Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Restoration, Repair & Parts Forums > Towing, Tow Vehicles & Hitches
Click Here to Login
Register Vendors FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Log in

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-15-2015, 09:30 AM   #1
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Franklin Div Coupling

The coupling on my 1982 Excella simply states Franklin Div. Class 4 64410200. When I look online for Franklin, I can find no information on the company. Does anyone know something about Franklin? Is the mfg or it a subsidiary of a larger company?
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 10:03 AM   #2
Rivet Master
 
1981 31' Excella II
New Market , Alabama
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,145
You mean the part the ball fits in? At the front of the A-Frame?

Perry
perryg114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 06:29 AM   #3
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Franklin Div Coupling

The Franklin Div and the Class 4 is just in front of the hole for the power jack and the number is on the street side of the coupling just be hide the part that holds the ball
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2015, 06:47 AM   #4
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Franklin was/is a division of Attwood. Repair parts are available.
88050 264565 2” LATCH REPAIR KIT FOR FRANKLIN 64-4103/ATWOOD MARVEL 88000 88061 264576 2 5/16” LATCH REPAIR KIT FOR FRANKLIN 64-4102/ATWOOD MARVEL 88007
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 04:35 AM   #5
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Franklin Div Coupling

Thanks for the information. I was looking at buying an Anderson wd system that is not compatible with several models of the attwood couplings.
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 07:07 AM   #6
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
You should have no compatibility issues with the very effective and affordable Andersen WD System. In fact there is not one documented case of a trailer separating from the tow vehicle while on the road and using the Andersen WD system contrary to what one member here keeps parroting.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 10:00 AM   #7
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Franklin Div Coupling

I just received a reply from Atwood. They said that this was their Marvel style coupling and that did not want the WD system used because it would cause force to be applied to the ball clamp and cause undue wear on the coupler.
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 10:25 AM   #8
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Mantua , Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,062
Blog Entries: 2
Did they mean any WD system or only the Anderson?
xrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 06:24 AM   #9
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
MY Bambi II had a Marvel coupler. It was 50 years old. I used an Andersen WD system on it for for three years with no noticeable additional wear. I went as far as buying a coupler rebuilt kit. I left it unused in the trailer when sold.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 07:01 AM   #10
4 Rivet Member
 
Livingston , Texas
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMarugg View Post
Thanks for the information. I was looking at buying an Anderson wd system that is not compatible with several models of the attwood couplings.
Current Related Thread on Open Roads Forum

Photos of Ball Wear

Ron
Ron Gratz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 07:29 AM   #11
Rivet Master
 
Currently Looking...
Mantua , Ohio
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,062
Blog Entries: 2
Interesting, thanks for the info.
xrvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 08:02 AM   #12
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Coupling

Quote:
Originally Posted by avionstream View Post
Did they mean any WD system or only the Anderson?
The discussion is in regards to the Anderson WD system. Apparently it causes increased wear on this type of coupling
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 08:05 AM   #13
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Coupler

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWCHIEF View Post
MY Bambi II had a Marvel coupler. It was 50 years old. I used an Andersen WD system on it for for three years with no noticeable additional wear. I went as far as buying a coupler rebuilt kit. I left it unused in the trailer when sold.
From the discussions I have hear this WD system causes increased wear to components that have some normal wear patterns. From your comments the wear is not that dramatic
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 08:08 AM   #14
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Coupler

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWCHIEF View Post
MY Bambi II had a Marvel coupler. It was 50 years old. I used an Andersen WD system on it for for three years with no noticeable additional wear. I went as far as buying a coupler rebuilt kit. I left it unused in the trailer when sold.
Were you happy with the Anderson WD system?
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 09:10 AM   #15
Vintage Kin
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
Images: 1
The heavier the trailer, the more likely the higher wear.

As it is, an Andersen cannot exert proper leverage for any but the lightest trailers for correct weight distribution

It's rather an expensive device to take the edge off incipient sway.

A Bambi is one thing, a modern 25' quite another.
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2015, 08:18 PM   #16
2 Rivet Member
 
1982 27' Excella
Huntsville , Texas
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 86
Today Anderson emailed me that the Marvel style coupler was OK and should not be a problem
GMarugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2015, 06:17 AM   #17
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMarugg View Post
Today Anderson emailed me that the Marvel style coupler was OK and should not be a problem
I suspected that would be their response. I was very happy with the Andersen. Unfortunetly I fell for the sky is falling babble here and bought the Blue Ox SwayPro for the Safari. Due to my own personal safety issues with the BO I will be replacing it as soon as I am able with a new Andersen.
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2015, 08:07 AM   #18
Vintage Kin
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
Images: 1
Chief, just get you a Cub, go for equal squat and never look back again. Your rig can handle the little extra weight. Can use jacks versus snap chains.
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 06:20 AM   #19
Rivet Master
 
AWCHIEF's Avatar
 
2006 23' Safari SE
Biloxi , Mississippi
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,278
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Chief, just get you a Cub, go for equal squat and never look back again. Your rig can handle the little extra weight. Can use jacks versus snap chains.
Are you willing to write the check?
__________________
MICHAEL

Do you know what a learning experience is? A learning experience is one of those things that says "You know that thing that you just did? Don't do that."
AWCHIEF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2015, 07:06 AM   #20
Vintage Kin
 
Fort Worth , Texas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,014
Images: 1
Value versus price problem?
slowmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
25FB vs 27FB - length EXCLUDING the coupling and drawbar Timofeevich 2009-2015 Flying Cloud 15 04-22-2013 08:23 PM
Calder 3 inch Coupling wallygilbert Waste Systems, Tanks & Totes 1 07-27-2009 07:07 AM
LA Times Article on Coupling Dangers fabofabo Our Community 1 12-10-2007 06:13 PM
Sewer Coupling niftypkg Waste Systems, Tanks & Totes 6 02-25-2007 08:20 AM


Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.