View Poll Results: Why did you choose one over the other: travel trailer or motorhome?
Better mpg with tow vehicle 29 17.79%
Easier to set up camp 31 19.02%
smaller vehicle available for "around the town" driving 45 27.61%
Safety 11 6.75%
Maneuverability 22 13.50%
Other 94 57.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-21-2005, 11:02 AM   #43
Rivet Master
dscluchfc's Avatar
1984 31' Excella
Abernathy , Texas
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 858
Obviously the solution is a new diesel pusher motorhome from Airstream, and a new CCD in tow behind the motorhome. hahahaha

TAC # TX-18

AIR # 410
dscluchfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2005, 11:46 AM   #44
Rivet Master
Condoluminum's Avatar
1988 25' Excella
Sunnyvale , California
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,858
Images: 13
Send a message via AIM to Condoluminum
Overwhelmingly it's "Other"...

While I enjoy David's idea of Diesel Pusher hauling CCD, this thread has proven point made earlier that rationalization justifies "feelings" (kind of like religion and faith..), and that choice is personal based on a lot of circumstances, rather than something worth number-crunching... Fact that almost 2/3 of respondents chose "other" as reasoning for their choices proves how hard it is to build a logic tree here..

Folks trying to decide should try each, including new and "vintage" if possible, and decide if they value satellite TV and the option to make a sandwich at freeway speeds, or the ability to drop "home" off at the campground, and explore by car or bicycle or powered skateboard... I think quality advice is to try and test and discuss feelings openly, and then NOT let others try to convince you you're "Wrong..." That's a sure way to wreck a discussion around the dinner table or campfire...

John McG


In Theory, there's no difference between Theory and Practice, but in Practice, there is usually a difference...
Condoluminum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2005, 01:02 PM   #45
Rivet Master
Cracker's Avatar
Currently Looking...
Pittsfield , Maine
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,099
I mentioned "safety" earlier in this thread - and several others have commented on the dangers of a motorhome. Still, many of those who seem to be "on the fence" with their opinions seem prone to ignore safety as a consideration.

Short of the dedicated "bus chassis" conversions out there, visit any of the Ma and Pa Class A motorhome factories and take a look at the stripped chassis and engine units awaiting their "house" shells. Now envison that the shells will be installed with little or no regard for crash protection - and certainly without any mandated guidelines regarding safety. Imagine yourself, your wife, and your children, riding down the highway at 70 mph, sitting in household dining room chairs, bolted to the chassis with a couple of small clip angles and #8 screws, surrounded by composite plywood panels screwed and glued to a plywood floor, and capped with a roof of similar construction. If you doubt the implications of this scenario, ask any of the major Ma and Pa motorhome builders to show you a crash test of their product. After that, if you're now somewhat concerned, start pricing the new bus chassis conversions. If their cost is out of reach, and you're still intent on owning a "motorhome," seriously consider purchasing an old school bus and converting it.

The Class C chassis is certainly a lot safer for two people - provided they remain buckled in - in the steel cab section! As for anyone else in most Class C's (---there are some exceptions,) they're no better off than those occupants of the Class A chassis previously outlined.

I don't intend to be all "doom and gloom" - and I certainly don't profess to be an expert on vehicular safety - but I think, especially for the newbies, that you simply need to research and study the facts before you make a decision that affects you and your family. Don't expect a salesman to point out the shortcomings of his product.

2003 GMC 3500 D/A, CC, LB, 4x4 and 2000 Airstream Excella 30. WBCCI 7074
Cracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 10:46 AM   #46
4 Rivet Member
Rivetedude's Avatar
Currently Looking...
Yorktown , Virginia
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 252
Images: 19
Send a message via Yahoo to Rivetedude
I chose a trailer because I don't have the time to go on long cross-country endeavors. A motorhome is better usually because you have use of the RV's facilities while traveling down the road...a necessity for long trips with finicky riders and children.

Usually motorhome owners will tow a small car which translates into better fuel economy for putting around town rather than driving a gas guzzling tow vehicle. Even a diesel tow vehicle can't compare to a small car for fuel economy.

Safety is probably six of one and half a dozen of the other. Tow vehicles are crash-tested, whereas motorhomes are behemoths.

Maneuvarability can be argued on both sides as well. Motorhomes with vehicle behind translate most of the time into much longer, taller, and heavier rigs. That often times results in limited accessibility to more rural roads.

As for setting up camp, I think both have their pros and cons. Motorhomes generally have more gadgets that make camp set-up easier (ie.- back-up cameras, hydraulic leveling, interior remote dump valves, etc.).

Overall, in my opinion, a motorhome is an easier more comfortable way to go, but it all depends on how often you're going to use it and how much money you want to sink into your RVing endeavors.


Go US Coast Guard!!!

"Keep You're Tin in the Wind"

My Photos
My MySpace!

Rivetedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 11:23 AM   #47
Southern Comfort
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 37
Wow, this is an old thread, but I must chime in. I've towed trailers before and now own my first MH and must admit I love it. I tow my motorcycle trailer and still can get approx. 9 mpg at 65 mph. I don't believe there is any reason to go any faster, because it is all about the trip and not how fast you get there. I love how easy it is to set up and take down and I still crank it up and drive around town, it's great to go to the mall in, my wife and her girlfriends go in and shop and I stay and watch tv or read in ac comfort in the back and of course when my nephew come to visit and we can't get away I drive them out to the pasture down by the pond and we camp. I did get a kick out of see one Airstreamer who could not make up his mind. He had a 325 MH towing a bambi.

Anyway to each his own, live and let live and all that jazz, I'm just happy that we are in that percentage of americans who actually get out and enjoy the beauty of this country.

Southern Comfort
Ray Pena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 06:27 PM   #48
Rivet Master
safari57's Avatar
1951 21' Flying Cloud
1960 24' Tradewind
West Coast , BC
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,790
Images: 10
Send a message via MSN to safari57
We looked hard at MH's and trailers, having already owned several SOB trailers. It came down to the fact that we enjoy vintage cars and a vintage trailer suits that well, but also the added maintenance of a MH. A whole additional power train to take care of, as we'd still need a toad if we bought the MH. For me with two commute vehicles and my vintage car to then add another full power train to maintain was not looking like a lot of fun. With a trailer we also have options on what to tow it with depending on where we are heading, weather conditions, and time of year.

safari57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2005, 01:41 PM   #49
Still Working
smily's Avatar
1994 36' Classic 36
North Charleston , South Carolina
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,681
Images: 19
Originally Posted by Silvertwinkie
Airstream makes motorhomes???

Yep, it is true. I keep a Bambi in one of my storage bins and use it as a wheel chock (sp) when the Auto Park function is giving me problems .
smily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 11:36 AM   #50
Moderator dude
Action's Avatar

1966 26' Overlander
Phoenix , Arizona
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,350
Images: 13
I didn't need another engine to service. So my TV does extra duty pulling my boat and my stream. Not at the same time. Since it seats 7, I use when some when family comes down from the North.

Besides people, there are other uses for my van.

Hauls the roof mounted X-mas tree.
Will hold 4'X8' sheets of ply wood flat with rear seat folded. Max I have done is 25.
Hauled cinder block for a small wall that was constructed.
Loaded stuff to donation center.

And many other hauling kinds of jobs. May be not as useful as a pick up however it gets the job done.

1966 Mercury Park Lane 4 DR Breezeway 410 4V, C-6, 2.80 - Streamless.
1966 Lincoln 4 door Convertible 462 4V 1971 Ford LTD Convertible 429 4V Phoenix ~ Yeah it's hot however it's a dry heat!
Action is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 12:25 PM   #51
Rivet Master
ALANSD's Avatar

1966 26' Overlander
Woodstock , Georgia
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,515
I love my motorhome, but every so often the idea of having a trailer comes up in my house. It would get me away form driving my Saturn, which sometimes gets old. It makes a great tow car and decent daily transport but leaves a lot to be desired.
On the other hand the Motohrome has been loads of fun, and we only toa our car when we are staying somewhere long enough to need one.
Honestly I am 50/50 on this topic, but will be keeping the Classic Motorhome for awhile longer
1966 overlander..sold
AIR #005
Please visit our blogs and web pages:
ALANSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 07:40 PM   #52
Rivet Master
Davydd's Avatar
Tonka Bay
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 767
Images: 13
Timely Discussion Revived

A lot has transpired in my thinking since this thread first appeared. There is another option to compare to trailers, especially the Bambi class 16-19 foot trailer and that is the B van or touring coach as Airstream prefers to call them. Airstream has three versions of a Mercedes Sprinter van. They are basically mini-motorhomes and I think somewhat different than the American Chevy and Ford big van conversions since the Sprinter is an all steel body and frame from the factory with the safety engineering built in. They have all the conveniences and room of the Bambi and have the conveniences of the motorhome as well. In addition they can be used every day and go anywhere a tow vehicle can go when not trailering with probably better fuel mileage than most all two vehicles (22 mpg diesel).

This to me is an option for touring not camping and staying. Great for weekending and week to two week trips. We have taken numerous vacations like hitting a half dozen National Parks and more in a two week period or traveling from Minnesota to Oregon and back stopping at the Black Hills, Yellowstone, Grand Teton, Craters of the Moon, Hell's Canyon, Columbia River, the Oregon coast, Corvallis, Mt. St. Helen's, Mt. Rainier and Teddy Roosevelt National Park (whew!) tent camping interspersed with a few motels. That has been our style and I am wondering if a Sprinter camper is the way to go with this kind of style. We arrived at a camp ground in Hell's Canyon after dark and then had to set up a tent. A Sprinter campervan would have been a better solution.

So that's an optional idea for the smaller campers. Here are comparative plans of the Airstream Interstate Sprinter and the Airstream 19 ft. Bambi.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	plan_ints_dl.gif
Views:	106
Size:	7.9 KB
ID:	17453  
Attached Images

2015 Sprinter Class B Camper Van
(Former 1971 vintage Airstream Owner)
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm new at this/ travel nursing = What TV? kwolff Tow Vehicles 16 07-13-2004 09:17 PM
season over, park dead, snow, travel fever!! eubank On The Road... 0 04-03-2004 11:50 AM
Financing Travel Trailer as 2nd Home Tax Deduction Mrs Silverback Our Community 8 07-11-2003 06:03 PM

Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by


This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Airstream, Inc. or any of its affiliates. Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.