|
I've considered these trailers too. From what I've seen, the dry weights are very close. Here's how I see it:
16' - If it's an SE or CCD, nicer interior finish, fully opening side windows, and panoramic windows (maybe front and rear.) Two sleeping areas. Wet bath.
17' Sport - Brand new. Dual tanks - easier for boondocking. Only one sleeping area, and it's pretty narrow. Dry bath.
The way I see it, the 17' is an odd floorplan. I don't want a huge bathroom and a small bed in a small trailer - those priorities seem reversed. I find the big back bathroom wall dominates the interior, making it feel less open. I'd rather have two sleeping areas, and deal with campground showers.
I think the 16' Bambi is going to have better resale. They seem to be holding their value pretty well, seldom dipping below $20k. (It appears to be easier to sell the higher trim CCD or SE models.) Right now, there seems to be quite a few heavily discounted brand new 17' Sports out there. I'm not convinced it's been that popular of a model.
If your tow vehicle can handle it, I'd put a 22' Sport (preferably a later 08 or 09 with the additional curbside window) into consideration. Leftovers are heavily discounted which might put them into your budget. Two sleeping areas, including a big front bed.
Frankly, I'm giddy with anticipation, hoping Airstream builds the all-composite Scout prototype they showed at the RVIA show. Lightweight, big bed, small bathroom, lots of windows - sweet. This would fit our RVing needs well - just a couple, using it for 2-3 day weekends, hitch up and go on a whim, works with a modest tow vehicle. (That's why I bought a T@B in the end - but I still covet silver....)
Tom
|