[mrmossyone]

What if the measures that "environmentalists" take to save the earth today end up harming it in the future? You would then think it wasn't prudent to rush into something in order to save ourselves from ourselves. For example, DDT. In the rush to possibly, again I say possibly( as it was never proven beyond a doubt that it even was the cause), save a species from this evil pesticide, the environmentalist were successful in having it banned. The direct impact of that decision has been the loss of millions and millions of lives, many of them being children. You see we were on the path to completely wipe out malaria and thus save millions from that horrible death. Instead we chose to possibly save a nonhuman species and let all those millions die. All variables should be considered before taking steps to solve a problem that may not exist and that may be better for us than the "cure".