Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nuvite-F [IMG]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Harriet/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image001.gif[/IMG] 1.Uh, Tom. . .
2.And finally, the Hearing Board had the authority to uphold or reverse Bob Thompson's suspension, but aside from that, NO AUTHORITY TO ORDER ANYBODY TO DO ANYTHING. Section 4 of the Bylaws gives the Hearing Board this power, and no other. I think it was nice of the Hearing Board to include an apology in their written opinion, but they had no authority to order it be published or anything else. Wrong!!!
Sec. 4. F. Upon conclusion of any such hearing, the hearing board, by resolution, shall render a
judgmentin writing based upon the written record and upon the evidence presented to it at such hearing.
Such judgment may affirm, overrule or modify any judgment previously taken on the complaint and any such judgment so rendered shall be
final and conclusive. Thus the Appeals Board did in fact have full authority to order it's Judgment to be Published in the BB. Also read the fine print in the RONR and it Supports the Boards action and decisions (Judgment).
So this whole Bob Thompson--No Apology thread has never had any legal or factual basis, and it's time to lay it to rest. If you are an attorney, go back to law school, if not don’t attempt to practice law with a license. As to the facts, it is suggested you read the other Bob Thompson thread or read SaveWally.org on the same subject. Bob is only part of the story. There are others and the problem continues. 
Quick Links
Hybrid Mode
