Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-19-2012, 12:07 PM   #43
Rivet Master
 
bkahler's Avatar

 
1974 20' Argosy 20
Richmond , Kentucky
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyair View Post
Brad.
Our MH has an edelbrock carb on the stock manifold.

There is a vacuum port on the intake manifold, behind the carb on passenger side.
It feeds the transmission modulator(the upward facing connector)... and thats all I know so far
I will be using a TH400 for a while before I get around to rebuilding and installing the 4L80E so I assume the port on my 2161 manifold will be used for that.

Quote:
... at least one of the pipes(rh side) goes nowhere and was not attached or plugged
You probably ought to fix that

Quote:
... and the other goes to the vacuum step feed(I think!), but there is also the vacuum pipe that comes from the rear of the carb....
Still trying to figure it all out!
Isn't the port on the rear of the carb the PCV port?
__________________

__________________
Air forums # 1674
1974 20' Argosy Motor Home
1974 31' Excella trailer (parting out, as of 4/1/2015 I have wheels, brake drums, windows & holding tanks left to sell)
bkahler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 05:19 PM   #44
Rivet Master
 
Keyair's Avatar

 
1984 34.5' Airstream 345
Foothill Ranch , California
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,935
Images: 1
Yeah, I fixed that vacuum leak... I could hear it, but I took me a while to find it as it was tucked under the throttle bracket!

The PCV pipe feeds into the front of the carb in the center lower port.

As for that vac pipe out of the rear of the carb...

I know we might get slightly off topic, but its connected..

On my search I found this little gem tucked under the drivers side floor..




It is a water or water/methanol injection system called a Vari-Flow Injector...
I have the box, wires, pipes and pump still there, altho I did pull out a 20' pipe that went back to the rear of the MH, which I assume was the water feedpipe which either went to the freshwater tank or a seperate tank... both of which are long gone!

Some digging turned up this info contained in a patent application...

For example in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,370, issued Dec. 21, 1982 to Byron D. Smith et al there is taught a water injection system which injects water, alcohol, or a mixture of water and alcohol into the air intake of an internal combustionengine by the use of an electric motor driven pump that delivers the fuel under pressure to a nozzle mounted on the cover of an air cleaner above the air inlet of the carburetor. A similar system is taught in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,448,153, issued May15, 1984 to Robert J. Miller.

Other systems for injection of liquid into an internal combustion engine are taught in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,397,268, issued Aug. 9, 1983 to Charles L. Brown which uses a venturi effect to draw moisture from a remote liquid supply tank through aporous venturi tube positioned within the air flow inlet to the internal combustion engine. A similar system is taught in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,654, issued Dec. 6, 1983 to Kodo Keium.

A different type of system is taught in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,306,520, issued Dec. 22, 1981 to David E. Slaton which uses engine vacuum in an air cleaner chamber to draw water from the chamber into the air cleaner housing of the internalcombustion engine.

Another type of system on the market today is a system manufactured by MPG Performance Products of Newberry Park, Calif. and distributed under the trade name of Vari-Flow Injector. This system consists of a twelve-volt water pump that develops61/2 pounds per square inch pressure and a sensing control that monitors the engine load. When the system is turned on the water pump provides water to the sensing control at the given pressure with the sensing control including a valve that iscontrolled by engine manifold vacuum. Other water injection systems are available on the marketplace and are being sold by the J.C. Whitney & Co. of Chicago, Ill. The various systems heretofore mentioned in the patents and on the marketplace todaygenerally involve positive water injection by electronic control using pumps and nozzles to accomplish the injection. From the applicants knowledge and from his prior art search, no system can be found using the applicants novel venturi injector systemusing the novel venturi injector in combination with the novel liquid level control chamber as hereinafter described.


I wonder if it worked, or indeed works still if I figured it out and connected it!
__________________

__________________
Keyair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 08:11 PM   #45
Rivet Master
 
bkahler's Avatar

 
1974 20' Argosy 20
Richmond , Kentucky
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,350
Interesting little gimmick

Does it look like all the components are there? From your description it sounds like it's still hooked up with the exception of the actual connection to the water tank.

Thinking about it, it should go well with your Zemco computer

Which reminds me, I picked up these recently:

Click image for larger version

Name:	Zemco-de700 compass.JPG
Views:	72
Size:	379.7 KB
ID:	173049Click image for larger version

Name:	zemco-ez711-compass.JPG
Views:	71
Size:	336.6 KB
ID:	173050

One for the Argosy and one for my 2000 F250. I never know which way I'm going so hopefully these will help

Brad
__________________
Air forums # 1674
1974 20' Argosy Motor Home
1974 31' Excella trailer (parting out, as of 4/1/2015 I have wheels, brake drums, windows & holding tanks left to sell)
bkahler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 10:11 PM   #46
Rivet Master
 
Keyair's Avatar

 
1984 34.5' Airstream 345
Foothill Ranch , California
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,935
Images: 1
LOL... we think alike Brad!
I think its all there, so later I will have to fiddle!

Oh... and Zemco Compasses...
Who would want one of those...
Except us!
__________________
Keyair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 06:20 AM   #47
Rivet Master
 
bkahler's Avatar

 
1974 20' Argosy 20
Richmond , Kentucky
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,350
I preferred that model over the one with the road stripe but he only had the one with the vehicle. I think the Zemco units fit the style of the motorhome better than the more modern units that are out there.

Kids and their toys....

Brad
__________________
Air forums # 1674
1974 20' Argosy Motor Home
1974 31' Excella trailer (parting out, as of 4/1/2015 I have wheels, brake drums, windows & holding tanks left to sell)
bkahler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 08:40 PM   #48
4 Rivet Member
 
Jenniflow's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
1986 34.5' Airstream 345
Sausalito , California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 405
Send a message via Skype™ to Jenniflow
Question What will I need to do for CA with my 1986 345?

Hey Keyair,

You are such a treasure, I am so grateful for all you've done and documented here. Thank you! I'm hoping you can help me wrap my mind around the technicalities and expenses I am about to incur if I choose to keep my moho in CA.

I am just getting smacked in the head with my denseness. I have been listening to the assurances of folks who don't have direct experience with these issues who have been assuring me I can always get a non-op for my 1986 345 classic MH if it doesn't smog. I just called CA and they told me there is no such thing available any more in CA and it must smog by current standards and must be registered in CA if it's to stay in CA longer than 20 days.

So did you retrofit your classic in order to meet that standard? I'm not a mechanic so I'm having trouble following the specifics here. I installed a Banks system 10 years ago, but I believe I'm missing a serpentine, was it? pump? Part of the exhaust or emissions system? I've lost the piece of paper that had the name of that part on it, I'm embarrassed to say. I've never tried to locate one and and I don't know if I really need it to pass.

Is there any way you can explain what I'd need to do and how much I'd have to pay someone else to bring my coach up to California's standards? I couldn't do the work myself but I can help find parts, etc.

Thanks so much,
__________________
Jenniflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 09:12 PM   #49
Rivet Master
 
Keyair's Avatar

 
1984 34.5' Airstream 345
Foothill Ranch , California
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,935
Images: 1
Jenniflow!
Good to see you!

I know I am a treasure...
How?
Everywhere my girlfriend takes me they say "Wow, where on earth did you dig him up?".

LOL, anyway, joking aside...
Don't worry about not understanding...
Sounds like you are missing a smog pump(airpump).
__________________
Keyair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 12:21 AM   #50
4 Rivet Member
 
Jenniflow's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
1986 34.5' Airstream 345
Sausalito , California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 405
Send a message via Skype™ to Jenniflow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyair View Post
Sounds like you are missing a smog pump(airpump).
Actually I do remember now someone mentioned something about a pulley that I'm missing.

But my question really is was the basic equipment design from the 1980s enough to satisfy them when you had yours smogged? If not, what did u need to do? Or do you register yours in another state, Keyair?
__________________
sent from my hipflask
Jenniflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 12:35 AM   #51
4 Rivet Member
 
Jenniflow's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
1986 34.5' Airstream 345
Sausalito , California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 405
Send a message via Skype™ to Jenniflow
Current requirements for CA registration

OK, I have now had several conversations with various California DMV folks and have asked them very specific questions about what they are and are not looking for. Here's what they all insist: Current regs require a retrofit, if necessary, to bring all RVs registered for the road to meet what they call the CA or 50-state emissions standard. The only exception they were willing to grant was for a Planned Non-Op for a vehicle that is set off the road, out of sight of the road, and preferably behind a gate, so as to indicate clearly that there is "no intent to drive," a phrase I heard them repeat. One woman told me that if a cop sees a coach in a driveway with expired tags - i.e., it may actually be registered as a non-op - he's within his right to charge that you do in fact have an intent to drive it and it's not appropriately registered. She says that this derives from the concern that the RV is inhabitable.

My guess is this is partly about juridictions and that there is otherwise no governing body over RVs that are being lived in. CA is vigilant about code issues relating to residences. Also, it's a great way to raise income.

So, whereas it may once have been that you can bring the vehicle up to the standards at which it was originally built, it must now meet the 50-state or CA standard and that may mean some retrofitting with new emissions equipment. They told me I can take mine to one of the stations listed on the DMV site where they smog and do this kind of work. Sounds like a bit of a conflict of interest but there you are. Oh, there are smog stations where they don't do the work, too, so you can get tested by someone who does not stand to profit from the work they might claim you need.

Here's where you can look for the various kinds of smog stations:
Station List

So that's the report from the DMV front. I hope that doesn't ruin anyone's dinner. I sure found the news bracing!
__________________
Jenniflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 07:47 AM   #52
Rivet Master
 
92landyacht's Avatar
 
1992 36' Land Yacht
Grayson , Georgia
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 772
I'd move.... Way cheaper in the long run.
__________________
92landyacht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 01:39 PM   #53
Rivet Master
 
Keyair's Avatar

 
1984 34.5' Airstream 345
Foothill Ranch , California
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,935
Images: 1
Jenniflow.
From what I know and read on the CA smog website, that info you were given is wrong...
DMV know nothing...
Here is the info and where to get it!

Whilst the actual emissions level are set by county, the inspection process is the same.
It states that there are two steps..

Visual and tailpipe test.

Visual test is as it sounds.. Read Page 13, where it specifically states that the Emissions equipment shall be as OEM either CA or Federal equiped.
There is NO mention of updating or modifying a Federal Vehicle to CA standards.
Everything that was fitted when it left the factory should be still there and functional.

You MH is over the weight limit for a ASM or rolling road test, so it will be test by the TSI(Two Speed Inspection) method... that is at idle and at 2500rpm.
See page 10.

Here is a direct link to the draft 2013 Smog info PDF...
http://www.smogcheck.ca.gov/80_BARRe...ual%202013.pdf
__________________
Keyair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 01:51 PM   #54
4 Rivet Member
 
Jenniflow's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
1986 34.5' Airstream 345
Sausalito , California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 405
Send a message via Skype™ to Jenniflow
Exclamation MOre details on CA smogging

Ok, so then I called the Referee Office which is the decision-making office about what to do if your vehicle doesn't smog (and which can get you up to around $500r if your vehicle doesn't smog and needs repairs) and he said NO, you do NOT need to meet current CA standards, as long as your coach is doing at least as well as it was designed to do originally.

If, as a CA resident, you were bringing in a new vehicle (<7500 miles) and had somehow disabled the smog system, you would have to bring it up to CA standards. But if you are bringing an older vehicle from another part of the world it does NOT have to, it just has to live up to being its original self.

I have now talked to 5 different people, all apparently very experienced in this area - DMV techs, Test-Only smog techs (who have nothing to gain by failing you and requiring repairs), and now a Referee Office tech and each of them has told me something somewhat different.

I am now going to call a local RV service office to see what they do to smog their used vehicles, because going through the government agency websites that direct you to authorized smogging stations is turning up a lot of people who don't seem to understand about what Airforums drivers are likely to be running into!
__________________
Jenniflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 01:52 PM   #55
4 Rivet Member
 
Jenniflow's Avatar
 
1982 34' Limited
1986 34.5' Airstream 345
Sausalito , California
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 405
Send a message via Skype™ to Jenniflow
Oops, just as you were posting yours I was posting my last one! You're right! They have no idea what they're talking about. Sorry for confusing the issue Keyair. But the news is good!
__________________
Jenniflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 01:53 PM   #56
Rivet Master
 
Keyair's Avatar

 
1984 34.5' Airstream 345
Foothill Ranch , California
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,935
Images: 1
Oh, here is the current regs...
Page 9 is the visual statement of what should be present and correct!

http://www.smogcheck.ca.gov/80_BARRe...08-09%20V3.pdf
__________________

__________________
Keyair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Airstream is a registered trademark of Airstream Inc. All rights reserved. Airstream trademark used under license to Social Knowledge LLC.