Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-26-2011, 04:51 PM   #225
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwightdi View Post
Do we have a policy manual now?
No
Quote:
What is the savings if we just move some of the Bylaws over to a new "policy manual"?
Don't follow that question.

Quote:
Who gets to write and approve the policy manual? How is the policy manual any different than the Bylaws?
It could be you! if you vote yes.

Difference, my take is a policy manual is akin to hand book, not laws as in bylaws.


.
__________________

__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 05:15 PM   #226
Rivet Master
 
1977 31' Sovereign
1963 26' Overlander
1989 34' Excella
Johnsburg , Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,941
You used another weasel word "could". It is more likely the IBT or EC7 will be the only ones to write and approve such a handbook. There would be no $ savings in having another section called "Handbook" in the current "Bluebook". It is just a distraction, like changing the word "Region" to "Area". These are old politician's or magician's trick. It sure looks like there is still a lot of loose ends in what the committee is proposing and no one, except possibly the EC7, knows how it will really turn out. They and inner circle are the only ones that really control what can happen. It will take a change in attitude, from control to stewardship, for any meaningful changes in how the club operates. There are a lot of Region 1st and 2nd VP's that have been standing in line waiting to be president that will be sourly disappointed, if we reduce the number of "areas" and free lunches.
__________________

__________________
dwightdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 05:16 PM   #227
Rivet Master
 
wkerfoot's Avatar
 
1979 23' Safari
1954 29' Liner
Orange , California
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,667
Bob,

Your math indicates that there will be seven fewer regions. Is that your assumption or something in the new bylaws?

Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by LI Pets View Post
Tom is this what you were getting at?

a. International President $8,625.00
b. International First Vice-President $5,250.00
c. International Second Vice-President $5,025.00
d. International Third Vice President $4,875.00
e. International Recording Secretary $2,665.00
f. International Treasurer $2,660.00
g. Immediate Past President $300.00
h. Region President For the year 2010-2011, $1,178.00. x 12 = $14,136
i. Region Vice Presidents For the year 2010-2011, $612.00. x 12 = $7,344

Current budget $50,880

In the Revised Constitution those costs would decrease immediately
no 3vp $4,875 and less regions/areas about 8246/4284 or $17,405

Reducing the travel as it is now totaling $50,880 to $33,475 or 35%

Vote no it stays at 50K


.
__________________
Bill Kerfoot, WBCCI/VAC/CAC/El Camino Real Unit #5223
Just my personal opinion
1973 Dodge W200 PowerWagon, 1977 Lincoln Continental, 2014 Dodge Durango
1979 23' Safari, and 1954 29' Double Door Liner Orange, CA

http://billbethsblog.blogspot.com/
wkerfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 06:21 PM   #228
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkerfoot View Post
Bob,

Your math indicates that there will be seven fewer regions. Is that your assumption or something in the new bylaws?
Bill since there isn't yet a new set of Bylaws (on paper) it is my assumption based upon what I believe to be a theory to equalize the number of members within each area/region.

A balance of power so to speak, several numbers have been tossed around as low as 5 - 8 most often, it's not the committees task to propose the number.


.
__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 06:26 PM   #229
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwightdi View Post
You used another weasel word "could". It is more likely the IBT or EC7 will be the only ones to write and approve such a handbook.
That may be true perhaps not.



Seriously, it can be within the members control rather than the IBT.



.
__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 06:43 PM   #230
Rivet Master
 
wkerfoot's Avatar
 
1979 23' Safari
1954 29' Liner
Orange , California
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,667
If you are correct, then there would be 5 Area officer votes to 7 International officer votes, correct?

Also the Area officers would have a larger area to cover, without an increase in travel reimbursement or a decrease in responsibilities, won't that make it more difficult to recruit officers.

Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by LI Pets View Post
Bill since there isn't yet a new set of Bylaws (on paper) it is my assumption based upon what I believe to be a theory to equalize the number of members within each area/region.

A balance of power so to speak, several numbers have been tossed around as low as 5 - 8 most often, it's not the committees task to propose the number.


.
__________________
Bill Kerfoot, WBCCI/VAC/CAC/El Camino Real Unit #5223
Just my personal opinion
1973 Dodge W200 PowerWagon, 1977 Lincoln Continental, 2014 Dodge Durango
1979 23' Safari, and 1954 29' Double Door Liner Orange, CA

http://billbethsblog.blogspot.com/
wkerfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 07:47 PM   #231
Rivet Master
 
Gene's Avatar
 
2008 25' Safari FB SE
Grand Junction , Colorado
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,840
There is from time to time discussion on one man/one vote vs. representative democracy. This has been an issue in governments and organizations for many years and the arguments have been made over and over.

I like the idea of everyone gets to participate and to vote, but in practice it doesn't work so well. Well, maybe it works in the classic example, the New England town meeting.

I used to be involved in an organization with 3,000+ members around western Colorado. This was a group committed to democracy in principle. Yet, at the annual meeting where most members lived within less than 100 miles, 65-75 members would show up. That's around 2.3%. The board was characterized by grey hair (so were many of the attendees too) and pleas to the members to run for the board fell on deaf ears. This was depressing.

On the other hand, lots of organizations use mail ballots. I recently got my Consumer Reports ballot—another organization that says it's devoted to democracy. There are exactly the number of candidates as there are board slots. I don't remember ever being given the opportunity to nominate anyone.

I think everyone knows how low voter turnout is in US state, local and national elections. Ironically, before registration was required in the late 19th Century, Americans voted in very, very high numbers. Registration made it harder to vote and probably cleaned up the process, but reduced participation. A number of states seem to be making even hard to register and vote lately.

Someday maybe we will all be able to get in front of our computers or wrist radios and vote at once, but would that make it better?

The fact is most people don't seem to care about who runs anything, or if they do, they don't act on it. This allows a minority to take control and further limit who runs things.

I believe representative democracy works to provide more knowledgeable people in control but there have to be strong limits on their distorting things to prevent them from making the organization serve only them. Secondly, there have to be affirmative efforts to recruit more people to run for office and make sure those efforts are not subverted. It should be easy to run for office, but if 150 people run for each office, how can we tell who is best? That needs work. Those are the principles that may make for a better organization and if the proposed changes do not do that, maybe they are not the answer. Delegates will have to decide what version of the proposals or the present document make the most sense, and if none do, then try again I guess.

Gene
__________________
Gene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 08:21 PM   #232
Rivet Master
 
rideair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,223
The $$$$ problem in the WBCCI could be fix in two seconds if only the "good people of the IBT/EC7" would do so. It does not "require" a re-write of the Constitution.

1. All that has to be done is for the IBT/EC7 to say, we will cut "all" travel except for "searching for a site" (searching should be limited to 2 people) and "attending" the International Rally and will be paid by the mile to do so.

They (The IBT) has the power to change the Bylaws to do this NOW!!!

This is not real hard people! It just requires the ones "in power" to do the right thing!

How hard is that?
__________________
Paul Waddell
rideair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 09:01 PM   #233
Rivet Master
 
Coloradobus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 784
Nice idea, Paul. but do you believe they ( EC-7) would really cut their own feed sack?
In our "other" RV club, we have one indiiviual who controls the show. He, then, delegates the work for finding a rally site to members who live in the area that is chosen. We have one national rally a year setup this way, and rest of the "mini" rallies are thought out and executed by those who just want a rally. This works fine as well. Granted, our numbers aren't as large as WBCCi.
__________________
JIM n CHRIS
"62 ATW Overlander, '51 Flying Cloud
'67 GT, '90 Squarestream 29ft, 06 Bambi, Bigfoot slide in/GMC Denali K2500, Marathon Coach, Class A.
Coloradobus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 06:22 AM   #234
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkerfoot View Post
If you are correct, then there would be 5 Area officer votes to 7 International officer votes, correct?

Bill
No the President only votes in a tie situation.

The Revision proposes that the past IP status be ex officio, no vote.

They would then have 5 votes rather than 7.
__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 06:39 AM   #235
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by rideair View Post
The $$$$ problem in the WBCCI could be fix in two seconds

1. All that has to be done is for the IBT/EC7 to say, we will cut "all" travel except for "searching for a site" (searching should be limited to 2 people) and "attending" the International Rally and will be paid by the mile to do so.

How hard is that?
Hard to believe the financial problems rest solely in the travel expenses.

But right not hard, the Revision reduces that from $50K to $32K or a 35% savings.

Secondly the EC6 shouldn't be doing site selections, an event planner should be retained to do it less expensively and likely better.


.
__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 07:12 AM   #236
2 Rivet Member
 
1959 18' "Footer"
1968 30' Sovereign
1988 29' Excella
Appleton , Wisconsin
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 36
Just a note on the club's accounting of travel expenses. The cost of the "special" advance caravan to the next international rally site traveling from the recently completed international rally is not included in the allowances that have been quoted. This is a separate general ledger account and there are no limitations to expense amounts. This account will also include any travel by the international officers, committee chairman, etc. that could be associated with planning an international rally.

One other account that holds travel expenses not restricted by the bylaws is "advertising". In the past, this account has held travel expenses of international officers to attend trade shows, RV shows with the purpose of promoting the WBCCI.
__________________
redwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 07:36 AM   #237
Rivet Master
 
1977 31' Sovereign
1963 26' Overlander
1989 34' Excella
Johnsburg , Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,941
How many new members do they sign up at the trade shows? Advance International planning and travel should come out of the International "pot" not the General fund.
__________________
dwightdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 08:48 AM   #238
Silver Mist
 
LI Pets's Avatar
 
1977 31' Sovereign
Riverhead , New York
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,008
Images: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwightdi View Post
Advance International planning and travel should come out of the International "pot" not the General fund.
I like that idea
__________________

__________________
Bob
'77 Sovereign Intl 31' CB
WBCCI R2 Rep VAC 11411 Metro NY VP

LI Pets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
wbcci forum


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unit Constitution and By Laws Updates grannyred WBCCI Forum 5 09-03-2008 07:17 PM
Results of Constitution Amendment Unknown? Cracker WBCCI Forum 17 08-09-2007 11:40 AM
WBCCI Constitutional Amendment wallybyam WBCCI Forum 26 04-13-2007 09:04 AM


Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.