x4 versus 4x2 Tow Vehicle BeBop Tow Vehicles 40 11-24-2007 04:57 PM
06 versus 07 Diesel TVs Streamer1 Tow Vehicles 24 11-22-2006 06:38 AM
God versus Computor... canny_banjo_man Off Topic Forum 2 03-04-2006 11:57 AM
Airstream versus SOB Princer Our Community 9 11-13-2004 08:24 PM
Airstream-Eastwood Action Kistler Our Community 6 01-12-2003 07:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement
Airstream Trailer Forum - Aquarium & Reef Forum
Royal Forum - Book and Reader Forum - Yoga Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Yoga Forum
Interference - U2, Pop Culture & Social Responsibility
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.

eXTReMe Tracker

Other recommended Airstream sites:
Airstream Forums - Airstream Classifieds - Airstream Articles
Airstream Central - Airstream Photos