Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-17-2002, 06:33 PM   #1
1 Rivet Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 12
Images: 1
Towing - 1965

Can anyone tell me what the weight of the 65 Globetrotter is? I'm looking into getting a new tow vehicle and was wondering if a V6 would do the job. Specifically, I'm looking at a Jeep Grand Cherokee with a V6 4.0. Any advice?

Thanks!
__________________

__________________
65trotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2002, 08:24 PM   #2
3 Rivet Member
 
Silver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 229
The specs show 2980 dry. Being that you're in CA, I would opt for a larger CID (or liter) and lower gear ratio as the Rockies are inbetween you and the places you are sure to venture. Oscar
__________________

__________________
Silver Bullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2002, 08:27 PM   #3
Retired Moderator
 
john hd's Avatar
 
1992 29' Excella
madison , Wisconsin
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,643
Images: 40
it's here

you can go here, you'll need acrobat reader.


http://www.airstream.com/faq/weights.pdf


john
__________________
john hd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2002, 08:36 PM   #4
1 Rivet Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 12
Images: 1
Thanks for the info guys. That helped a lot!

65trotter
__________________
65trotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2002, 12:15 AM   #5
Rivet Master
 
InsideOut's Avatar

 
1956 22' Safari
Vintage Kin Owner
Vintage Kin Owner
Conifer/Evergreen , Colorado
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 11,606
Images: 97
We towed our '64 GlobeTrotter with a Jeep Cherokee 6cyl. 4.0...it was miserable! Of course we are at elevation (mile-high Denver), but we had troubles even on the flats...maybe your luck at sea-level would be better, but I certainly wouldn't plan any Rocky Mountain trips without a V8.

Here are a couple of previous threads, #1 & #2 that discuss our experience & others.

Just my 2-cents...

Shari
__________________
InsideOut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 07:39 PM   #6
Rivet Master
 
Tom Nugler's Avatar

 
1972 25' Tradewind
Currently Looking...
McHenry County , Illinois
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 980
Images: 4
Towing

I previously towed my 67 with an Astro van with the 4.3 L. Do-able but not pleasent, and we are here in fairly flat land. I bought a used Econoline van with the 350 cid and a 3.55 rear end. This is much better but if I were goinging anywhere near any mountians I would change the rear end to a 3.73. Bottom line. The final drive ratios are more important than the displacement or horsepower. Also get a copy of Trailer Life when the tow rating issue comes out. You will find it very interesting.
__________________
Tom Nugler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 08:09 PM   #7
Aluminut
 
Silvertwinkie's Avatar
 
2004 25' Safari
. , Illinois
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,302
Quote:
Originally posted by Silver Bullet
The specs show 2980 dry. Being that you're in CA, I would opt for a larger CID (or liter) and lower gear ratio as the Rockies are inbetween you and the places you are sure to venture. Oscar
I would not get smaller gears. Any truck that is bought today comes with a minimum of 3.08s. Most prefer 3.73s, while some like 3.42s or 4.10s. I would go no lower than 3.08. Case in point, my gears are 2.93 and are for sh** towing. They work, but not as good as the bigger gears.

In the end, the larger CID or liter engine means not that much if it can't deliver the power to the pavement. I have what I would consider an extremely potent 350 and if I go with a bigger coach, I will have to go with the 3.73s if I want to be able to successfully deal with the additional size, weight, etc of the larger coach.

Larger gears should also work well in mountains too. From my understanding most gas engines deliver torque and HP at higher RPMs than diesel, so, larger gears increase the RPMs a bit at the very least.
__________________
Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq and millions of others are by far the most popular with about 70 million machines in use worldwide. Macintosh fans note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form. -NY Times 11/91
Silvertwinkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 12:21 PM   #8
3 Rivet Member
 
Silver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 229
Just for the record ST.....

Lower gears are representative of higher #'s. A 4.10 gear is lower than a 3.50. The higher the numerical value of a gear is "lower" than it's predecessor.

Oscar
__________________
Silver Bullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 06:30 AM   #9
3 Rivet Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 158
Send a message via Yahoo to Fun-Lovin
Rivet

I have towed many things with many different tow vehicles.
From experience I will agree with everyone here. The lower the gears the better and the more displacement the engine the better. Now for something that i dont think anyone mentioned, "STOPPING" it one thing to get a load going but a whole different story on the stopping. This is were tow vehicle weight comes into play. Granted most travel trailers have electric breaks but having a heavier vehicle just adds to the overall control.
Things ive towed and with what; and some of these will be crazy
16' & 18 run-a-bout ski boats with mazda p/u 2.0L ok for short runs but wouldnt want to go long distances
jet ski with 5.0L thunderbird, no problems other than the independant rear suspention making it feel weird.
2 horse trailer loaded with jeep cj7, ok the jeep was modified with auto trans and 350 chevy but this is not something i ever want to do again. Even with trailer breaks it wasnt going to stop.
loaded 16' car hauler extimated weight 6500lbs with dodge 1500 5.2L the truck had a towing package and was rated for 8100lbs but wouldnt get out of its own way here.
28' enclosed race trailer with f-250 powerstroke, no problems here or with the 29' airstream, trailer brakes are nice here but didnt have them on the airstream first time I towed it yet it stopped well.
Thats just my penny but stopping is more important than getting started. My flight instructor once said take-offs are optional but landing are manditory.
Greg
__________________
Fun-Lovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 09:19 AM   #10
Rivet Master
 
1975 29' Ambassador
Reno , Nevada
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,351
I agree that stopping is important but I don't think the proper solution is a heavier truck. Nothing against heavier trucks but

If your trailer brakes won't stop your trailer faster than your tow vehicle with stop itself alone, your trailer brakes need attention.
__________________

__________________
bryanl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Towing Question from a novice imaginair Tow Vehicles 13 10-20-2011 07:15 PM
Towing with a TDI VW Jetta PA BAMBI II Tow Vehicles 102 07-21-2011 09:27 AM




Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.

Airstream News Delivered to your Email!

Stay up-to-date with Airstream news in your inbox!

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]