Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-14-2012, 04:07 PM   #1
New Member
 
2001 19' Bambi
Galveston , Texas
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Towing: Ridgeline vs. Dodge Durango

Hi,

I am new to this forum and just purchased a 2001 Bambi to replace my 2009 Casita. I currently have a Honda Ridgeline towing vechile with a V6 250 hp, 245 ft. lbs. of torque and a 5000 lb towing capacity. I will be towing the Bambi in the mountains around Denver and need to get over the continental divide. The Casita had a GAWR of 3500 lbs and the Bambi comes in around 4300 lb. GAWR. The Ridgeline had no problem with the mountains with the Casita, but I expect I will need to upgrade the towing vechile to something more capable with the heavier Bambi. I am thinking of a Dodge Durango V6 with 290 hp, 260 torque and 6200 lb of towing capacity. Will this be a sufficient step up in towing capacity?

Thanks in advance for any insight.

Jos
__________________

__________________
jpwrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 04:56 PM   #2
Rivet Master
 
Globie64's Avatar
 
1964 19' Globetrotter
The Sea Ranch , California
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,307
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 3
Hi, too bad about the Ridgline- they're great, we have one, but tow with a Tundra because it was the newer vechicle. Curious, why the Durango? I've been looking at the Nissan Frontier V6, has among the best towing acceleration towing 5000# to 60mph and I think it'd be a better truck than the Dodge in terms of build and reliability. We tow our 2850# Globetrotter with the V6 Tundra, it's okay at speed but labors on hills, the kind of hills we have here in nor cal.
__________________

__________________
Wherever you go, there you are
Globie64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 05:41 PM   #3
Rivet Master
 
Road Ruler's Avatar
 
1973 23' Safari
St. Catharines , South Western Ontario
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,183
Images: 41
I have little doubt your Ridge will easily handle the Bambi assuming you are connected properly. Many may speculate it would perform as good or better than the Durango in many ways. Have a look at what Ridgeline owners are towing.... Ridgeline's can tow (photos) - Honda Ridgeline Owners Club Forums
__________________
Airstreams..... The best towing trailers on the planet!
Road Ruler is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 07:45 PM   #4
Rivet Master
 
2006 22' International CCD
2007 Base Camp
Quesnel , British Columbia
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
I'd look at other options... A Durango isn't much of a step up really, but it does get you into a rear-drive full-frame 'real' truck. The mileage isn't really that much better than V8 motors, especially when you are towing.

If you like the Durango though, it will easily do the trick.
__________________
Friday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 07:47 PM   #5
Moderator
 
moosetags's Avatar

 
2015 25' FB Flying Cloud
2012 23' FB Flying Cloud
2005 25' Safari
Santa Rosa Beach , Florida
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,130
Images: 5
Greetings from the Florida Panhandle

Welcome to the Forums. We're glad to have you with us. I believe that the Honda will handle the Bambi just fine.

Brian
__________________
SuEllyn & Brian McCabe
WBCCI #3628 -- AIR #14872 -- TAC #FL-7
2012 FC 23' FB (Lucy) with HAHA
2005 Suburban 2500 Quadrasteer (Olivia) & 2011 Silverado 3500 (Fred) with Outfitter Truck Camper (Ethel)
moosetags is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 08:04 PM   #6
Rivet Master
 
Globie64's Avatar
 
1964 19' Globetrotter
The Sea Ranch , California
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,307
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 3
Regarding full frame, the Ridgeline is unibody with a full ladder frame. We've used ours for 105k, hauling construction materials without a problem.
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are
Globie64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 08:22 PM   #7
Rivet Master
 
MrUKToad's Avatar

 
2011 28' International
Chatham , Ontario
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,231
Images: 17
Blog Entries: 13
As Road Ruler says, connect it up properly and the Ridgeline will do the job for you.
__________________
Steve; also known as Mr UK Toad

"You can't tow that with that!"

http://toadsoftowedhaul.weebly.com/blog---2014.html
MrUKToad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 09:43 PM   #8
Rivet Master
 
2006 22' International CCD
2007 Base Camp
Quesnel , British Columbia
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globie64 View Post
Regarding full frame, the Ridgeline is unibody with a full ladder frame. We've used ours for 105k, hauling construction materials without a problem.
I'm thinking more about the rear-wheel drive for towing rather than the front-drive of the Ridgeline. Proper WD setup would be important for a front-drive vehicle.

The Ridgeline is a compelling package for a soft-roader.
__________________
Friday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2012, 10:56 PM   #9
Rivet Master
 
1974 Argosy 20
2014 20' Flying Cloud
Kooskia , Idaho
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,129
The new Chrysler Pentastar V6 looks to be a very good engine in all ways. I have seen nothing but favorable reports on it. It is a higher RPM engine than many are used to, but designed for that higher RPM and still excellent durability.

I believe Chrysler ditched 7 different V6's that they were producing, and now are using the Pentastar in virtually everything. So, it had to be smooth, tough, and economical. Shees I sound like I work for them... I don't. And of course, when I got my new Grand Cherokee, I went with the old Hemi V8...lol.
__________________
idroba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 06:22 AM   #10
New Member
 
2001 19' Bambi
Galveston , Texas
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks to all of you for your replies. They are helpful.

Would a hitch store or a particular commercial organization be able to comment on the specifics of the adequacy of the Durango V6? I know that the Durango comes with an optional "hemi" V8 engine that should easily do the job, but I would to like to buy the smaller V6 290 hp 260 ft torque one because 95% of the time I will be driving w/o the Bambi 19' on level coastal Texas roads. The difference in the two Durango engines according to the government statistics comes to about $700/year or 23 miles per gallon on the highway for the V6 vs 20 MPG for the V8

Unless I can get a definitive answer I may need get real life experience of trying to drag the Bambi up the mountains of the 10,000 foot Berthoud Pass to see if the Ridgeline is up to the job, and if, not approach a car dealer in Denver to see if they will let me test drive a Durango with the V6 engine to see if it is satisfactory.

Again thanks for all of your comments.

Jos
__________________
jpwrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 08:54 AM   #11
Rivet Master
 
Ahab's Avatar

 
2008 22' Safari
Oracle , Arizona
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,036
We go above 10,000' routinely, towing our 22' without any problems. Don't see why you think you should have.
__________________
Ahab is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 08:55 AM   #12
Vintage Kin
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Corpus Christi , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,562
Images: 1
The tow vehicle that is also best for solo, non-towing driving is usually the best choice when hitch rigging can be made ideal. Compromising 95% of annual miles economy for a once-annual difficulty of a few minutes is contraindicated.

You haven't defined "satisfactory". It wouldn't bother me to be "slow" up a mountain pass. And no one would have been towing trailers in the 1960's if it was a concern either.

You'd want to find out the percentage difference in annual average EPA mpg between the vehicles considered. That is the closest indicator, not exclusively highway or city numbers.
__________________
1990 35' Silver Streak Sterling; 9k GVWR.
2004 DODGE Cummins 305/555; 6-manual; 9k GVWR.
Hensley Arrow. 15-cpm solo, 25-cpm towing
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 05:14 PM   #13
Rivet Master
 
Globie64's Avatar
 
1964 19' Globetrotter
The Sea Ranch , California
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,307
Images: 18
Blog Entries: 3
I agree with Rednax. I don't want/won't buy something that is going to get dreadful mileage 100% to be able to tow effortlessly 2% of the time.

Friday, I'm curious about you're not wanting to use the front-biased awd Ridgeline for towing. Is it that the front wheel traction is reduced from the tongue weight at the rear? We're contemplating setting up the Ridgeline to tow because the work truck is usually disgusting and no fun to travel in! Our Globetrotter is about 3300# fully laden, and the Ridgeline is rated for 5000#. You can lock all four wheels together, but I don't think you can/ want to drive like that, at speed and on pavement
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are
Globie64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 06:04 PM   #14
3 Rivet Member
 
Sodbust's Avatar
 
1972 27' Overlander
Penokee , Kansas
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 229
Ok,, the EPA stickers tell a different story than what one deals with in the real world.. The v6 is a great little engine if its just pushing a SUV around,.. but real world everyone I talk too is getting better overall fuel MPG with the 5.7 hemi loaded or unloaded..

You have to remember under a light load it cuts back to become a 4cyl engine..

I have one in a full sized 4x4 pu,, and empty am always bumping 20mpg... Towing our 27' Overlander runs at 14 mpg..

Sodbust
__________________

__________________
2012 Ram 1500 Tradesman Hemi, 4x4, 6 speed

20mpg empty, 14 mpg with 27' Overlander.

Today is the first day of the rest of your life!
Sodbust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.
Modal Click