Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiny16
Dave
I don't get where your going with this. Unfortunately rules are in place for the 10 percenters who need them. I'm sure your dog is well behaved. How would you like it if he encountered someone's not so well behaved unleashed pit bull? Do you think he would stand a chance?
|
Where I'm going with this is that I'm willing to take the chance that I can protect my dog off leash, knowing that I may not be able to do that, the same as I'm willing to take the chance that I can protect myself off leash, knowing that I may not be able to do that either. The perception of the people in Vigo was that dogs were normal occupants of the sidewalks, the same as people. There was a sense of peacefulness and acceptance of dogs in Vigo that is absent here. In two weeks in Vigo, I observed no incidences of problems with dogs off leash on the sidewalks. Probably there were some that I didn't observe.
Of course, during the day you referenced in Hong Kong, you didn't notice any incidences of violence between people, either. In fact (averaging from yearly statistics) in Hong Kong that day there were 30 incidences of violence between people, a 36 year low. I'm sure there were more than that in New York. Perhaps we could reduce that if people were better controlled?
I really don't see why laws pertaining to dogs should be different from laws pertaining to human beings. It is against the law for human beings to attack each other. They do anyway, and yet we go about our business playing the odds and hoping we aren't attacked. The odds are low enough that we don't worry about it that much. I have walked around the blocks in my neighborhood with Lupe off leash thousands of times in the 5 years since I've had her, and she has had countless encounters with other dogs, none resulting in violence. If I said the same thing about walks with my wife, it wouldn't even be worth commenting on, but somehow with Lupe, it is.
Why?