Airstream Chat Room Airstream Links Campground & Product Reviews Airstream Classifieds Airstream Articles Blogs Photo Gallery Forum Listings Portal - Home Page

Go Back   Airstream Forums > Airstream Community Forums > Our Community > Off Topic Forum



Check out our new sister site AirstreamArticles.com. To contribute an article click here.

Quick Links
- Forum Listings
- Register - it's FREE!
- View Member's Map
- Airstream Articles
- "Live" Chat Room
- View Classifieds
- Post a Classified
- Airstream @ eBay
- Upcoming Rallies
   - Add A Rally
- Rally Discussions
- Repair Discussions
- Search Forums
- Member List
- AIR # Directory
- Member Search
- Profile Photos
- Airstream Photo
- Airstream Links
- Fun & Games
- WBCCI Websites
- WBCCI Unit Forums
- Courtesy Parking
- Campgrounds
- Support & FAQs
- Community Policies
- Helpers Needed




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2007, 09:18 PM   #1
3 Rivet Member

jbond's Avatar
Profile:  Shalimar , Florida
Posts: 234
Images: 13

The end of Airstreaming as we know it?

I haven't seen any news on how the the new CAFE standards will play with RV industry. As first glance it seems to me that drastic changes will be required. There's no truck available that will tow an Airstream and get 35mpg and I doubt that there ever will be unless Airstream returns to building the Airstreams of the 40s. Maybe motorhomes will be exempt from the 35mpg ?

see:

House fuel deal is bad, but beats the alternative
__________________
Herb
_________________
Wally# 1861
1ST VP VAC
Past Prez of Unit 029 in P'cola

63 Globetrotter Patty
63 Suburban Andy
63 Overlander Tex
62 Overlander Doc
jbond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 09:43 PM   #2
Rivet Master

wkerfoot's Avatar

Profile:  1979 23' Safari
1954 29' Liner
Orange , California
Posts: 1,659

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbond
I haven't seen any news on how the the new CAFE standards will play with RV industry. As first glance it seems to me that drastic changes will be required. There's no truck available that will tow an Airstream and get 35mpg and I doubt that there ever will be unless Airstream returns to building the Airstreams of the 40s. Maybe motorhomes will be exempt from the 35mpg ?

see:

House fuel deal is bad, but beats the alternative
Herb,

There is still lower CAFE requirements for trucks, unfortunately, in my opinion, this includes the mini vans and small suvs. There is no way that a minivan, PT Cruiser, Explorer, small crossover SUVs and the like should be grouped with trucks for CAFE, they are cars.

Bill

PS: please email or PM me a current email address, all the ones I have for you keep bouncing back.
__________________
Bill Kerfoot, WBCCI/VAC/CAC/El Camino Real Unit #5223
Just my personal opinion
1973 Dodge W200 PowerWagon, 1977 Lincoln Continental
1979 23' Safari, and 1954 29' Double Door Liner Orange, CA
wkerfoot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 09:54 PM   #3
Moderator

moosetags's Avatar
Profile:  2005 25' Safari
Santa Rosa Beach , Florida
Posts: 3,121
Images: 5

Hopefully, trucks that are currently not required by federal law to display any mpg figures on the new vehicle sticke will not be impacted by these standards. That currently includes 3/4 tons and up. The half ton trucks and SUVs make take a hit, though.
__________________
SuEllyn & Brian McCabe
WBCCI #3628 --- AIR #14872
2005 25' Safari FB (Lucy) with HAHA
2005 Suburban 2500 Quadrasteer (Olivia) & 2004 Suburban 2500 Quadrasteer (Daisy)
moosetags is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:04 AM   #4
2 Rivet Member
Profile:  1967 26' Overlander
Winston Salem , North Carolina
Posts: 91
Images: 5

I hope CAFE does not reduce our towing size down to 16 or 18 feet.

There will always be an Airstream, it is like Plymouth Rock.

Solid and has always been here.

Airstream is an icon like Cadillac and Harley Davidson.
__________________
Greg
Winston Salem, NC
WBCCI 5218,
1967 Overlander International.
FTC 15771
1979 Avion 30ft rear bath
Silverwanabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 03:51 AM   #5
Cyclist

henw's Avatar

Profile:  2007 28' International CCD
Windermere , Florida
Posts: 281

There will always be trucks classified for work status that will be exempt, or, will have higher fuel standards. The real issue will be fuel cost. NBC Nightly News had a feature on Motor Homes. Sales are down 10%. Push is on within the industry for lighter units getting greater MPG. Not many want a 7 mpg vehicle.
Tom
henw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 04:42 AM   #6
4 Rivet Member

Wayne&Sam's Avatar

Profile:  2007 20' Safari SE
Cuddebackville , NY
Posts: 431
Images: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by henw
Push is on within the industry for lighter units getting greater MPG. Not many want a 7 mpg vehicle.
Tom
Witness the popularity of the View and Navion etc, built on the Sprinter chassis. Small, well built and relatively great mileage.
Wayne&Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 05:06 AM   #7
Moderator

overlander63's Avatar
Profile:  1974 31' Sovereign
On The Road , Fulltiming
Posts: 11,990
Images: 52

but they are

Quote:
Originally Posted by wkerfoot
There is no way that a minivan, PT Cruiser, Explorer, small crossover SUVs and the like should be grouped with trucks for CAFE, they are cars.
I found this under the hood of a Chrysler minivan:
"This vehicle conforms to US EPA emissions standards for LIGHT TRUCKS for 2006 model year new motor vehicles."
Not bad for a made-over Dodge Aries...
__________________
Terry
You repair things with tools. You fix things with a hammer.
AIR#2611
overlander63 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 05:39 AM   #8
Rivet Master

85MH325's Avatar

Profile:  Tipton , Iowa
Posts: 2,861
Images: 37

Quote:
Originally Posted by overlander63
Not bad for a made-over Dodge Aries...
That quintessentially American Icon, the Chrysler K-Car, LIVES ON!!!!!!

Roger
__________________
AIR 2053 “A generation which ignores history has no past and no future.” Robert Heinlein
2006 Bigfoot 25B25RQ towed by a 2001 Born Free 23RK moho
85MH325 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 06:18 AM   #9
3 Rivet Member

Denis4x4's Avatar
Profile:  2006 Safari LS
Durango , Colorado
Posts: 154

First off, There are probably 20 times as many people pulling horse trailers as there are pulling Airstreams and a lot of them live in the countryside right outside DC. As far as I can determine, there will be plenty of exemptions for light trucks used for commercial purposes.

One immediate change may be that the manufacturers will resort to building honest-to-God work trucks with rubber mats, bench seats and roll up windows! Aftermarket truck accessory manufacturers will be in hog heaven.

I'm more concerned about punitive fuel taxes at the federal and state level to change driving habits than I am about the ability to buy a tow vehicle in the near future.
Denis4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 06:44 AM   #10
Always Airstreaming!

rickandsandi's Avatar
Profile:  2005 22' Safari
1960 24' Tradewind
Anytown , Connecticut
Posts: 2,476

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverwanabe
I hope CAFE does not reduce our towing size down to 16 or 18 feet.

There will always be an Airstream, it is like Plymouth Rock.

Solid and has always been here.

Airstream is an icon like Cadillac and Harley Davidson.
FYI- The Rock is currently under repair! Also note that when you do you visit Plimouth Rock you are seeing only a part of the original rock because it was once moved to the center green of town, dragged around and actually broke! So, the Rock is not so solid and definatly has not always been there. A little New England history lesson.
__________________
J. Rick Cipot
Sandi Gould
NEU New England Unit
Airstream Life Magazine
WBCCI #3411
AIR #17099
rickandsandi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:12 AM   #11
Tom, the Uber Disney Fan

Minnie's Mate's Avatar
Profile:  2006 30' Safari
Fayetteville , Georgia
Posts: 3,233
Images: 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickandsandi
FYI- The Rock is currently under repair! Also note that when you do you visit Plimouth Rock you are seeing only a part of the original rock because it was once moved to the center green of town, dragged around and actually broke! So, the Rock is not so solid and definatly has not always been there. A little New England history lesson.
Let's not forget that Airstream was once a solely California built travel trailer, then moved to Ohio, oh yeah, the Beatrice Years and some quality issues from the first part of this century...so I guess Airstream has been moved, dragged around, broke (twice), not so solid...and some say we are waiting for it to be fixed again, too!
__________________
2006 30' Safari - "Changes in Latitudes"
2008 F-250 Lariat Power Stroke Diesel Crew Cab SWB
Family of Disney Fanatics
WBCCI# 4821
Minnie's Mate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:17 AM   #12
'97 Excella 25

Bob Thompson's Avatar
Profile:  Corpus Christi , Texas
Posts: 570
Images: 60

Count me as one of the supporters for higher gas mileage standards. For years the RV industry has been obsessed with bigger is better. This years' model is always bigger than last years model. Bigger and heavier trailers mean bigger and more capable tow vehicles. After years and years of sailboat class racing where the creed is "every ounce counts", I was unprepared to deal with the useless excesses in RV's. In sailboats, you took everything out that wasn't necessary. It helped the boat slide thru the water easier. It had the secondary effect of making the interior feel more spacious. Applying this same logic to RV's, making reductions in weight and size, coupled with improved aerodynamics can't be a bad thing. Properly done, the interiors will feel just as spacious, but you won't need a locomotive to get it down the highway.

I've taken this approach with my 25' Excella. Original weight was around 6000 lbs dry. I've made many many modifications to reduce weight and increase spaciousness. It now weighs around 5000 pounds dry, it's quite spacious feeling inside without feeling stripped down, and I don't need a locomotive to take it where I want to go. The industry could learn from this "retired Architects' " efforts because it really is "better".
__________________
2002 Toyota Tundra
Why is it Levee's built by volunteers with sand bags hold better than Levee's built as directed by the Corps of Engineers with millions of taxpayer dollars?
Bob Thompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:36 AM   #13
Rivet Master

Lumatic's Avatar

Profile:  1971 25' Tradewind
1962 28' Ambassador
Estancia , New Mexico
Posts: 1,094

Ethics vs. Economics

The high price of fuel is not all bad. Obviously I enjoy hooking up my AS and going for a nice cruise. Think we have it bad? In Europe gas is twice what we pay. Supply and demand applies at least to most of us who aren't idenpendantly wealthy. I can't help but wonder though, everytime I see a milliion dollar motorhome if the owners are concerned about the price of gas and more importantly the amount of poop they are putting into the atmosphere. RVs are still a drop in the poop bucket compared to other sources of CO such as industry and general auto use. When I do take out my AS it is now with at least a twinge of guilt which I assuage with the rationalization I only have a 3 block commute to work and do try to save gas with daily driving and am now trying to make my home more energy efficient. Still big time RVing is an American luxury that is a outgrowth of our gas guzzling lifestyle which may be living on borrowed time. As for me as long as I can move I will be camping but maybe going back to simpler days with no so many creature comforts is around the corner. After all it's camping.
__________________
Hops make the hippy happy
Lumatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:16 AM   #14
2 Rivet Member
Profile:  1971 25' Caravanner
scappoose , Oregon
Posts: 68

Foregoing posts are pretty much right on. I too have been involved in sailboats for most of my life, and have seen incredible changes in the industry to reduce weight, so as to increase performance.
High-tech construction does cost more, but if you break it down, most materials cost by the lb. The extra costs involved, usually are due to needing a more skilled work force to build the product.
rangebowdrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airstreaming at 80+ alone zekethebear Our Community 14 01-28-2008 08:40 PM
Airstreaming Alone lwood Member Introductions 17 10-27-2007 10:33 PM
Airstreaming again! Grand Master Member Introductions 5 10-27-2007 05:42 AM
New to the Forum but not to Airstreaming... Bijou65 Member Introductions 11 02-02-2007 04:17 PM
AIRSTREAMING in NEW ZEALAND? iamsusanq On The Road... 2 06-06-2005 10:49 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement
Airstream Trailer Forum - Aquarium & Reef Forum
Royal Forum - Book and Reader Forum - Yoga Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Yoga Forum
Interference - U2, Pop Culture & Social Responsibility
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.

eXTReMe Tracker

Other recommended Airstream sites:
Airstream Forums - Airstream Classifieds - Airstream Articles
Airstream Central - Airstream Photos