|
|
01-27-2018, 08:46 PM
|
#21
|
3 Rivet Member
2014 19' International
Port Townsend
, Washington
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 184
|
Though I was reluctant to make the switch from the Highlander to the 150, and did so dragging my feet (actually my wife wanted us to have the truck), it is great, even without the AS, which is 75%+ of the time. It is quite comfortable and rides nice, but still love the Highlander.
|
|
|
01-28-2018, 01:40 AM
|
#22
|
4 Rivet Member
2004 22' Safari
Albuquerque
, New Mexico
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 374
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LBelle
Though I was reluctant to make the switch from the Highlander to the 150, and did so dragging my feet (actually my wife wanted us to have the truck), it is great, even without the AS, which is 75%+ of the time. It is quite comfortable and rides nice, but still love the Highlander.
|
It is hard to beat the Highlander for comfort traveling, but it has limitations towing a bigger vehicle, so unless you keep the Highlander for a daily driver, you could get a smaller trailer initially, and risk needing to upgrade both the TV and trailer at the same time... or get the bigger trailer and upgrade the tow vehicle when it is time. (some find the 16 adequate, but i think they are a minority). My wife and I have a 22 Safari (no pets) and we find it just adequate for our needs but could not survive a smaller trailer. We like the rear kitchen space, so it would be tough to give it up, even for more room and twin beds.
If you are still working, I would recommend to most folks in a situation like this to get the bigger trailer and upgrade the TV down the road (put some serious money into a good WD hitch.) I bought my trailer three years before I retired and didn't get many nights in the trailer for the first couple of years. After I retired, I got 80 nights in the trailer and tripled my tow mileage. In my case I upgraded the tow vehicle right away after I bought the trailer, but only because the full sized Bronco I had sported an awfully short wheelbase.
|
|
|
01-28-2018, 12:33 PM
|
#23
|
1 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
Burlington
, Vermont
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver.Sanctuary
It is hard to beat the Highlander for comfort traveling, but it has limitations towing a bigger vehicle, so unless you keep the Highlander for a daily driver, you could get a smaller trailer initially, and risk needing to upgrade both the TV and trailer at the same time... or get the bigger trailer and upgrade the tow vehicle when it is time. (some find the 16 adequate, but i think they are a minority). My wife and I have a 22 Safari (no pets) and we find it just adequate for our needs but could not survive a smaller trailer. We like the rear kitchen space, so it would be tough to give it up, even for more room and twin beds.
If you are still working, I would recommend to most folks in a situation like this to get the bigger trailer and upgrade the TV down the road (put some serious money into a good WD hitch.) I bought my trailer three years before I retired and didn't get many nights in the trailer for the first couple of years. After I retired, I got 80 nights in the trailer and tripled my tow mileage. In my case I upgraded the tow vehicle right away after I bought the trailer, but only because the full sized Bronco I had sported an awfully short wheelbase.
|
Thanks Silver Sanctuary.
There are always trade offs to consider.
You have put it all together & made it easy to think about with excellent advice.
After feedback and a quick review in the archives. It appears that the majority do move on from a 16ft. You look at the profile info on the left and it seems they now have a larger trailer from their initial 16ft trailer.
I also have a fairly large dog (afghan sight hound) which I overlooked...to consider.
I don't want to have false economies, but being I only purchased my Highlander a few years ago, I prefer not to swap it out. Also thinking, the 22 sport with Highlander set up could be fairly economical to tow, store & maintain.
Possibly not the ideal set up, not sure, but seems to work for some so worth trying it out to see for myself.
I looked at used units online, but the pricing (or they are in poor condition) is so close to new that it does not seem the value is there.
|
|
|
01-28-2018, 02:15 PM
|
#24
|
1 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
Burlington
, Vermont
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 11
|
Last thoughts...thinking, ultimately the sweet spot may be a bit longer than 22ft.
Will need to try to see.
Maybe postpone purchase, to get the right fit: trailer & matching TV
|
|
|
01-28-2018, 04:58 PM
|
#25
|
2 Rivet Member
2018 28' Tommy Bahama
2017 23' Flying Cloud
2014 16' Sport
New York
, New York
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldExplorer
Last thoughts...thinking, ultimately the sweet spot may be a bit longer than 22ft.
Will need to try to see.
Maybe postpone purchase, to get the right fit: trailer & matching TV
|
It’s best to get the trailer you want, though you won’t be able to tow a 23+ with the highlander.
Also, I’m not sure where in VT you live, but I wouldn’t classify either side of rt. 4 around Rutland as “rolling hills” that particular area of the state rivals anything you will find out west.
|
|
|
01-28-2018, 07:05 PM
|
#26
|
1 Rivet Member
Currently Looking...
Burlington
, Vermont
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattskav
It’s best to get the trailer you want, though you won’t be able to tow a 23+ with the highlander.
Also, I’m not sure where in VT you live, but I wouldn’t classify either side of rt. 4 around Rutland as “rolling hills” that particular area of the state rivals anything you will find out west.
|
True.
I'll need to revise what I drive if I go longer.
Better to buy once if possible.
Used if going longer.
Yes can be hilly 😀 Overlooked a few spots.
|
|
|
03-03-2018, 07:05 PM
|
#27
|
3 Rivet Member
2018 19' Flying Cloud
Eugene
, Oregon
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 220
|
Highlander as TV
I just came across this thread and a couple of things stood out to me. People have mentioned a 19' or 20' would be the highest they would recommend with the Highlander ( XLE 5,000 lbs tow rating) but ironically the 22' Sport has a lower base weight and hitch weight than the 19' Flying Cloud. The 19 footer would definitely be close to maxing out the Highlander (especially the hitch weight) but I would think the 22' much less so.
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 09:13 PM
|
#28
|
Rivet Master
2022 25' Flying Cloud
NCR
, Ontario
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 3,107
|
the 22 FB is only 7.5 feet wide, most other are 8 - 8.5 feet
thus the 22fb is much easier to tow than models that are smaller and lighter, but wider
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|